I am not a professional detailer. Just an extreme hobbyist with skills and more importantly patience, judgement and an extensive science background.
High speed application of any of the sealants I use does not ever cross my mind. That's where patience enters the equation and the need to push out finished product is not necessary - hobbyist. If one of my cars is in the cycle of being detailed, well I drive another one. No need to rush the cake by turning up the oven.
Polymers are resistant to heat, cold and other external assaults. During the formation of this final macromolecular product the polymer (chains of monmers
can be disrupted if not total chemically alter by external forces. One of them is heat. Take your sealant and place on a petri plate and supply heat. At some point the polymer will degrade. What is this temperature? The point is there is a point and unless you know what the degradation point is one can not equivocally state the sealant in question is unaltered by the heat generated by a high speed buffer. Please reference if you can WG, NXT, Zaino, BF, UPP. So equating the final product's strength with it structural components without having this data (i.e melting point) of these structural components is just assumptional.
As I stated earilier please supply data re-enforcing your heat-activation theory. I would love to have you revolutionize the way we use sealants and add 5,6,7 coats a day. ZFX and high heat would mean infinitum coats per day.
Even so I still am not willing to subject my vehicles or anyone else's to high temps (+212 for H2O or lower temps for more volatile solvents) in order to produce a protective coating or augment shine. Especially when this short-cut is not recommended or even suggested by any of the sealants manufacturers I am familiar with.
Waiting patiently for your references.
Your tone needs adjustment. We do not communicate here at Autopia in that manner but we do seek answers and better ways to detail. :xyxthumbs
Buff on Brother, Buff on!!!