S&W and QEW (as a qd) comparison

dcswd

New member
As requested, here is my review of Spray and Wipe vs. QEW (used as a QD type product)



sw_qew_comparison.jpg


I don’t have any pics of the car that I tried this stuff out on because they don’t really show anything :) The dirt that was on there was hard to capture, am I wasn’t using the best camera anyways.







The spray and wipe is just the standard stuff, I didn’t do anything to it. I filled the other spray bottle with 32oz of water, and I put in half a capful of QEW.



My car was waxed just a few days ago, and it has hardly any dirt on it… just a really light coat of dust.





I have liked S&W a lot when I have used it before. You only need a light spraying of it on an area and you are set. It picks up dust/dirt easily.



Today was the first time that I have tried out QEW in this manner. With a light spray, it doesn’t bead up at all. It lays completely flat on the paint while S&W groups together a very tiny bit at least. When I wiped up the QEW there was no lubricity to be found. S&W has always been slippery. So S&W has the edge there.



At this point I didn’t like how the QEW mix was working so I decided to add another capful to my spray bottle to see how it did. After this, it didn’t seem as watery and I could notice the QEW in there even more now. I think it worked a bit better with a stronger concentration.



So now I’m tired of writing a review like this, so here is an easy comparison thing:





QEW:

Low Lubricity... its like water

Better than S&W at cleaning birdpoo and the like

I think this has a slight edge at cleaning glass.

“holds� to the paint just fine, but when larger quantities are sprayed on, it starts to stream off





Spray and Wipe:

High Lubricity

Not as good as QEW at cleaning birdpoo

Smells better

“holds� to the paint better than qew



Final Verdict: I wouldn’t mind using QEW on pretty clean glass like this. Its better than using harsh chemicals when they aren’t needed and it might be easier to use than straight water. I don’t think its really slick enough to be used in this manner for paint. S&W seems a lot safer and it’s a bit easier to use.



Hope this helps :)
 
Thanks for the great review. I still haven't tried QEW, and I don't think I'm going to as I am very satisfied with S&W. :up
 
Dont get me wrong, QEW is still an awesome product. Just use it as they suggest with a gallon or so of water instead of 32 oz :D



With all of this stuff, we have a lot of inbetween products...



S&W, then QEW if a bit dirtier, and then a full on wash if real bad :). Throw in the California Car Duster and some QD and we have everything.
 
dcswd said:


QEW:

Low Lubricity... its like water



I agree. It is mostly surfactant, not lubricant.





Better than S&W at cleaning birdpoo and the like





My experience is different. If you let S&W sit on bird poo a little while, the poo slides right off.





I think this has a slight edge at cleaning glass.





I find S&W better about not leaving streaks or residue, so I feel it is better for glass.



Thanks for doing the experiment. I don't think I will use QEW as a QD.
 
I just read a report of S&W being smeary, particularly on dark colors. If so, this sounds like a real minus for this product. Given this, sounds like an issue to be corrected
 
Cool review, still trying out QEW, but it seems like a unique wash. Does anyone else get dirty water after 1 pass of QEW? It looks like the dirt is emboddied by the mix. :nixweiss



For birdpoo just get Bird Sh@T Remover. its more suited for that stuff. Also Steve claims with S&W, it removes any soapy residue after a normal car wash, so probably it strips anything foreign from the surface
 
Back
Top