Setec Astronomy
Well-known member
Relaited said:You are making my point that most in this industry are technicians, not business people. 2 days on a detail ... 6 hours perfecting paint ... holy cow, that is embarrassing from my point of view.
And, let's say I accept your logic, that most autopians are like you ... then in aggregate, you are all an issue. Law of big numbers
You will see, the regulators will fix this as I agree this is the dominant view of those here. That's why I share these threads with the regulators, so they can get a sense of what the industry really thinks.
Thanks for making my point.
Do you actually read anything here? This is not a car wash site, it's an OCD anal-retentive 99.9th percentile site. If you share this with regulators, you are giving them a completely skewed version of what "detailing" or car washing is about. If you look at the stats, we only have 3000-odd active members here, many of which are like me, who have never touched a car other than their own, family, or friends.
What people are pointing out here...well...no, I wouldn't want to drink the runoff from my car wash, even if I'm only using biodegradable detergent. I likewise wouldn't want to drink the runoff from the street in front of my house. Why? Because it's full of road salt, brake dust, tire dust, dog piss, oil drips, garbage, and oh, did I mention, it's made from a petroleum product, asphalt?
Anyone who approaches this from an "engineering" point of view (or is that a "technicians" POV?) can see that your car doesn't "capture" anything but a small fraction of the brake dust and rotor rust, and virtually none of the tire dust, not to mention fluid leaks, etc. The idea that this stuff is only released when cars are washed is ridiculous.
That being said, and I think I posted this same thought earlier in the thread, is that it's a difficult regulatory challenge. Obviously no one wants to feed motor oil to fish, so you can't ALLOW it, but at the same time, it's going on all around you. So what do you do? You make laws against it, but you only selectively enforce the law...when someone is doing something blatant.
Do you truly, truly, believe that if there were no one washing cars outside without water reclamation, that it would even make a dent in the amount of brake dust going down the storm drains? Where is the hue and cry about the over 200 million pounds of salt we put down on the roads here in NJ this winter? Maybe we should have a law that all new vehicles should be hybrids so that instead of bleeding off energy by the friction of brake pads, it could be recovered as electricity instead of spreading particles all over the road. Or maybe there should be a law requring everyone to have Blizzak tires in the winter, so they wouldn't have to salt the roads?
Common sense would indicate that vastly more vehicle "dirt" is deposited onto the roads from normal driving than is done from matless washing...do you have any statistics to back up your assertion that it isn't?
I don't think any of us think pollution is good, what we are responding to is the hypocrisy of being told that you can't wash brake dust off your wheels, but you can drive around all you want spreading it over the countryside. It would be different if you said "you can't wash it off, AND you have to put this double-stick tape on the inside of your wheels to catch all the dust and once a quarter bring it to the brake dust recycling center where they will carefully remove it and properly dispose of it, and put new sticky stuff on". Show me some legislation that is as gung-ho about getting brake dust off the roads as they are about getting it off of my wash sponge.