Recommend Camera

I always thought this was a good post. (Credit Ollie18 Focaljet.com)



Consumer Cameras: Easy to use. You regular point and shoot, which does not really give you full control over exposure etc. If any it is very limited. Also at a lower price tag.

sony_dsc_w55_02.jpg




Prosumer Cameras: Way more features than a consumer. Let's you control exposure etc. Has a fixed lens and if other lenses are available, they are converters that are bring screwed on the front. Higher end 'consumer' cameras. Example: Sony F828, Canon G9 etc.

sony828.jpg






Digital SLRs: Lenses are interchangeable. The rest is obvious....

128327610004843750.jpg






That said, the Rebel and D40 are intro level DSLRs, and the xxD/Dxxx are professional level cameras. You've got entry-level (Rebel/D40etc), mid-level(10/20/30/40D etc), and high-level (1D etc). The sky and checkbook is the limit.





Ok. I've always tried to sway people away from getting an entry level DLSR kit because the glass is usually a let down where as a prosumer level camera has all the same features and great glass for the same or a lower price.



Prosumer is like a PC lots of capability, room to learn etc and the finished product good irrespective of the users ability.

DLSR is like Rotary monster capability and flexibility inexperience will produce unimpressive results.



I find using a DSLR in auto mode a bit of a waste it would be like using a rotary with a step once a year wax and then blaming the rotary because it doesn't look as good as the rotary with the correct pad, polish LSP combo.



Just my thoughts but if you have money to burn then I would recommend a canon 40D kit the the 17-85 IS lens and a 70-200mm f/2.8 USM IS and a good tripod It will cost about $4,000 and you can take spectacular pictures. Thats what I use.
 
Anal1 said:
I am thinking about getting a better digital camera. I have been hearing alot about Nikon's. Can someone recommend a good Nikon. Say $350 or under price range? Thx.



You can snag a Nikon D40 + kit lens for $450...and that's a serious value and won't leave you wanting for another camera in the near future!



FWIW, there are tons of great P&S cameras in the $200 range...many, many choices.
 
White_07_G6_GT said:
Ok. I've always tried to sway people away from getting an entry level DLSR kit because the glass is usually a let down where as a prosumer level camera has all the same features and great glass for the same or a lower price.



I find using a DSLR in auto mode a bit of a waste it would be like using a rotary with a step once a year wax and then blaming the rotary because it doesn't look as good as the rotary with the correct pad, polish LSP combo.



I have to agree with this. My point-and-shoot generally produces better results than my D80 in auto-mode. Focal length is generally the controllable variable here, but there's no discounting the results. I discourage a DSLR unless you're really into photography and expect to grow into using it. Everyone I know who's graduated to DSLR - and I'm one heck of a good example - has experienced this: the quality of your pictures will go down before it gets better. How much better it gets is a function of your time and energy. And without such effort, carrying around something so much bigger than a small point & shoot is a pain in the neck.
 
I have a Sony DSC-N1 and it's a great camera. It's no Nikon or Canon (my dad has a D200) but after doing some research some time ago, the Sony DSC-N1 had comparable specifications to its current competition. It's nice having a 3" LCD touchscreen too, hehe.
 
Bought a Panasonic TZ3, the new model is the TZ5. I love it because its almost the size of a regular small point and shoot but still has a 10X zoom lens with wide angle. It takes great pictures and survived my trip offshore to an oil rig :). Somehow I've managed to lose it in my house, but you may want to take a look at it. Prices are definitely under $350. Might want to check out fatwallet.com or slickdeals.net for current deals on whichever camera you want to buy, you can sometimes get some great savings.
 
Panasonic TZ3 for me. The new model is the TZ5 but the TZ3 can be had at a good discount. Essentially its a 10x near prosumer camera in the body of a point and shoot. Small size (comparatively), 10x zoom, 28mm equivalent wide angle lens... It happily survived my trip to an offshore rig, yet I've managed to lose it in my house, doh!



When you decide what camera to get, check out slickdeals.net or fatwallet.com for potential savings...
 
Great thread!



I have the Sony Cybershot and I like it for the value. It take great pics if you take it off Auto and use the settings. I'll pick up a Nikon or Canon when I learn how to really take better pics.
 
tom p. said:
You can snag a Nikon D40 + kit lens for $450...and that's a serious value and won't leave you wanting for another camera in the near future!



FWIW, there are tons of great P&S cameras in the $200 range...many, many choices.



[quote name='Rob Tomlin']Couldn't agree more!



:werd:





[/QUOTE]



Couldn't disagree more. It all depends on what you plan to do with the camera. I had a D40 for less than 2 months before wanting another camera. I outgrew it fast, though I was big into learning photography and have been studying and working on it hard ever since. So....like has been said before, the OP really needs to sit down and think about what he wants to do with the camera purchase and with photography in general.
 
CleanGSR said:
Couldn't disagree more. It all depends on what you plan to do with the camera. I had a D40 for less than 2 months before wanting another camera. I outgrew it fast, though I was big into learning photography and have been studying and working on it hard ever since. So....like has been said before, the OP really needs to sit down and think about what he wants to do with the camera purchase and with photography in general.



In the context of this thread, where some people are recommending the point and shooters, I don' t think the D40 would leave 98% of people wanting MORE camera within 2 months.
 
Rob Tomlin said:
In the context of this thread, where some people are recommending the point and shooters, I don' t think the D40 would leave 98% of people wanting MORE camera within 2 months.



Good point. However, I think the D40 is more camera than what 98% of the people in this thread needs. It is a great camera with really nice capabilities though so I can't knock the D40 too much. Pretty user friendly too.
 
CleanGSR said:
Good point. However, I think the D40 is more camera than what 98% of the people in this thread needs. It is a great camera with really nice capabilities though so I can't knock the D40 too much. Pretty user friendly too.



That I can agree with.
 
The Nikon D40 is one of the best buys for under $500, especially considering that some really good point and shoots these days are $250-450.



If you want a good point and shoot then look at.



Canon A590is, A720IS, A650IS



Panasonic TZ5, FZ8, FZ18, FZ30



Nikon 5100



The newer Nikon point and shoots don't seem to as good as their older ones and have a lot of complaints with being sluggish and slow. The pictures do look good though if you have a tripod.



If I was only looking to spend $200, I would get the Canon A720IS. It has manual controls for more adjustments and is a good starting ground for learning how to use manual modes.
 
Denzil said:
Actually, I was thinking of picking up a D40x myself... I just can't decide what lenses to invest in though, LoL.



I would get two one wide 17-55 range and one tele zoom 70-200ish I'm not a Nikon guy so I don't know their exact ranges. With those two lens you will be covered for most situations. I would get the wide lens first and then see about renting the tele for a weekend before you buy it. I rented my tele twice before I was sure I wanted to spend the extra on the L 2.8. It was an investment that was more than my 40D body cost but well worth the money. Here is great Nikon Forum: Nikonians :: The Nikon User Community
 
First of all do not get cought up in the megapixel race. It is not necessary unless you are blowing up pics very LARGE. Having said that, for a point and shoot I like the Panny FZ series. You get a Leica lens that is 2.8f from top to bottom. Try pricing a lens like that on a dslr and it is a $1000+ easy!



Now if you are serious about photography go spend some time on the following forums and learn just like we do here.



Canon Digital Photography Forums - Powered by vBulletin

FM Forums



If I were to do it all over again I would buy a good used body. People are always buying the latest and greatest and selling their equipment for a song. Fred Miranda site is a great secondary mkt.



Hardmix
 
^ I can't speak highly enough about that lens. Since buying mine the only time I've taken it off the camera was to loan it to a friend. For any Nikon DX owners looking for a do-it-all lens, this is the ticket. It's come down ~ $75 since I bought mine too.
 
VroomVroom said:
^ I can't speak highly enough about that lens. Since buying mine the only time I've taken it off the camera was to loan it to a friend. For any Nikon DX owners looking for a do-it-all lens, this is the ticket. It's come down ~ $75 since I bought mine too.



I love the flexibility it allows. The VR works incredibly well. It's pretty sharp too, especially considering its zoom range.
 
Back
Top