Does expensive wax really make a difference?

I see alot of people talking about using expensive waxes. Does this really make your car look better and if so does this difference wash away after the 1st or 2nd wash anyways?
 
What's expensive to you? Expensive may be 2k to someone but not to someone else...



I've used Swissvax Concorso which is in the $250+ range which is expensive to me, for a wax. Plus, it depends on the "look" you're after. Natty Blue and Pinnacle Souveran both make my black paint look dripping "wet". Concorso on the other hand, made it very "clear" and almost glass like. Also, I think the Concorse cleans VERY WELL, like the dirt can't even stick to it. Lastly, the beading effect it has is awesome. :)



I may not be the best to answer this, as there are users who has used multiple $1000 waxes. FMINUS comes to mind.
 
Waxes have their own unique looks despite what people say. I've split my entire car into 4 sections from back to front and compared similar priced ones and saw a difference in looks in all of them. Each had their own unique characteristics as well. Some might not notice anything but the difference is there.
 
kind of interested in how this turns out--because there has been a plethora of arguments over the notion that most waxes only really have (aesthetically) minimal differences as far as looks go.

in terms of protection, there's UV and repelling (of dirt and water) as well as the other contaminants; longevity also comes to mind

I haven't really seen much in the ways of longevity differences most die out by month 3 or 6 (obviously there are going to be people who consistently reach longer, but YMMV)



So I mean....for ME, I feel like it's greatly a marketing thing(Kind of like putting real gold flakes in your food). That is not to say that the expensive products are complete bupkis,(especially since I've never personally tried the elite tier stuff) because for the price people pay, for it not to perform--you just can't stay in business...





Accum's story comes to mind.
 
Wax won't make nearly the difference that proper claying and polishing will, no matter how expensive it is. Like Mike Phillips likes to say, find something you like and use it often.
 
No it makes no difference. The best result I get has been coming from 4-5 sealant and waxes that are some of the least expensive you will find per application. Any time you search what I use, if I listed, you would find everyone agree on results. everything I use is very durable because it is paint prep that matters for the look.



Preparation of paint, claying and polish like scottwax say is what makes difference in look.
 
To me, expensive is over $50, over $200 in my book is ridiculous. If you are comparing waxes on perfect paint, yes there is a difference, but to your point, most of that disappears after the first or second rain/wash. It seems like the more expensive the wax, the less durable it is. That said, for those saying its all in the prep, I really beg to differ. You can get a great deal of additional depth and glow from a carnauba that you just can't get with any prep work.



I've used some of the mid range Zymols and CG stuff and Pinnacle as well as lots of everyday bargain waxes. If you want that initial hit of wow, you will get it with something expensive. However for daily drivers, those looks are gone fast and it seems like the more expensive the wax, the more oil rich, and the more it attracts dirt. That said, if you love waxes, you should try Natty's Blue, Autoglym HD, CG50/50, and Pinnacle (in that order) before you go nuts and order something more expensive.
 
It would have nothing to do with being any times better. It's about if it offers something no one else does.



A f430 isn't 3 times faster than a z06 is it? A Veyron is not 14 times faster than a z06 is it? They sure cost multiple times more than a z06 but they are different and you can't get what a Ferrari or Bugatti offers in a z06 so if you want it, you gotta pay it cause you're not getting it anywhere else.



$7000? I'd sure like to hear (and see) how that would be worth it. Is it 200+ times better than a good $20 or $30 one?
 
I am absolutely convinced that 99% of "look" is prep. I have tried many different waxes on my solid black S2K but the single biggest improvement in gloss, shine, gloss, and wetness came when my car was finely polished. But that being said, I think (I think) that I saw a subtle difference in the paint when I applied, on different occasions, Vintage and Souveran, as compared to other protectants I have used. I think. But as others have noted, this difference (if it in fact exists and is not a figment of my imagination) disappears after the first wash, if not sooner. With all respect to eyezack87, I am dubious whether 99% of folks could discern, would discern, can discern any difference whatsoever between waxes on a well-prepped hood. I certainly do not question, sir, that you saw a difference, but I do question whether most of us would see a difference in a blind test. And I have tried my share of good carnauba waxes (Vintage, Souveran, Fuzion, SV Best of Show, Midnight Sun, Harly Wax). As I said, I think I saw a subtle difference with Vintage and Souveran, but I cannot swear to it. I love Fuzion but I bet that in a blind test most (all?) folks could not tell the difference between a car that has been waxed with Fuzion and a car that has been sealed with Blackfire Wet Diamond. Last week I sold my unopened tub of 50/50. Why? Because I finally realized that the quest for the holy wax-grail is futile and utterly subjective. No matter what wax I use, my cars look great, as long as I have prepped them properly. I'm sure 50/50 is a wonderful wax (and I regret that I never tried it), but I'm even more convinced that I will be just as happy with the waxes I have already tried and own. I just hope that AutoGeek is still around to refill my tub of Fuzion, should I live long enough to use up my present tub. :)



And having said that ... I still have unopened tubs of Victoria Concours Red and Lusso Oro, both of which I intend to use next spring/summer. Perhaps they will convince me that a real difference exists between good waxes ... but I doubt it.



My name is Al ... and I am a recovering wax addict.
 
Jean-Claude said:
It would have nothing to do with being any times better. It's about if it offers something no one else does.



A f430 isn't 3 times faster than a z06 is it? A Veyron is not 14 times faster than a z06 is it? They sure cost multiple times more than a z06 but they are different and you can't get what a Ferrari or Bugatti offers in a z06 so if you want it, you gotta pay it cause you're not getting it anywhere else.



^^^^^ +1.



"Worth" is relative, always has been and always will be.
 
eyezack87 said:
Waxes have their own unique looks despite what people say. I've split my entire car into 4 sections from back to front and compared similar priced ones and saw a difference in looks in all of them. Each had their own unique characteristics as well. Some might not notice anything but the difference is there.



:p:p:p You shd've asked someone to do that experiment on your car without telling you what was done. Then, when you see the car....I'm sure the results would be interesting.



I've done lots of blind tests on nuba'ed cars and my test subjects were always car club members who're very fussy about their cars. In most of the tests, I was surprised by the response..........:)
 
.......Does this really make your car look better.....



"Better" is a very subjective word.

Pro detailers look at a detailed car and efficacy of detailing products in ways and perspectives that could be wildly different from how you look at things.

Do you think Prince Charles' Camilla is beautiful?????



To my customers, a SHINY detailed car is a nice car. Some use the word "glossy".

To a layman, the presence of lots of reflections gives the impression of "shine/gloss".

I have seldom seen a lay person (no knowledge in detailing) appraising a detailed car in terms of depth, richness, warmth etc. It's almost always the "shine":)



Think of a professional wine taster or sommelier vs the occasional wine drinker.



That's why, when you put a detailed black car next to a detailed silver car, most laymen would be instantly (mainly) attracted to the black one. Lots of reflections = shiny!



To me, the price of the wax is irrelevant.

If it produces the looks that puts a smile on your face (without you knowing what product it is....very important), it's YOUR product and you shd use it consistently.

The trick is to nullify any psychological biasness due to any prior knowledge..and you'll be surprised!



I'm a heavy Swissvax user, and based solely on my blind-testing conducted over the years, I ended up using only Swissvax Onyx and Concorso exclusively from the Swissvax range. If the series of blind-testing revealed that my customers and fanatical detailing friends could not see any significant differences, then this is the ONLY truth for me.



I also blind-tested loads of Dodo Juice stuff.....and based on car club detailing fanatics and enthusiast customers, I ended up buying and using only Dodo Orange Crush.

Don't ask me why....I ONLY believe the results of non-biased, blind tests:):):)
 
I've had more then a few calls from clients who where offered $300 wash, clay and an application of a $8000 wax. For approx the same price, I educate them on a wash, clay, one step machine polish and quality sealant.
 
A $300 wash, clay and wax is pure marketing. For good or bad. Was the company OSS?



Regardless, if that owner wants $8k wax he's gonna pay the $300. lol
 
Jean-Claude said:
A $300 wash, clay and wax is pure marketing. For good or bad. Was the company OSS?



Regardless, if that owner wants $8k wax he's gonna pay the $300. lol



Good point, for the pro's this can be a huge money maker, a fool and his money are soon parted. Nothing like a very expensive wax to help get that process underway.
 
gmblack3a said:
I've had more then a few calls from clients who where offered $300 wash, clay and an application of a $8000 wax. For approx the same price, I educate them on a wash, clay, one step machine polish and quality sealant.



Excellent money-making scam.

Highly effective when targeted at ignorant, well-heeled car owners who think big $$$ = something special...especially when the wax is applied using palms..WOW!!! what a novelty!!! Hmmm...I've seen that somewhere on youtube!! (LOL LOL LOL!)



But....this is effective only in the short term, and effective only on cars with superb paintjobs that don't need any correction at all.

Too bad we don't do new Bentley Continentals everyday for 365 days(!!!)LOL!



Once the car owners find that the 8K wax won't remove their scratches and swirls....they'll just stop believing this scam.



Let's face it....most customers seeking detailing....what's their PRIMARY motive??? Gloss? Nice clean looks? Nahhh...IMO, they have seen some kinda crap on their paintwork (fine scratches, swirls etc) and expect those to be rectified. The gloss etc are mostly secondary.

So, when an 8K wax could not address their issues......the scam stops being effective.



In many countries, one of the top names in carnauba uses a similar tactic.

They induce/encourage the car owner to buy that $xxxx wax, keep that in the detailing shop's refrigerator, and charges the customer for each application of the wax. Not a bad idea, eh??
 
Jean-Claude said:
A $300 wash, clay and wax is pure marketing. For good or bad. Was the company OSS?



Regardless, if that owner wants $8k wax he's gonna pay the $300. lol



They never told me the name of the company who offered, but its a good chance it was.



yakky said:
Good point, for the pro's this can be a huge money maker, a fool and his money are soon parted. Nothing like a very expensive wax to help get that process underway.



I would never sell a client something like that for $300. A month or two down the road and the finish is dead, sure they will call you right back.



I'd offer instead a coating like OS or Cquartz.
 
Back
Top