Radar Detector

BLUELINE 1 said:
then you don't have a chance like I said in my other post.
Not exactly, I believe you said it was a waste of money

BLUELINE 1 said:
When it comes to the laser a detector is a waste of money.
and I'm telling you it has saved me money. Not one ticket in the last 24 years and I don't always drive the speed limit. I believe that everyone here is in agreement that there are some instances that you're beat and there is no way to get around it. On other occasions laser detectors are a help.
 
IMO it is a waste of money. I'm glad to see that you have gotten away for the 24 years. If you speed that much you may not want to worry about a ticket, but worry about wrecking and the loss that comes with that which may be way worse than some little speeding ticket.
 
Maxima Lover said:
What was the name of the units you were using?

Were they active or passive jammers?

Do you know how they worked?

I do agree with you on the insurance companies. Some even buy radar units and give them to police to write more tickets. All in the name of safety. :rolleyes:
ill get the name on Monday and PM you. I'd call it active, I had zero input.

They "units" made a readar absorbing field that was 18" in diameter. The installer put one under each headlight and 1 under the front plate. The units were 2"x2"x1" in size. He even installed units IN the headlights of my LS430. He cut the lights open and put them behind the clear cover. Lookes strange but worked.
 
BLUELINE 1 said:
Some of what you have said is what I was saying. I've ran a radar unit for the last 10 years and a lasar for the last 4. The tracking history is only what the deputy has to establish to verfiy the vehicle in question. In Georgia there are 3 things that you must do Id the vehicle and estimate the speed, along with the tone and confirm the speed with whats on the radar. I've used the old units and new also and over the years have seen hundreds of people with detectors get speeding tickets(when the person operating the unit does it correctly). I don't know what your state laws are, but in Georgia a county/mun department cannot stop you unless you are 10mph over the limit. On interstates we will give you 20 over before we even think of stopping you. We only run lasar in areas that are congested not radars because first its hard to establish a tracking history and two the detector will give you fair warning, but from my use with the lasar this has never been a problem. If the officer is positioned correctly(and not somewhere he shouldn't be) then you don't have a chance like I said in my other post.

As far as tracking history, it's non existent here even though the law says it should be.

Wow, that much before you can stop? Here you can and in some places will be stopped for 1MPH over.

I assume you are LEO. What department are you with?
 
jdoria said:
ill get the name on Monday and PM you. I'd call it active, I had zero input.

They "units" made a readar absorbing field that was 18" in diameter. The installer put one under each headlight and 1 under the front plate. The units were 2"x2"x1" in size. He even installed units IN the headlights of my LS430. He cut the lights open and put them behind the clear cover. Lookes strange but worked.

Please do. I'm very curious as to find out how this works. If it is an active unit, you could be facing some nice jail time by operating it on your vehicle.

I'd also like to know how it could protect against Ka-band radar units.
 
As far as tracking history, it's non existent here even though the law says it should be.
The sad thing is there are several departments that don't follow the law when it comes to enforcing it.
Wow, that much before you can stop? Here you can and in some places will be stopped for 1MPH over.
Thats for only county sheriffs not State Police they can and will write for 1 over. State to State is diffrent. I spent some time in Mississippi after the hurricane this past year assiting their local police and was told that there was only 1 county in the whole state that could run radar. Why? I don't know, but would think to cut down on speed traps and etc...This law did not apply to thier state and city police which could use it.
I assume you are LEO. What department are you with?
Yes I am. I work for the Richmond County Sheriff's Office here in Augusta, Georgia. I am currently assigned to the traffic/hit and run division.
 
BLUELINE 1 said:
Yes I am. I work for the Richmond County Sheriff's Office here in Augusta, Georgia. I am currently assigned to the traffic/hit and run division.

Are you more likely to write someone up who you stop that has a radar detector opposed to someone who doesn't?

I like the silver/black scheme on the RCSO cars. Do you have a LED bar on your unit? What percent are those front windows tinted though?
 
Forutnately this radar laser appears to be leagal. It is the one manufacturer by Escort (shifter) but the installe duses additional "laser units".

Just like my signature " Don't shop at Walmart" there are a few "causes" I live by. Let the law be enforced, but dont let insurance companies profit fom it.
 
Are you more likely to write someone up who you stop that has a radar detector opposed to someone who doesn't?
I try to be as fair as possible and treat everyone the same. There has been cases where I have given warnings and tickets to those who had detectors. I try not to be a smart a$$ like many out there, but I'm sure I've made my share of comments to those who have them.
Do you have a LED bar on your unit?
No. Mine is a 2000 crown vic and at that time we were not forced to have a light bar on the top as we are now. Mine is a slick top. The newer cars do have the LED bars.
What percent are those front windows tinted though?
We are exempt from the tint law like most states, but are department no longer lets us tint are windows. I have seen some of our cars with 5% all around. We are a large department about 700 employees.
 
i recently was looking for a new detector and came across this website
http://www.radarbusters.com/

this guy seems to review alot of detectors and recommends the BEL RX65 Pro Radar/Laser Detector or Escort 8500 X50

i don't know if the info is all for marketing purposes but it seems as he test out alot of equipment and has pretty good reviews

he also says he give you $5000 for a passive jammer that works, Radar Roy says they just don't work

maybe you can find some info up here that will help

here is another link with just comparisons
http://www.radartest.com/article.asp?articleid=9090
 
I think this is like saying, "Ill give you $50,000 for a kilo of coke, I dont believe coke gets people so wired!". - Officer Richard Head.

Can you say, "Set up"?

I would imagine some cops are as angry about these laser devices as computer programmers are about global outsourcing. But the reality is the percentage of people with the "real thing" in their car is so minute it is measured in thousandths of a percent.

Imagine reading a headline like this in "Geek Week" or any other random technical periodical - "Ill give you $5,000 for the home address of an IT manager being romanced by outsourcing salespeople, I dont believe it happens!" -John Computer Guy.
 
Most passive jammers have been proven to be fairly hit-or-miss by the various places that test them. Sometimes they work, sometimes they don't.

Several shifters have been proven to be very consistent in being able to disrupt laser, in tests by those same sources.

Shifters are also legal, vs. jammers which are not. :)
 
Back
Top