Why do you foam

If you have decent water pressure, you can use a BHB with the foamgun for the initial passes (instead of using a mitt) and save a fair bit of time (and avoid needing to use so many mitts).



The foamgun will flush the BHB clean and you won't have to rinse it out very often. But used properly this combo won't get things perfectly clean (too gentle) so you'll still have to go back over it with a mitt/foamgun to get the last bit of dirt off. This BHB/foamgun bit is strictly for a first-pass, to get the majority of the dirt off.
 
Why do I foam?



1) Because the pros at Autopia do it! (Monkey see, monkey do)

2) I like the way it looks when the car is all foamed-up

3) I like the slick feeling

4) It makes my neighbors wonder what I'm up to
 
OCKlasse said:
It speeds up a wash...tremendously.





I disagree. It usually takes me more time. Down here, I can't let anything sit on the paint more than 2 minutes without causing major streaking, let alone pre-soaking the entire vehicle. 1/2 the soap would be dry before I washed 1 side. Unless you're pre-soaking your vehicle with heavy cleaners, I don't feel it loosens up any dirt. It might help loosen up bugs, buy plain water does that too. I see a foam gun as a tool that has the potential to eat through tons of product without delivering anything more than a novelty.
 
So what is better? Foam gun(hose) or Foam cannon(pressure washer). I know about foam gun brands. What is a good foam cannon?
 
loudog2 said:
So what is better? Foam gun(hose) or Foam cannon(pressure washer). I know about foam gun brands. What is a good foam cannon?





Foam Cannons are "better." Due to the fact that it will product a much thicker/clingy foam to rid dirt from the paint.



Foam Cannons are just basically foam guns hooked up to a power washer. I forget the name of the power washer; but people from the UK use it a lot. Also they use Snow Foam over across the pond.
 
Personally I believe the foam gun to be a fad, this though is only my opinion.



So to get to the real meat of this we need to ask if the desire of a "foam gun" is to cover the vehicle in "foam" with the thought that the foam is acting as a pre-cleaner then just how effective is "foam" as a surfactant?



In other words, is the cleaning power within the foam or rather is foam (suds) the by-product of the car wash formula?



Suds, in and of themselves, do no cleaning. Suds are added for the eyes and piece of mind of the consumer because we associate suds with cleaning but it's not suds that clean but rather the surfactants. A cleaner leaning more on the alkaline side can literally have no suds yet be a very effective cleaner. So bathing your car in a thick sheet of foam has only a mental benefit.....and it may look kinda cool.



Then the argument might be that "suds" are the lubrication, they lift and encapsulate the dirt thus giving a safer wash. This though is also more mental that actual. If the above be true then we must ask how is it that products such as 4n1 and ONR can clean so effectively without suds? Thus, suds are neat and cool but they are not necessary in the area of cleaning.



If you still need to agitate post foam, then you are much better off going straight to the aggitation and skip the fun, but oh so environmentally unfriendly foam soak. Using a no rinse product or waterless wash will do as good a job, will not induce any marring when done according to directions and saves so much water, and waste, no to mention time.
 
reparebrise said:
Then the argument might be that "suds" are the lubrication, they lift and encapsulate the dirt thus giving a safer wash. This though is also more mental that actual. If the above be true then we must ask how is it that products such as 4n1 and ONR can clean so effectively without suds?




Let me say I agree with what you are saying, one exception:



ONR working well and Suds working are not mutually exclusive as you imply in the first part of this paragraph. That is, both suds and using a product like ONR can lubricate as well as clean.



Thus, suds are neat and cool but they are not necessary in the area of cleaning.

Agreed. They are not necessary, however in my experience suds/foam do in fact work well.
 
loudog2 said:
So what is better? Foam gun(hose) or Foam cannon(pressure washer). I know about foam gun brands. What is a good foam cannon?



foam cannon will give you thicker, longer, clinging foam. the foam gun can be used as a pre-soak AND while you're washing, so it can serve two purposes. everyone has their own way of doing things, so you'll have to find what suits you best...
 
I have not noticed any benefit of using a foamgun with regular car washes like Gold Class or NXT. I sometimes use my Power washer with a foam cannon and that works better, but I have different soap in it that is designed to be used for this purpose(Kärcher brand) But i guess it's not good for the LSP in the long run at least.
 
Accumulator said:
When I use the foamgun in a way that speeds up the wash, I get marring; doing *anything* in a remotely time-efficient way always leads to marring for me :(



But when I use it in a time/labor-intensive manner it greatly *reduces* the wash-induced marring.



This is indeed what I have found too with extensive testing of foaming products used through a foam gun (Autobrite Foam Lance with pressure washer). I have tried several foams and have found that the higher foaming foams tend to do less than the foam which produce a "runnier" solution on the car which has less iof a dwell time but will run off the paint - wetting the dirt and lifting a notable amount of it in my experience.



However, as you rightly point out, this is not to be seen as a way to speed up washing - it should be considered as a way to aid marring free washing but removing as much of the surface dirt and grit (at this time of year) as possible before a mitt comes into contact with the paintwork. A foam with the ability to wet this soiling can also loosen and remove it as the foam runs off, and rinsing afterwards further removes the loosened dirt better than rinsing alone with plain water - this has been demonstrated numerous times but does slow the wash process up as you do have to take your time and be careful to get this stage correct. Using a warm water pressure washer further increases the effects of foam in my experience.



Indeed, quite often I will spend a good 20+ minutes on foaming alone... foam the car, allow to dwell for five minutes, rinse and repeat if necessary and sometimes depending on the time of year a mitt wash is not needed but just now in winter, this leaves a nearly clean car for the mitt wash to finish. I use foam from a company called Bilt Hamber in the UK, which for me have produced a foam which is not thick but rather a little runnier but seems to clean more effectively than others I have tried.





David Fermani said:
I disagree. It usually takes me more time. Down here, I can't let anything sit on the paint more than 2 minutes without causing major streaking, let alone pre-soaking the entire vehicle. 1/2 the soap would be dry before I washed 1 side. Unless you're pre-soaking your vehicle with heavy cleaners, I don't feel it loosens up any dirt. It might help loosen up bugs, buy plain water does that too. I see a foam gun as a tool that has the potential to eat through tons of product without delivering anything more than a novelty.



Something I have always thought about the use of foam guns is that they must be region dependent - living in the UK, it rarely gets warm of sunny enough to worry about this and I wash my cars indoors in any case which further lessens the issue but outside in hot sun, I would be sweer to recommend foaming for the reasons you have mentioned.



However, I would not go as far as to say that foaming does not achieve anything more than water alone does in all conditions - certainly not where I live or in my washing conditions, where prefoaming does loosen road film and aid the cleaning process as well as helping to remove surface dirt and grit (yes water does this too to an extent, but I have found in my experience that foaming achieves a better result and has in testing reduced the amount of marring induced when I switched to non-ideal mitt wash methods to really put foaming to the test).



Some foams for me, as I have alluded to above, present nothing more than novelty value and these would appear to be the ones that procue a thick, almost shaving foam like foam on the car - look cool, cleans sod all. Whereas a runnier foam that wets the paint and dirt more has greater effect so product choice in this respect is important... Dwell times are also key with the foam I use, leave it for 5 minutes and you'll get a better result than leaving for one minute: and this brings us full circle back round to your issue of weather conditions, as I imagine leaving a foam to dwell for 5 minutes in the Florida sun is akin to dousing the car in concrete and watching it set!! So its very much weather and wash condition dependent.
 
i agree with DAVE , ans also foaminh help you to make touchless wash, great finish , but i ask DAVE if dwell 5 min maybe strip your wax if use strong shampoo?
 
Dave KG said:
Some foams for me, as I have alluded to above, present nothing more than novelty value and these would appear to be the ones that procue a thick, almost shaving foam like foam on the car - look cool, cleans sod all. Whereas a runnier foam that wets the paint and dirt more has greater effect so product choice in this respect is important...





agreed......
 
Eh..there are a lotta different ways to use different types of foamers and I think it's wrong to generalize too much.



If I hadn't cut my wash-induced marring down to basically zero, I sure wouldn't bother doing my washes the way I do. Note that it took *dozens* of washes, with countless variations in technique, to get my method sorted out to my satisfaction (and even now I can instill marring with a moment's carelessness). Had I given up after only, oh...twenty-some washes with the foamgun I would still be polishing at least once a year.



Hey, I *did* give up after the first ten or so foamgun washes, but then I spent some time thinking it out and approached the idea from a different perspective (over the course of those dozens of experimental washes). Heh heh, I had to do *more thinking* and *less detailing* to figure it out. No, it's not rocket science but over-thinking a problem isn't as common as under-thinking it.



Here's a little food for thought: when I use the foamgun in conjunction with the two-bucket method (and *NO* pressure washer,which would *really* help me out!), I can wash a large, *filthy* vehicle like my metallic black DenaliXL and end up with not only no wash-induced marring, but *HARDLY ANY DIRT IN THE RINSE BUCKET*. Think about that...fairly clean rinse water after washing a filthy truck...where'd the dirt go? What did *not* happen was the dirt getting caught in the wash media/dragged across the paint; when I rinse out my BHBs/mitts there's hardly any dirt in them, it got flushed away by my foamgun.



OK, OK...[Accumulator climbs down off his soapbox :o ]
 
I'll echo Dave's sentiments above. I used to foam a lot but while it removed some debris and particulates from the car, I couldnt say it actually cleaned much. It probably softened and loosened dirt ahead of a wash, making it easier to remove without much effort...



I then started testing the Blt Hamber foams above and found that they do actually clean as well as foam and while I like to use ONR washes when I can, I have also adopted a foam0only and blow dry regime for winter, to minimise the wash induced marring that is inevitably worse in winter.



Run-off is a BIG issue though, although generally something that is not an issue in the UK. We dont YET have the same restrictions that seem to be commonplace in certain areas of the US, regarding washing and run-off, although the laws regarding waste disposal already in place do apply to detailers/valeters. Last winter, in the colder days, I had foam residue stay on my driveway for 2-3 days and in some instances it froze and stayed longer. My new preferred foam dissipates much quicker and the residue wont survive a rinse, although I have also noted using standard shampoos like DG901 in foam guns produces foam that can dwell a lot longer as well...



I have also started to try something close to Accumulator's process, and foam the vehicle and rinse it off, then make up a mix of shampoo solution, apply to the car, wash with my mitt/GS and then rinse it through with the foam lance. Nowhere near the level of dedication/detail as Accumulator but it does work well :D



I still foam a lot, although am trying to cut it down, and hope that next summer will eliminate it in all but the most contaminated cars :)
 
Back
Top