Zaino Clear Seal Pictures

joshtpa said:
My opinion is just that as much as I like Zaino products, there are others that do things very well for the look I am trying to achieve. But the "Zaino users" are the ones on this board that no matter what a person asks, the answer is Zaino, and everyone else is wrong. It is like a bunch of fanboys discussing mac vs. pc
Click to expand...



I am pretty sure the answer is not turtle wax. ;)
 
To say or even suggest that DG products are the equivalent of 1950's technology is simply the most innacurate info in this thread. The newest DG products (105 and AW) are FAR and ABOVE better than anything else going OTC, and better than 99% of the "boutique" products that can only be found online. The AW and 105 are brand new formulations and for a spray wax that offers nearly 3 months durability on its own, with outstanding ease of use and looks to boot, is FAR from 1950's technology. Show me another $7 product currently on the market that works as well and protects as well!!!



I understand you all are loving the new Zaino, but to suggest DG is that far off, is quite simply ridiculous. I have used Zaino for more years than many of the people here, and can make accurate comparisons between the two. I can tell you that the newest DG products are far from "out of date" technology. Yes, the CS offers benefits that no other product, including DG, currently offers, but that doesn't make it lightyears better than other products. Some of you seem to be suggesting that DG can't hold a candle to Zaino shine and durability. Well, I'd put a coat of 105+AW against any of the Z products any day of the week, and I wouldn't have to worry one bit that I lack any protection or shine offered from those products that are "lightyears" ahead!
 
silk said:
I will use other products, but I will not guage a product until I have tried it myself ever again.
Click to expand...



I wish everyone would take this philosophy and with "if you like what you are using you have found the product for you. Do not let others perferences deter you form using your beloved product."



One man's diamond may be another's piece of coal.:eek:
 
I will admit that a camera can not pick up the added glow that CS provides. I have tried for days and the pics looks great and stunning, but it will not capture the radiant glow that CS provides. It's something you will have to see and experience in person. I guess we will all have to wait till the 40 Mega pixel cameras come out to capture this glow!
 
Well, I couldn't wait any longer, so last evening I S&W'd my hood and trunk and applied CS.



On the hood I either applied it too thick, or the surface was still too warm because it streaked pretty badly. Even after an hour it did not dry, so, a little while later I shot it with some Z6 and it wipped up to a nice glossy finish.



On the trunk I made sure to use sparingly and it went on real well, then I followed up with a shot of Z8, and it too glossed up real nicely. We don't have any sun shinning around here, so I can't get the full effect, but we are expecting some rain today so I'll see how the beading action is..



I applied CS on top of 476S.
 
Yes, pictures of LSPs are often difficult to discern on the internet, especially when different products have been applied to the same car on different days. Try as one might, it just isn't possible to always capture the exact angle, sun, and lighting in the shots...... especially if the shot of a previous LSP was taken at a different time of year.



All I can do is use the pictures as a rough guide and read what the poster thinks from his experience seeing them both in person. The eyewitness report might be a more valid gauge than the pictures, but everyone loves to see pictures. Anyway, that's how I look at it (pun intended ;) ).
 
CS made my metallic paint pop out even more in the sunlight. I used this pic for my sig on other forums.....



orig.jpg
 
Someone want to setup and or take this Pepsi Challenge?



I’m willing to bet that if we took the top 10 active posters from this board and asked them to distinguish from looks which product was applied to each sample…….the accumulative end result would be about a 50% accuracy rate.



Which interestingly enough are the exact odds one would have for guessing which is which.



Coke or Pepsi boys?



RET





1922pepsi.jpg
 
Like I said, you would think that the Zaino users were debating politics or stem cell research or abortion the way they are so strong willed that it is the best and nothing is even close. Very close minded. But there are a few of us that think there products were great until they found some other stuff....but people have to realize that some people love the look and some people really dont.
 
ret said:
Someone want to setup and or take this Pepsi Challenge?



I’m willing to bet that if we took the top 10 active posters from this board and asked them to distinguish from looks which product was applied to each sample…….the accumulative end result would be about a 50% accuracy rate.



Which interestingly enough are the exact odds one would have for guessing which is which.



Coke or Pepsi boys?



RET





1922pepsi.jpg
[/IMG]
Click to expand...



Initial evaluation would be to easy. AW has a film that can easy be felt after application. CS is complete dry.





Let's perform this test 16 weeks out after weekly washing and no QD'ing and see what the results would be.:grinno:
 
blkZ28Conv said:
Initial evaluation would be to easy. AW has a film that can easy be felt after application. CS is complete dry.





Let's perform this test 16 weeks out after weekly washing and no QD'ing and see what the results would be.:grinno:
Click to expand...



You have basically turned into Billy Maze with an infomercial.
 
It always ok for someone to put a product up against zaino and make claims. But when those claims are refuted or discused in any way by someone who has experience with both products, its never ok.



Mr Joshtpa, when was the last time you used zaino? You claim you don't like the look of it which is fine. But what is your experience level with the product?



Then we have Mr DeiselMDX who said he has used zaino in the past, but has not offered any positive input or help to anyone in this thread.
 
I used it yesterday on my neighbors car. She really likes the way CS shines. So I did her car. Never said I did not like the way it looked. I do not like the way CS looks compared to FMJ. That is just my taste. I love Z5 pro. So dont try and turn this into me being a Zaino hater. I actually really like their products (some of them). I just prefer the look and feel of FMJ and some of Werkstatts stuff.
 
joshtpa said:
I used it yesterday on my neighbors car. She really likes the way CS shines. So I did her car. Never said I did not like the way it looked. I do not like the way CS looks compared to FMJ. That is just my taste. I love Z5 pro. So dont try and turn this into me being a Zaino hater. I actually really like their products (some of them). I just prefer the look and feel of FMJ and some of Werkstatts stuff.
Click to expand...



Thank you for clarifying. I don't have a problem with folks like prefer product A to B as long as they have used both, which you have. :up
 
There may be more value in this discussion if the Zaino crew would read and comprehend the posts before running to defend their view / product.





“blkZ28Conv�: Initial evaluation would be to easy. AW has a film that can easy be felt after application. CS is complete dry.



“RET�: distinguish from looks which product was applied to each sample





“blkZ28Conv�: Let's perform this test 16 weeks out after weekly washing and no QD'ing and see what the results would be





My original Offer still stands.

“RET�: Would you care to bet if $7 worth of AW would last as long as $7 worth of CS?



Thanks

RET
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top