Dynabrade Dual Action Buffing Head

Kevin Brown

New member
My friend Mike bought the Dynabrade Dual-Action Buffing Head:



dynabrade-ad-1.jpg




dynabrade-ad-2.jpg




dynabrade-ad-3.jpg




The aluminum housing measures 4-3/4� in diameter.



dynabrade1.jpg




dynabrade2.jpg




With the backing plate removed, the innards are easy to see.



dynabrade3.jpg




dynabrade4.jpg




When the power slide button is engaged, this latching pin is raised.

This locks the entire housing to the drive, and the backing plate is forced to rotate.



dynabrade5.jpg




When the power slide pin is disengaged, the latching pin is lowered.

The aluminum housing is able to rotate freely. This is set to the random-orbital mode.



dynabrade6.jpg




dynabrade7.jpg




We removed the backing plate to cut the size down. It uses a standard 5/16�-24 spindle.

Our plan was to remove the white foam along the outer edge.

This way, we could fit the Meguiar’s 7� pads to the backing plate.



dynabrade8.jpg




This shot shows the overall diameters of the housing and the three plates we were going to use.



dynabrade9.jpg




The Mirka plate will be used as the primary plate for the 7� pads.

The modified Dynabrade plate will be used as a backup.



dynabrade10.jpg




See? the Mirka plate is nearly identical in size to the plastic part of the Dynabrade plate.



dynabrade11.jpg




This is the Meguiar’s Soft Buff 7� Foam Cutting Pad. It is getting rave reviews.

Our goal was to allow Mike to attach the trio of foam pads to the attachment.

Mike will also be using the So1o Pad system, which wil fit nicely once we are done.



dynabrade12.jpg




An X-acto knife and some hand sanding easily removed the unwanted foam.

Another way to cut the foam is to mount the backing plate onto a drill.

Then, carefully push the X-acto into the foam as the drill rotates the plate.



dynabrade13.jpg




Voila! The plate fits perfectly into the recessed part of the foam cutting pad.



dynabrade14.jpg




The Meguiar’s WWHC7 So1o Wool Heavy Cutting Pad will work well with this machine.



dynabrade15.jpg




Here is a shot of the pad mounted to the machine. You can really see the offset!



dynabrade16.jpg




The slide pin.



dynabrade17.jpg




Wow, what an offset. This machine feature a 3/4� (12/16�) diameter orbit.

For comparison, the Meguiar’s G110 features a 5/16� diameter orbit.



dynabrade18.jpg




dynabrade19.jpg




dynabrade20.jpg




We run the Makita at various RPM settings. It seemed to like 2,700 rpm with this 6-1/2� pad.



dynabrade21.jpg




dynabrade22.jpg




dynabrade23.jpg




dynabrade24.jpg




Keep in mind that this attachment was designed for use with larger pads than we were using, so the counterbalance was weighted accordingly.

From what I understand, Dynabrade spent a lot of time dialing in the balance for 8� and 9� pads.



If you plan on using smaller pads and plates, count on some vibration.

In terms of comfort, the optimum speed setting will be easy to find by adjusting the speed on the fly.

Thanks to the 3/4� orbit size and the power and rpm capabilty of the rotary machine, you will be hard pressed to stop the rotation of the pad in random-orbital mode (even at slower speeds) .



This is a time saver, and if you are comfortable with a rotary machine, you will really dig this baby!
 
Holy whips and chains batman! can you say mcgyver! wow thats looks very interesting!!! i have a dynabrade backing plate hmmmmmm!!!! lol great right up kevin!
 
Ron and I have been using a Dynabrade for 2 years now, even posted up info on it if you do a search.



It's a nice tool but it adds a fair amount of weight to the buffer, it has broken twice but was repairable.



It doesn't have anything much over the Flex orbital....in fact we think the Flex may have more umph.



Anthony
 
Anthony Orosco said:
Ron and I have been using a Dynabrade for 2 years now, even posted up info on it if you do a search.



It's a nice tool but it adds a fair amount of weight to the buffer, it has broken twice but was repairable.



It doesn't have anything much over the Flex orbital....in fact we think the Flex may have more umph.



Anthony



Yeah, but this is the newer model with forced rotation, I was always a fan of the original(except the weight) and am curious to see how much more powerful the newer model is.
 
Anthony Orosco said:
Ron and I have been using a Dynabrade for 2 years now, even posted up info on it if you do a search.



It's a nice tool but it adds a fair amount of weight to the buffer, it has broken twice but was repairable.



It doesn't have anything much over the Flex orbital....in fact we think the Flex may have more umph.



Anthony



Hi Anthony...



If you have been using the Dynabrade for two years, perhaps you have the #61374, which is a random-orbital head only?



This one is switchable and allows you to use a random-orbital mode or a forced rotation.
 
Kevin Brown said:
Hi Anthony...



If you have been using the Dynabrade for two years, perhaps you have the #61374, which is a random-orbital head only?



This one is switchable and allows you to use a random-orbital mode or a forced rotation.



*points up* A little late Kevin....:D
 
gbackus said:
*points up* A little late Kevin....:D



Ahhhhh... I was thinking 'what is he talking about?' :think:



Then I looked back and saw your post!

I get an e-mail notification and I clicked the link to the post and responded... Completely missed that you mentioned the part numbers. :wall
 
Kevin Brown said:
Ahhhhh... I was thinking 'what is he talking about?' :think:



Then I looked back and saw your post!

I get an e-mail notification and I clicked the link to the post and responded... Completely missed that you mentioned the part numbers. :wall



Your response was actually much more informative, I just wanted to give you a hard time :up:
 
Kevin Brown said:
Hi Anthony...



If you have been using the Dynabrade for two years, perhaps you have the #61374, which is a random-orbital head only?



This one is switchable and allows you to use a random-orbital mode or a forced rotation.



Yes, we have the older model......the throw on the Dynabrade is so large that it's hard to see the difference by looks alone.



If the cost wasn't so high on the Dynabrade I would try out the new one but not going to spend the money just to "try it".



Take care,

Anthony
 
blk45 said:
$82 is high? :nixweiss



Sheesh, blk45, I think you and I have been shouting in deaf ears; they must not have seen your post about that place to get DynaBrades for 82 bucks.. Maybe you should delete that post so we can keep it a secret from those that weren't paying attention in class... ;)
 
SuperBee364 said:
Sheesh, blk45, I think you and I have been shouting in deaf ears; they must not have seen your post about that place to get DynaBrades for 82 bucks.. Maybe you should delete that post so we can keep it a secret from those that weren't paying attention in class... ;)



:chuckle: Did you order yours yet?
 
Back
Top