Scottwax said:
Something wrong saying something that flat isn't true though. David does have his own manufacturing plant (I've been to it) and he is a chemical engineer with years of experience. He does formulate, test and make his own products. To suggest otherwise does a great disservice to him and his company.
Geez, what did I say... Even IF he has a mfg facility, it's limited in nature. OK so he may have a chemical engineering background, it still limited. Good for him.:clap:
Trying to gauge Menzerna vs another polish is a bit difficult. Everyone uses different ways to obtain the level of gloss. And it is with that you just can't do a fair evaluation unless it's done in a controled environment, not out in the field.
It's like trying to get Menzerna into the majority of body shops. Everyone has been using 3M for generations. 3M has a very strong marketing and field staff that has so many seminars and training seesions it's insane. But, give a 3M user the correct corresponding Menzerna polish and they are very impressed, but just can't give up good ol 3M. Does that surprise you? It shouldn't.
A good example is the crew that did the prep work on my new Porsche. Great guys, very talented and 3M trained. I dropped off the 85RD for final finish and instructed which pad to use and speed/technique etc. As impresssed as they were, they just cannot give up 3M. As I informed them this was a straight polish, not a glaze.
I'm sure Optimum is a fine product and maybe will grow to a larger market share in the trade. But until then, I will always use Menzerna polishes on all customer cars as I know the results and abilities. I do not have the luxury of time to spend working polishes and need the same quck polishing/finishing that Meguiars did but with greater accuracy that Menzerna provides.
Regards,
Deanski