maecrispy
Obsessed... who me?
blkZ28Conv said:EX-P is not a requirement for a great looking final result. As mentioned several times WG looks great alone. Also this combo would be difficult to do for clients because of the prequisite curing time for the WG (min of 24hrs). Nevertheless, if you apply EX-P to your personal vehicle they may question why your car has the extra "POP". :nixweiss
The process and its repeatibility is quite easy. Top WG with EX-P. Maintain with EX-P until time for paint maintenence (clay/SMR/cleanser) . Use WG paint cleaner or AIO and re-apply WG sealant. Repeat cycle.
Next week I am doing a customer's (friend) black Chevy Silverado Extended Cab ($$).
The process I will use is Scott's polish/ AIO/ and EX-P and compare to the WG/EX-P. :wavey [/B]
Hmmm... that sounds easy enough then. I'm thinking of it as a maintianence thing. I can then tell the customer to just purchase EX-P if they want to self maintain and then bring it back for a refresh once paint needs work.
I would be *very* interested to hear how your AIO/EX-P combo works as well. I have the Klasse twins as well but as I understand it, they're acrylic whereas WG is silicone based. I don't know what EX-P is. Does it even matter?
Anyway, I appreciate the advice!
I are teh ROCK!!!