imported_Aurora40
New member
truzoom said:Please refer to the December issue of Motor Trend magazine. I have taken a picture of the cover, but you'll have to buy the magazine to read the entire article that provides their reasons for claiming the new GTR may match the ZO6.
*edit---
You can actually read the articles online:
2009 Nissan GT-R - First Drive - Motor Trend
First Look: 2008 Nissan GT-R
Cool, thanks for the links. The online one doesn't seem to mention the 11.7 second 1/4 mile time, nor any trap speed. Though it mentions the CO2 emissions rate...

I'm not sure what "technologies" some people are referring to though. Saying AWD is more "tech" or is always superior is sort of silly. I notice some people still choose BMW's instead of Audi's, for example. The things like Bilstien selective shocks aren't new. Corvette for example had them in 1989. "VDS" or stability control also isn't new. The only thing they really mention is the display screen, though I'd call that gimmicky before saying it's some superior tech. Stuff like the g-meter isn't a first, but steering angle just seems gimmicky. That data is available on most cars with stability control, but why would anyone want a display of it?
Anyway, it seems like a car that has strong performance. And I'm sure it will be the "must have" car for some people, in the same way a Porsche, Ferrari, Corvette, etc is for other people. But some people here make it sound like it's some gift from heaven that will change how we think about sports cars. That seems absurd to me.
I do notice most of the performance claims in the MT article come from Nissan. Like the idea that it has the best brakes of any production car, "Better than any Ferrari or Porsche". Well if some Nissan employee said it, then I'm sure it's true.