The "Really ?!?!?!?!" Thread

Ronkh said:
Obama doesn’t think rapists, armed robbers, drug dealers are criminals | New York Post
Click to expand...

Once again, something worth discussing was presented in such hyperbolic, prejudicial verbiage as to be a piece of trashy pseudo-journalism. No way anybody who`s not already predudiced against O would pay any attention to that, so it does nothing except make [a certain type of individual] feel good about being anti-O. Or feel good about feeling outraged. OR something...I don`t understand why anybody would read that. I oughta try to remember the writer`s name so I can disregard anything he puts out and make fun of him when "Journalism" comes up in converstation.

"Obama is fighting the war to get criminals closer to you..." Oh, please.

And Obama never even took the position that the article`s headlight trumpets! (Using a softy-buzzword of "justice involved" isn`t claiming not to think [they] are criminals..)

All these Post articles...sheesh. I`m about as anti-O as guy can get, but it [ticks] me off that the idiots writing that [crap] get paid under the guise of being "journalists". They`re about as serious a newspaper as the Star.
 
Accumulator said:
Once again, something worth discussing was presented in such hyperbolic, prejudicial verbiage as to be a piece of trashy pseudo-journalism. No way anybody who`s not already predudiced against O would pay any attention to that, so it does nothing except make [a certain type of individual] feel good about being anti-O. Or feel good about feeling outraged. OR something...I don`t understand why anybody would read that. I oughta try to remember the writer`s name so I can disregard anything he puts out and make fun of him when "Journalism" comes up in converstation.

"Obama is fighting the war to get criminals closer to you..." Oh, please.

And Obama never even took the position that the article`s headlight trumpets! (Using a softy-buzzword of "justice involved" isn`t claiming not to think [they] are criminals..)

All these Post articles...sheesh. I`m about as anti-O as guy can get, but it [ticks] me off that the idiots writing that [crap] get paid under the guise of being "journalists". They`re about as serious a newspaper as the Star.
Click to expand...

Forget the journalistic license and pay attention to what`s gone on... DOJ has removed criminal/felon/prisoner from their talking points and made it "less harsh" so as not to offend them..
 
I`d pay *more* attention had it been written without the (unnecessary) slant.

I agree it`s atrocious, just don`t see why it wasn`t reported without that journalistic license. It`s simply insulting to my intelligence despite my in-agreement opinion on the subject matter. Wh can`t they publish a straight-up/objective/unbiased presentation of that material that wouldn`t make a thinking person :rolleyes:

Eh, to me it`s just more of that "OK, so what`re you gonna do about it?" category. Stir up a lotta outrage over it..fine, well deserved. But now *do something productive to fix it. If you can`t/won`t do something to affect a beneficial change it`s just more pointless fussin` IMO and that`s just a waste of time and effort.

Heh heh, don`t worry...I`ll soon decide that such stuff is a waste of *my* resources and I`ll quit posting my "oh sheesh.." commentary ;)
 
Woman in Austin catches a man taking an up skirt pic of her at walmart dressing room.

She calls police, the officer tells her `we`re not sure if this is illegal or not" so they turn it over to a sex crimes detective. Later they find out it is illegal.

Perhaps the news could have framed that story a little better..
Because all I got out of that was -Austin police doesn`t know the laws- which would hold more ironic value if you lived around here.

Just thought that was quite funny.

Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk
 
Welcome to your new America where people are paralyzed from making a decision due to the fear of being sued or ripped to shreds in the media by SJW`s
 
hhhmmmmmmm


car2.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top