tripper_111
New member
I agree with the previous post. #26 provides more depth than NXT and I guess this fact is sometimes OVERLOOKED.
#26 may not be as wet as souveran, but it's a killer in terms of depth or something that darkens the paint while adding slightly oil-wet look.
EDIT:
I don't know if I'm the only one noticing this. But as far as I notice, red and dark blue seems to provide the wettest look possible if properly preped...anyone?
black paints tend to be more reflective but not as wet as a properly preped red paint....
#26 may not be as wet as souveran, but it's a killer in terms of depth or something that darkens the paint while adding slightly oil-wet look.
EDIT:
I don't know if I'm the only one noticing this. But as far as I notice, red and dark blue seems to provide the wettest look possible if properly preped...anyone?
black paints tend to be more reflective but not as wet as a properly preped red paint....
I was looking at the pics of the cars... I would be proud to drive any of those rides ! ! ! But the funny thing I think, is the lighting, cars look different in terms of reflectivity, gloss and "special effects" in different lighting. No joke intended, but certain colors seem to be daylight, twilight, and night biased. My car looks best in twilight conditions, lots of indirect lighting that picks up the metallic in the paint and also highlights the sculpting/gloss of the car. At night I get this lumious effect, partly due to the color of the car under the red dominant sodium street lights. I daylight I see the clarity and metallic aspect before the gloss. I think lighting and how light effects the look of the car cannot be ignored. If you look at the pics, you will see different conditions of ambient lighting or the direction of the reflection at play. It is difficut to get real comparisons of product except for how it makes one feel. Maybe thats what FMJ refers to as an "emotional shine". I am just rambling-sorry if I bore or offend- :xyxthumbs