Accumulator
Well-known member
Rob Tomlin said:Can someone explain what they mean by "spit shine" as applied to carnauba's?
The definitive thread is the one by Nick T. He's been MIA for years, but that thread should be archived and oughta come up with a search on his user-name.
VERY, very, short version: As I understand/recall it, with a *real* spitshine, you pretty much work the wax (using the "spit", as SuperBee364 explained) until it disappears, instead of the conventional method of working it, letting it haze, and then buffing off that hazed residue. There will be *some* hazed/dried residue, but not much at all. As SuperBee364 noted, it's basically the same thing as spitshining your shoes; the spit keeps the solvent action at bay so you can layer products that would otherwise do the "like-removes-like" thing (that's how you get a *THICK* build up of super-thin layers of shoe polish when you spitshine footwear).
My "psuedo-spitshine" is less involved, by far, but similar caveat: if you mess it up you'll have a *VERY* tenacious wax residue to deal with, and it won't buff off easily. Here's how I do it- I put a tiny spritz of wax-friendly QD like Griot's SpeedShine (or you could use distilled water) on the panel, and then work the wax with the PC/Cyclo until only a *very* light residue remains; I work it until the QD/"spit" disappears, spreading out the area of operation as needed as it's easy to get too much spit/wax (sure doesn't take much of either). Then I buff off the barely-there residue.
Results, when everything goes well, include a slightly (very slightly!) improved gloss and noticeably smaller, and much more spherical, beads that tend to roll off the panels. I do *NOT* believe that it helps with effecting any significant layering though, and in fact I suspect that there might even be some slight *decreas* in durability, just from all that QD/wax/buffer-action. But I guess somebody could make a theoretical argument that, done properly, it might help layer waxes. Nothing at all like a regular/"true" spitshine though, which is pretty much *all about* getting such products to layer.