1st off, welcome back to Autopia Renny and thank you for commenting on this discussion. I see you’ve chosen to start a new screen name instead of using your prior one? Regardless, I’d like to address your response as precisely and professionally as possible in order to not only clear the air, but in attempt to rectify any of my prior negative dialog directed towards you moving forward. Forgive me if anything I posted offended you as it is not my intension. A few members and I may have gone a little overboard with the way these 2 people suddenly joined the forum to promote this product in the way that they did. I’m all for free discussion of any and all products and clearly kept this thread open in order to give these people adequate time to explain themselves which they clearly did not try to do even after multiple days passing. I’d hate to have someone Google these products and have this discussion pop up even after allowing them to vindicate their actions.
rennydoyle said:
I test and evaluate a ton of products as many of you do. I DO NOT SELL or endorse these products, I test them, simple as that.
Even though you might not have directly endorsed this product, your followers in this thread sure seemed to have grasped the concept that you do? To me, their actions seemed as a poor attempt to spam the forum. Especially when the same member posted the same link to your video in back to back posts.
rennydoyle said:
Search my sites, you will not find the promotion or endorsement of any one line other then those that I work with on large, sponsored projects, it's as simple as that. DITEC is a nice product, I will give it that and I did enjoy working with it as I do with many products on the market today. Is that so bad?
Not at all, but care to explain what makes this product so nice? This may only help people’s perception of the product which couldn’t hurt at this point.
rennydoyle said:
The Audi project mentioned in this post was brought into the shop for a couple who was working with me that week, Gerry and Lauren were very interested in the DITEC line and the staff at DITEC engaged me to gain my opinion and possibly train their detailing centers within the art of proper detailing. That is the extent of the relationship. Of course, I wanted to see how the product performed and was given a wonderful opportunity to do just that, use the product, test it and evaluate DITEC from the professional detailers point of view.
I was very critical of some of the statements and claims that DITEC was making and openly shared that with DITEC staff. I was also a tad alarmed at the cost of the line but with said, DITEC has a very niche market and those who do have the product applied, are usually very loyal to the brand.
Probably so, but these poster’s pitch here obviously didn’t make a positive impact for theirs or DITEC’s image. Don’t you agree? It’s pretty close to textbox spam to me. Especially when one of the poster’s IP address is on the Domain Name System Blacklists? Again, not something I’d want to be associated with in my professional business.
rennydoyle said:
DITEC did get my attention so I made the DITEC gang a nice little video for being supportive of my challenge to test their line and I was pleased with the outcome. Is that so bad? Did I sell the system? Am I promoting the system? Am I whoring myself out for it as some of you made it sound like? NO, go to my site, I never mention the line, I simply tested it and if a couple of you haters take issue with that, so be it as that is what those of us passionate about detailing do, we test, evaluate and make wise decisions from our findings.
Not quite sure about your “haters” remark, especially if it’s directed to me? What products you choose to test is obviously your business, which I’m totally fine with, but what I take issue with is how the people in the thread posted your video as some testament about how great the product is. And by my prior explanation how the video shows glorious before footage and mediocre afters really doesn’t give the product reinforcing credibility from a “passionate detailers” perspective. If you feel otherwise then by all means elaborate so I can understand how it has.
rennydoyle said:
I evaluated the DITEC line, I performed an overview on the application process and shared that process with Gerry and Lauren and I am age and durability testing the product at this time. I also have another five product lines that I am doing the same with, that is simply what many of us that are picky do with products before we are willing to adopt the products into our systems.
I respectfully agree and would love to find out how the product actually performs compared to how it is pitched to perform.
rennydoyle said:
To install DITEC, you need to be a licensed service center as I understand it and I am NOT a DITEC service center, I performed testing, evaluation and provided my input and concerns as they asked. I do the same with many, including Jason Rose of Meguiars, Shell Oil, who has owned many chemical lines, DRC pads, Lake Country, who I have given input on items for years, Grit Guard, Ragg Topp, CAR Products, Flex Tools and other hitters within the industry. Like many I you, I also do an enormis amount of testing on my own and test endless lines each year.
Ok.
rennydoyle said:
One person challenge I would remove the video? I won't as it's not about a product, it's about what two brand new detailers did with that car. Also, DiTec may or may not be attractive to us as pro level detailers but why would I assassinate a line, that is not me and it's not professional. You and I as professional detailers test many main stream products we may not like, but others may like it and someone worked hard to develop that product and I simply will not assassinate a line as some do within a public forum, it's just not my thing or my way.
Forgive me for being so critical, but how does the video show what these people did when the afters are not truly exposed? Nobody ever asks for a product to be assassinated, but people (detailers and manufacturers), rely on detailers (especially pros) to be as truthful as possible when testing a product. The last thing I’d want to do is buy a product that a well known detailer has tested just to find it to be sub-par or nothing special. Besides seeing the outcome in person, nothing better reinforces the findings of a product or a person’s abilities then after shots that truly allow people to compare and contrast from the befores that were taken. I just feel that the video doesn’t do that. Sorry, just my opinion.
rennydoyle said:
This product is only a protective and beautification product and the corrective work Gerry and Lauren did on that vehicle was amazing. Like any other product that protects or deepens the paint system, that products results are only as good as the foundation we create during the corrective stages of the project and these two brand new pro detailers did an amazing job and the video was more about their achievements on the car.
“Brand new pro detailers”? That’s an interesting characterization? Like you stated, I’d be willing to bet that 99.9% of anyone that knows the 1st thing about paint correction will agree with you that what goes on top of the paint is minuscule compared to the foundation created below it. That’s why when someone praises how great a sealant/wax turned their paint finish around it raises a lot of red flags.
rennydoyle said:
For you haters, I pity you as your lack of professionalism I am sure is a major stumbling block within your career and life. For those who responded with professionalism and respect within this post, thank you for being true pro's. Some of you I have met and know and thus you and I don't need to prove anything by being e-thugs hiding behind a key board. Pro's like you and I are true professionals dedicated to the art and the business of detailing.
No comment as I think my comments above are as professional as possible. Looking forward to your replies and further contributions….