I consider it to be aggressive marketing when someone with a financial interest in a product writes an article about paint care and has it published in Miata Magazine, recommending sealants (his product) over waxes (the competing product), and then the product shows up at Miata Forum vendors with the tag line, "As seen in Miata Magazine!"
I'm not saying the product is good or bad, just that that type of marketing raises my eyebrows a bit.
Maybe it reflects more poorly on the magazine than the product. However, one thing I've learned here is that there is no one "truth" relating to which product is superior. I've decided to find out about CQS, maybe try it out a bit. But geez, I have so much stuff on my plate waiting to be evaluated. I still have to do the Crystal Guard.
I have a product right now (Auto Guard) that is phenomenal at protecting the surface against acid rain, UV, etc; the only problem is, it looks kind of lackluster. If you weren't Autopian it would look OK, but what good is that?
Also: how important is aditional UV protection for modern finishes? I'd guess that it's kind of far down the list of attributes I'd want in a product, but I have no idea if that's true. If I'm wrong, no big deal.
Tom