Totally confused about Duragloss....

I personally think the DG 105 shines good , considering its durability and cost. I'm not to impressed with a lot of products mentioned on here but DG and FK have been 2 that have impressed me and don't cost an arm and a leg.
 
Fallguy said:
Does any of the DG stuff have any filling properties ? I have marring marks , only visible in certain lights. Would 111 help over the 105 ?



I was going to switch to a different product line , but I really like the way my truck looks with DG so I'll stick with it.
Click to expand...



I have the same question? I think 105 may have some fillers, does anyone know??
 
Why does DG caution that using AW too frequently will mute the flake? You can use Z8, a similar product, as much as you want.
 
I have never noticed 105 or 111 having any noticeable fillers. you need to polish first. how often is too often for AW? after each wash surely would not be a big deal. unless you wash it every 2 hours or something :help:



I have been using DG for years, I dabble around with different things now and then but DG always seems make me happy, application wise and looks. I am interested in 4* though and will probably purchase one of these days.
 
Bump from the dead here, and to comment on 111 DG's durability.



This stuff on MG #7, topped with MG #26 pure carnuba, has stood up to all the nonstop road chemicals on one of the harshest coldest winters on record. It's april, and still beads well, and shines, even after numerous coin op car washes.



If it keeps shining, hell, I may put off spring detailing a few more weeks.
 
RobD said:
Why does DG caution that using AW too frequently will mute the flake? You can use Z8, a similar product, as much as you want.
Click to expand...



As a general rule waxes are somewhat opaque. Zaino claims to be optically clear.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top