NXT vs. Z2 vs. Klasse SG Cleaning Test (56K warning)

I just don't understand how some people can see argue what happened in the test. (I feel like Mugatu after he just took a bunch of "crazy pills")



Also, for someone who works in the industry, I'm a bit suprised at the defensive nature of Phillip's posts. When you consider the amount of criticism and personal attacks Sal has received here in the past but still chose to keep away and maintain the forum's integrity, he earned a lot of respect....at least from me. I guess not everyone can live up to Sal's standard.



Funny how everyone in the past loved the term "Zaino zealot". Oh well, Meguiar's Zealot just doesn't have the same ring. How about Meguiar's Maniac? Or Phillips Phanatic?



I think BretFraz said it best (paraphrase) when he said that it was refreshing to see the results doing the speaking....not the long, winded posts by someone who works for the company.
 
ShowroomLincoln said:
Ahh, I gotcha now. So, the numerous threads hyping NXT as the greatest product ever with zero proof except for claims from the manufacturer are fine. Anything that goes against the new uber product is not credible. Gotcha.



SRL.

Cool that's what was needed. Not only did you prove that NXT removed the line, but you also from direct comparison with petro- containing LSP ( Klasse SG and Zaino Z2) that the solvents component had nothing to do with the removal of the marker. Very interesting. Could it be abrasives doing the cleaning? From your experiment it surely points in that direction. Is it bad? Only if you are trying to layer NXT like Zaino or Klasse SG.



I still stand by my remark about comparing like products.

NXT - combo product LSP (mild cleaner/ sealant)

SG - LSP that if used properly had a cleaning step performed by another product or its twin AIO.

Z2 same as SG but requires Z1 or ZFX or some form of cleansing step (Dawn) to remove contaminates.





On the claims: How does this relate to the appearance achieved using this product (NXT). Please direct me to a quote that states anything other than appearance verses these long established products.

Layerability - never claimed . 1-2 coats for complete coverage only recommendation by Mequiar's

Durability - Mike P stated his displeasure on measuring this factor because of all the variables involved ( garaged, acid-rain, intense UV, etc, etc.)

Appearance: subjective and again skewed towards application vehicle's condition and prep ( same for all LSP's).



Sorry, I prodded you into verifying your initial report, but with the follow-up you have done I believe that we may now find the results more complete and conclusive to what is going on.

As I stated before excellent post, pictures and very thought stimulating. :bow



To other Autopian's: I hope my analysis of the test format and indirect implications from incomplete data presentation did not rub you the wrong way. If so my apologies. :wavey
 
MBZ 500E said:


To everyone debating on this thread IMHO we all need to take a deep breath and relax. It doesn't matter if a product has cleaning abilities or how it will layer. The important thing is how well the product protects your paint and how it makes it look. All other aspects are moot.:)



Afshin,



The point of this thread is that some of us DO care if a product has cleaning abilities. Its OK if you don't care but don't condemn those of us who do. We're trying to learn more and educate those interested at the same time. It's our passion too.



The car care products industry is partially built on lies, deception, marketing hype, and flat out BS, among other things. One reason Autopia exists is to help people cut thru all that crap and get to the truth. Those of us who insert themselves in this situation are tired of the industry shenanigans and want mfr's to be more honest and forthcoming. Meguiar's involvement at Autopia has made them a bit of target but with MORE discussion we should be able to discover what is really going on with stuff like NXT.



EVERYONE

We all have our own definitions of "truth". For those who do not like these types of discussions, I'd think the least you could do is allow us to find truth in our own way. Participate in the debate if you like but don't slam us because you don't like the subject matter or tone. In the long run the entire community will benefit from the expanded knowledge base.
 
BW said:
I'm still unsure what Edwin is saying - after all, I'm just a stupid dentist who doesn't understand scientific thinking. Everyone else who disagrees must be too. Just kidding Edwin! I think it's you and not us.

With experience, we know when to accept things and when to question them. This is not the case for the latter. With some common sense, anyone who is following this thread should be able to assume that NXT doesn't layer. Of course it's not scientific, but it doesn't need to be. We don't do chemical analysis' of Big Macs every time we eat them, do we?





It is me. I accept that. But just being a dumb physician (medical Laboratory CAP) I am always critically analysing data presented. Be it a journal article about a new test, medication or procedure. I am sure during your first 2 years of med school (dental and medical students spent this time together at BU) you were presented a course in this type of analytical thinking. From reading stats to clinical outcomes.

If this thread was a question about the layering ability of NXT how would one come to the seemingly "obvious" conclusion that NXT does not layer from the initial presentation. Removal of ink does not or may not directly relate to a cured polymer sealant resistance to whatever factors (solvent or abrasives) that were involved with the ink's removal. That’s why I suggested the tangent test of NXT over cured Zaino and the reporting of the protected ink line status. Testing if NXT layers NXT was not necessary because product never claimed this ability. Nevertheless, it would nice to know from a simple test that NXT could possibly be a LSP for Zaino/SG.
 
bretfraz said:
Afshin,



The point of this thread is that some of us DO care if a product has cleaning abilities. Its OK if you don't care but don't condemn those of us who do. We're trying to learn more and educate those interested at the same time. It's our passion too.



The car care products industry is partially built on lies, deception, marketing hype, and flat out BS, among other things. One reason Autopia exists is to help people cut thru all that crap and get to the truth. Those of us who insert themselves in this situation are tired of the industry shenanigans and want mfr's to be more honest and forthcoming. Meguiar's involvement at Autopia has made them a bit of target but with MORE discussion we should be able to discover what is really going on with stuff like NXT.



EVERYONE

all have our own definitions of "truth". For those who do not like these types of discussions, I'd think the least you could do is allow us to find truth in our own way. Participate in the debate if you like but don't slam us because you don't like the subject matter or tone. In the long run the entire community will benefit from the expanded knowledge base.





Well stated Bret.

Still Autopian friends?



I appreciate your questioning my views and I am sure the reverse is true. Sometimes it gets a little heated but like brothers we make-up and re-group for the next battle ;). Patting each other on the back would serve no purpose but the revealing of the truth about products benefits everyone. :xyxthumbs



Afshin,

I also see your point but sometimes these discussion get down right dirty but always with good intention implications.
 
I may be new here so this may not mean much but I did the same test only with NXT and Z2. The NXT would only remove the marker if I put a lot of pressure on it, but the Z2 also removed the marker if I put the same amount of pressure on, both took quite a bit. If I applied the NXT the same as I usually apply Z2(light pressure, just enough needed to get it on the paint) it didn't put a dent in the marker. Don't really know what else to say from my test but the results seemed pretty interesting(to me at least).
 
bretfraz said:
Afshin,



The point of this thread is that some of us DO care if a product has cleaning abilities. Its OK if you don't care but don't condemn those of us who do. We're trying to learn more and educate those interested at the same time. It's our passion too.



The car care products industry is partially built on lies, deception, marketing hype, and flat out BS, among other things. One reason Autopia exists is to help people cut thru all that crap and get to the truth. Those of us who insert themselves in this situation are tired of the industry shenanigans and want mfr's to be more honest and forthcoming. Meguiar's involvement at Autopia has made them a bit of target but with MORE discussion we should be able to discover what is really going on with stuff like NXT.



Bret,



Sounds fair enough.:) I'm not really condemning just throwing out my opinion.:o





Everyone,



I'm going to try the same test on my drier today using a black Sharpie, I'll post a few pics on this thread later. The pressure I apply will be exactly the same as how I would apply it to my car. I'll also do an extended test using three coats of Z2 to find out if Z2 can hold up or if NXT will remove it easily. The Z2 test will take some time since I will first need to use Z1 and three coats of Z2 will take 3 days.
 
MBZ 500E said:
Bret,





I'm going to try the same test on my drier today using a black Sharpie, I'll post a few pics on this thread later. The pressure I apply will be exactly the same as how I would apply it to my car. I'll also do an extended test using three coats of Z2 to find out if Z2 can hold up or if NXT will remove it easily. The Z2 test will take some time since I will first need to use Z1 and three coats of Z2 will take 3 days.



By using 3 layers of Z2 you will not be able to tell what the NXT removed. It may remove 1 or 2 layers and you will never know. Then you will say the test proved NXT *doesn't* remove Z2. Stick with 1 layer.



To me a fair extention of the current test done would be to do *a* layer over the Sharpie and let it properly cure then apply NXT using your prescribed pressure.



I would do this test myself but a few things come to mind.



a) My dryer is not base/clear but enameled and Z2 is for base/clear.

b) My dryer top is in poor condition and rather porous.

c) I don't have my NXT yet.
 
MBZ 500E said:
I'm going to try the same test on my drier today using a black Sharpie, I'll post a few pics on this thread later. The pressure I apply will be exactly the same as how I would apply it to my car. I'll also do an extended test using three coats of Z2 to find out if Z2 can hold up or if NXT will remove it easily. The Z2 test will take some time since I will first need to use Z1 and three coats of Z2 will take 3 days.



I'll offer a suggestion for what it's worth - make sure you use "control" samples and measurements - test your pads "dry" to check for any possible color lifting, etc. That way, you'll have a better idea as to what's happening with the products.
 
Jesstzn said:
By using 3 layers of Z2 you will not be able to tell what the NXT removed. It may remove 1 or 2 layers and you will never know. Then you will say the test proved NXT *doesn't* remove Z2. Stick with 1 layer.



To me a fair extention of the current test done would be to do *a* layer over the Sharpie and let it properly cure then apply NXT using your prescribed pressure.



I would do this test myself but a few things come to mind.



a) My dryer is not base/clear but enameled and Z2 is for base/clear.

b) My dryer top is in poor condition and rather porous.

c) I don't have my NXT yet.



I'll try a single coat of Z2 as suggested and post results. Keep in mind this test may not even work if Z1 removes the Sharpie. I was thinking about this and I have a few other concerns.



1. I'm pretty sure my dryer does not have a basecoat/clearcoat, as mentioned Z2 is not made to work on this. If anyone feels this will affect results please say so now so I don't waste time.



2. To do a true test to determine if Z2 will hold up to NXT I should wash with Dawn first. If I do this the Sharpie will surely be removed. I'll have to wipe with Dawn first, apply the Sharpie and then use Z1 and Z2.





This short test is getting complicated.:nixweiss
 
blkZ28Conv said:
Removal of ink does not or may not directly relate to a cured polymer sealant resistance to whatever factors (solvent or abrasives) that were involved with the ink's removal.



:xyxthumbs This is what I was thinking.
 
geekysteve said:
Mike,



I'm curious to know what exactly which info was incorrect? I simply compared the two MSDS that were current at the time. I know Meguiar's has a penchant for changing labels based on shifts in the atmosphere, and the change to the NXT MSDS didn't come as much of a surprise.

The information that you posted that was incorrect is the information that you posted where you inferred the two products were the same. They are not. After you posted you incorrect information, I then began to see it show up in other places as, rumor is, word on the street, (etc.) that #20 and NXT are the same



Heck, I have 3 tins of Gold Class that claim different things - synthetic, synthetic blend, beading, sheeting, etc...similar labels on my Medallion bottles...[/i]

That was before I came to work here and out of my control. That said, changes in labeling are common to all business as are changes to formulas, usually to improve both.



It's funny that the product in question received hype that approached rabid levels and we were all led to believe it was going to be the greatest gift to detailing. "No cleaners - none, zip, nada" was one quote...now we've found that wasn't exactly accurate.

You use the word hype, I use the word excitement.



The appearance results speak for themselves. You use your words to position the buzz as hype, while all I did was detail cars and post pictures of the results. Actually, I did more than that, I have held dozens of clinics inviting approximately 30 people to each one, and let these people try the product for themselves. (Why doesn't anyone remember this?). Ask anyone who has attended any of my clinics and I think they will confirm that I don’t try to do it for them, I encourage them to do it for themselves.



I cannot remember a single person that didn't like the results of NXT Tech Wax over whatever product they were previously using, like this Mini Cooper owner.



[b][url]http://www.showcargarage.com/forum/showthread.php?s=&threadid=358&perpage=15&pagenumber=5[/b][/url]



2704nxtoverzaino.jpg




As far as the cleaners, or cleaning ability of NXT Tech Wax, check out this thread and the 3rd message down, which I posted on Posted: 01-17-2004 11:48 PM



http://www.showcargarage.com/forum/showthread.php?s=&threadid=593&perpage=15&pagenumber=5

Mike Phillips said:
Interestingly enough, the first time I have ever seen the MSD sheet for NXT Tech wax was when Steve posted it to Roadfly.org and then compared and contrasted it to #20 Polymer Sealant. I'm not a chemist and have never pretended to be, in fact, most of the time when things get real chemical technical, I try to bring the topic into a more practical discussion of what does the topic of discussion mean on a practical level, i.e. what do we see with our eyes, what do we do with our hands ect.




That's the honest truth. I had not seen the MSD sheet for any of the NXT Gen line until someone PM'd me that Steve had posted it to Roadfly.org and did a compare and contrast to #20.



All the way up to that time, I was led to believe that I was testing, and using a synthetic wax that had no cleaners, no abrasives and thus no cleaning ability.



Somewhere else on ShowCarGarge, (I think), Steve posted some pictures or made some comments about the cleaning ability of NXT. Somewhere, (I cannot locate my response), I wrote, something to the effect of, "Steve may have one on me here".



That too was posted around the time of the above post, i.e. at the end of January. The reason I wrote that was because after Steve posted the MSD sheet to Roadfly, I printed his post out and then discussed it with a chemist. That’s when I found out that, yes, in fact, the NXT Tech Wax does have a very sleight amount of some very specialized cleaners in it.



From the forthcoming NXT Tech Wax FAQ



Does this contain any abrasives?



Yes, NXT is a very specialized formula, which has the ability to eliminate fine swirls without scouring the surface. There are many, many styles and types of “cleaners" and "abrasives� available to use, and Meguiar’s chooses the correct specialized cleaner, or abrasive for it's own unique characteristics depending on the results the formula is intended to accomplish. The materials used in NXT are designed to safely eliminate those stubborn fine swirls, which are troubling to all of us, especially on a dark colored cars.



However, when your finish has moderate to heavy swirls or is neglected you will need to pre-clean the surface prior to applying NXT Tech Wax.



>end of FAQ<



When I wrote and posted that NXT has no cleaners, and/or cleaning ability, to my knowledge at that time, that was the truth as I knew it. I find once in a while someone challenges my credibility because of who I work for. I realize that is something I will never overcome, but honest Indian, I never knew the formula was created to lightly clean the surface. I noticed when using it it did appear to clean ever so lightly, but I attributed that to the application material and the procedure, usually a PC with a W-8006 polishing pad on approximately the 4.0 to 4.5 setting.



NXT does contain a slight amount of a specialized cleaner.



"Longest lasting formula" claims the box (forgive me for paraphrasing, but I'm some 1500 miles from my NXT box) and after appearing to have died after 3.5 weeks (for me), that may not be true either. But now, as people (some critics, some fans) play with it, we're all learning more about it, which I think is great.



For the record, I have never positioned Tech Wax as Meguiar’s longest lasting product, I like to focus on this products ability to create beautiful results. The reason I do this is because it’s just too hard to demonstrate or prove protection and durability. I don’t believe water beading proves protection, I believe it demonstrates high surface tension, and can prove durability. But I don’t believe protection and durability are the same thing. Does that make sense? Just because a product can last a long time by bonding or sticking to the surface doesn’t automatically prove that it is also acting as a protective barrier film to that surface.



See this thread,

http://www.autopia.org/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=25806



I wish manufacturers and distributors wouldn't get so defensive over findings and discussions

Some findings, and some discussion include wrong information. Sometimes this is by accident, but sometimes, it would appear some people have an axe to grind. If wrong, or incorrect information goes unchallenged, then people who read the incorrect information may get the wrong idea, or worse, continue to spread the false information unknowingly. I’m not saying you would do this because a part of your job is to evaluate products in an unbiased and fair manner. This, I would assume, means staying above the fray of innuendos and skewed opinions.



heck, if I were a manufacturer, I'd see it as an opportunity to evaluate my product and I'd try to wring as much free "focus group" info as I could from the whole experience.

I agree. And Autopia and Autopians are an excellent example of this kind of feedback. I would say, if you could win over an Autopian, you could win over just about anyone.



Understand, my passion is to learn things and to uncover truth in an industry that's full of hype and at times blatant BS.

I understand this, and appreciate your dedication. I also agree that the industry is full of hype and at times, blatant BS. I cannot think of a single wax company that doesn’t use some form of marketing hype to sell their products. It’s the nature of the beast and it pertains to more than just wax companies.



Your position is to assist with promoting Meguiar's products (be it through writing, training, or posting on the web), so in effect we're the North and South poles - we may not see eye to eye on things but we share a common passion - detailing.



I’m also in charge of doing my best to correct wrong information. This is one of the hardest parts of my job. It’s also the least fun. I would rather remove deep buffer swirl from a thin factory clear coat under bad lighting conditions.



I hate it when everyone takes my comments so damned personally. I'm not out to get anyone.



Steve, I’m not taking anything you say personally, but I do want to stand up for my side of the story, and when applicable, admit when I’m wrong, or point out where I’m correct.



I was wrong on the no cleaning ability of NXT Tech Wax.



I am correct on the appearance results of the product.



Some call it hype, I call it excitement. NXT Tech Wax takes 99.9% of the cars I have applied it to, to their maximum potential. Not only has it worked for me, but it is working for other people too. The yellow Viper is a good example. I didn’t do any of the prep work, the owner did. I didn’t apply the Tech Wax, the owner did, I didn’t take the pictures, the owner did. I have met the owner of the Viper, and he has given me no reason to believe he is either an experienced detailer, or a highly skilled do-it-yourselfer, (Maybe you are Dave, I just don’t know), as far as I know, he would fall into the largest category of consumers and that is as a do-it-yourselfer.



Time will tell if this is a great product. If it is, it will become very popular. If it isn’t, then I should have my eyes checked and possibly reconsider all that I know about creating show car finishes.



NXT is not a cleaner/wax by Meguiar’s definition, or by my own. A cleaner/wax is a one-step product for restoring neglected finishes by cleaning, polishing and protection in one step. NXT’s best results come from applying it to previously cleaned and polished surfaces. If however, it is applied to a finish that is a little less than perfect, then it will in most cases clean the surface just enough to improve the visual beauty characteristics, as well as insure proper bonding.



This is a consumer product. Most consumers own and drive what I call daily drivers. As such, their vehicles finish, more than likely are not perfect, at least to an Autopians standards. At the same time, unlike an Autopian, most consumers do not want to perform a multiple step process to their cars finish. They want to wash and wax and be done.



I’m sure most of you understand that if you apply a pure wax to the finish of a daily driver without first claying, and cleaning the paint, the pure wax will act to seal in dirt and other contaminants in the paint, and on the paint. This will act to gray or cloud the color and decrease the clarity.



NXT Tech Wax while not a cleaner/wax in the true sense of the word, will effectively clean the surface ever so lightly to insure excellent results for the widest spectrum of users and their finishes.



Because I have found no product that benefits the overall results this product achieves after one or two thin coats, I consider it a LSP, last step product. Now with all of the testing going on out their, I’m open to trying new things. If someone shows me that applying Zaino, or P21S, or Souveran over the top of NXT Tech Wax and it improves the finish in a number of different dimensions, especially under bright lights like direct sunlight, then show me. I’m open to taking paint to it’s maximum potential.





If the MSDS are so critical and raise so much concern, aren't they accurate and telling? But if they're so "vague," then I can hardly understand how they're so "proprietary." It's funny how their relevance flip-flops...one minute they're meaningless and the next they're proprietary and damning.

The whole thing about MSD sheets is they are important, for shipping, storage and safety reasons. But you cannot deduce what’s in a specific product by the information they contain. I too like to read MSD sheets to get an idea of what’s inside a product. But after some recent meetings and discussions on chemistry, I now know that I don’t know very much about chemistry.



I also question anything someone writes based upon what they read in a MSD sheet. That includes you. Your real world tests have more relevance in my opinion.



As for flip flopping, I don’t see it. They contain the relevant information companies and employees need to transport, store and handle safely, but at the same time, they are carefully worded so as not to compromise private information. Meguiar’s is not the only company that wants to keep their formula’s secret. Heck, some companies don’t even make their MSD sheets publicly available. Meguiar’s does this because they are proud of their products and have nothing to hide. (except their secrets and their formula’s, but I think/hope you know what I mean)



What other wax companies make their MSD sheets available online? Can someone make a list? First list all the wax companies that have a website, then list all the wax company websites that offer their MSD sheets. This should be interesting. Who’s leading the way, who’s setting the standard?



I'm simply looking for answers. If I've said it once, I've said it 1000 times - we're talkin' wax, not world politics, right? It ain't worth gettin' all huffed up about...



If I’ve agreed with you once, I’ve agreed with you a 1000 times, we’re talking car wax here folks, not world politics.



I thought I had explained this before at SCG when the last huff was circulating re: NXT. It's obvious the product is important to big M and its assigns, or these little discussions wouldn't grow so out of hand.



First, can we use the name Meguiar’s and not the letter “M�. This reminds me too much of RayGun, (but I’m down with it if that’s what you like).



The huff that was circulating on SCG was started when you did a compare and contrast of #20 to NXT Tech Wax by listing the ingredients in the MSD sheet. It appeared that some people took your tone as one of a killjoy, especially when your posted stated at the end,



http://bimmer.roadfly.org/bmw/forums/detailing/4500186-1.html



[Disclaimer: I'm a cranky, killjoy who strives for the truth and looks past the marketing hype, or at least looks for the hidden message in things. I've also given up caffeine as of this week, so I'm extra cranky and an extra killjoy...] :-)



As previously discussed above,



Understand, my passion is to learn things and to uncover truth in an industry that's full of hype and at times blatant BS.

I understand this, and appreciate your dedication. I also agree that the industry is full of hype and at times, blatant BS. I cannot think of a single wax company that doesn’t use some form of marketing hype to sell their products. It’s the nature of the beast and it pertains to more than just wax companies.




You and I, as well as many others who have spent anytime at all on discussion forums understand that it can be very easy to take something the wrong way. I’ve done it, I’ll probably do it again. I’ve seen others do it in this thread.



Here’s what I do whenever I question how I am perceiving another persons post,



I push my self away from the keyboard and go do something else and then come back to the thread with a fresh perspective.



Most of the time this works. Sometimes it doesn’t and I eat a little crow. But here’s what I know, I’m in this for the long run. Detailing cars is my passion, (actually, polishing paint is my passion, tires, carpets, door jambs, wheels, etc, are just necessary evils), If I left Meguiar’s tomorrow, or if Meguiar’s asked me to leave today, I would still be a part of the world-wide discussion on products and procedures. I’m not going away. For this reason, I try my best to be honest in my posts, and help people to get the best results possible from their time, money and efforts. Anything else is all for nothing.



Helping people get the best possible results from their time, money and efforts is my number one goal, and I hope that most of you here would agree that is the majority of what I have done in the past. I think that’s what a majority of Autopians do here and it is only a handful of people that practice something else.



NXT Tech Wax is a great product in my opinion, and in my experience. Meguiar’s thinks so too. So much in fact that right on the box they say,







Meguiar’s Guarantee



THIS IS BY FAR THE EASIEST CAR WAX YOU’VE EVER USED OR YOUR MONEY BACK. If this product isn’t all we say it is, return the unused portion for a full refund of the verified purchase price.








In my book, (not my actual how-to book, but in my way of believing), this is called, putting your money where your mouth is.



I hope I have addressed most of the issues in this thread. I have to go now, I actually have work to do, for example: Check out this thread,



http://www.meguiarsonline.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=118



I'm going to do my best to help this guy get the best results from his time, money and efforts.



Later....





Mike
 
so have there been any conclusions on whether or not we can put nxt on top of waxes or sealants without nxt removing them?
 
The cleaning ability of NXT is very sleight, not light, sleight.



Sometime today, I will have the portion of the NXT Tech Wax that addresses the ability to layer this product.



My own opinion, two thin coats will provide maximum coverage, protection, and appearance results. Best if you can apply the second coat after 24 hours so that the first coat can completely set-up.



As far as layering in general goes, after 2-3 applications of anyone’s product and all you’re doing is wasting product. Your not building a film build as in a measurable thickness. The idea is nice, but the fact is, your car’s finish can only hold a certain amount of wax before all you’re doing is removing what you apply.



Of course, people have their own opinions on this subject, but I have yet to have someone physically show me 30 coats of any brand of wax that looks better than 2-3 coats, or protects better than 2-3 coats. Of course adding one coat over another coat does use up a lot of product, pretty good marketing ploy if you want to make some money.



Mike
 
Sigh, some people just don't understand the concept of apologizing for being incorrect about something and just moving on. Instead, they insist on defending themself to the very end, continually pointing out the benefits of their product....despite the fact that all those points have nothing to do with the thread's original topic.



Imagine that!... A company that tells the truth about their product....but not the whole truth.. :rolleyes:



BTW, I use the word HYPE.
 
Mike Phillips said:
People reading this can either believe me, or they can believe Steve. Your choice.



Since joining this forum, Steve has consistently demonstrated his desire to debunk the marketing hype behind many of the products we use (His testing of abrasives in Blackfire is still my favorite). He has no affiliation with any wax company and works tirelessly for no money at all to provide many valuable resources to detailing enthusiasts like me and everyone else here on Autopia. He exposes the truth about detailing products and I believe he does so not because he has an ax to grind but because of his love for the hobby. Just my opinion....
 
Mike, you didn't really answer me.



Can we put NXT on top of zaino or klasse sealant glaze without worry that it is removing our previous layers?



thanks



sam
 
Intermezzo said:
Since joining this forum, Steve has consistently demonstrated his desire to debunk the marketing hype behind many of the products we use (His testing of abrasives in Blackfire is still my favorite).

Since joining this forum, I have done my best to answer peoples questions and share with them how to get the best possible results from their time, money and efforts. Steve adds his type of value, I add my own type of value. Would you prefer I stop?





He has no affiliation with any wax company and works tirelessly for no money at all to provide many valuable resources to detailing enthusiasts like me and everyone else here on Autopia.

I have an affiliation and I have never hid from it and my bias is upfront. At least I admit it.



He exposes the truth about detailing products and I believe he does so not because he has an ax to grind but because of his love for the hobby. Just my opinion....



You're entitled to you opinion.



The context of my statement was kind of lost when you only posted the one sentence, here's the rest,



Mike Phillips said:
Because of the incorrect information you posted, I discussed your post on Roadfly with the head chemist.



Then he told me that the ingredients in the new Tech wax were new and completely different from the ingredients used in #20 Polymer Sealant. The MSD sheets are not formula’s. They are for shipping, storing and safety purposes. They are vague for a reason. For someone to dissect one to try to prove something is ridiculous.



People reading this can either believe me, or they can believe Steve. Your choice.



Steve inferred that these two products are the same



You can believe him if you like, that's your choice.



I stated they are not. You can believe me if you like, that's your choice. But we cannot both be right.



When I made an honest mistake, I corrected myself. Steve doesn’t have to correct himself because he didn’t make a statement, only an inference. There’s a difference.



Mike
 
spetulla said:
Mike, you didn't really answer me.



Can we put NXT on top of zaino or klasse sealant glaze without worry that it is removing our previous layers?



thanks



sam



Hi Sam,



Actually I did,



Mike Phillips said:
Sometime today, I will have the portion of the NXT Tech Wax that addresses the ability to layer this product.



As far as your specific question above, I'll guess it will remove some of the Zaino, and some of the Klasse. From my experinece, your finish will look better after you apply NXT Tech Wax over them.



Hope that helps...



Mike
 
Back
Top