What camera?

I think the Nikon D3000/D5000 have the edge is overall usability compared to the Canons but the recent Canon (XSi) is better than prior Canons in terms of simple access to all major options (if you wants something beyond Automatic mode).



Canon does have the reputation for great lenses and Nikon has the reputation for great bodies. If you just want a camera, most any kit (Canon or Nikon) will work if you leave it on Auto, if you explore the controls and a beginner, I lean toward Nikon. But, the camera will not likely be your limitation.



Disclosure: I have used a Nikon D70s and own a D90. Used to be a Canon fan.
 
Got_Leather said:
I have this tripod. Very Sturdy and goes up to 5 feet. I have no complaints.



Tripod Here



Mine looks very similar to that. I know it's not rocket science but if my camera swivels when i try to turn it on its side i must be doing something wrong.



Any tips for setting it up as far as attaching the camera to the base of the tripod goes?



I feel like a fool to ask such a question but better to be safe then sorry and have a shattered D60 on the ground.
 
When I actually remember to use the dang thing I rock on with a Sony Alpha A300. Between Todd Helme and trying as he might to give me some solid pointers when I first got it and Barry trying to teach me a few things recently I'm hoping I can up the quality of mine here this spring.
 
I bought a Nikon Coolpix 8800 several years ago and love it. However, with the invent of the DSLR, I have been looking at the D90; but as stated above, I am just waiting for the price to go down a little bit and for me to save up more money for it.
 
lecchilo said:
I'm very jealous of your photos, especially now knowing you have the same camera! What lens do you use?



Hey Ivan, how have you been buddy?



I use a Tokina f/2.8 16-50 AT-X PRO mainly, and sometimes a Canon ef35mm f/2



Even with a kit lens though, you can take some really good shots if you have the right composition and exposure. Your photos need to tell a story, and that story comes from your eyes, not the camera. Once you figure out how to work the controls of the camera so that it projects the story you wish to tell, then your photo quality will go up considerably.



I am not a professional photographer by any means. I've not had any training on photography...just picked up a few books, and snapped a whole lot of photos to learn how the different settings effect the final look. If there are any pro photogs out there looking at these, I'm sure they could criticize them and tell me what I could (should) have done better.



I also don't do any post-processing with my photos other than to re-size them, and add a border. I use a simple (free) program called Photoscape. Other than that, they always come straight from my camera to your screen.



Here are a few examples:



For this shot of my new kitten (Charlie), I wanted to capture the look of curiosity on his face because kittens are always looking to get into something. The important thing here was to get down to his level (most people make the mistake of taking photos of pets and kids from above...you need to get down to their level). I used my ef 35mm lens because it has great bokeh (blur of background) so that I could focus just on his face. I also utilized the edge of the basket he was standing next to to give me a vertical "anchor" of sorts in the left 1/3 of the photo. I still could have done a little better job of the composition, but kittens move quickly and I needed to snap the shutter before he was off getting into something else. I put the camera in AV, and set it to f/2.2 so that it would work well in low lighting, and to give plenty of background blur. I knew how I wanted it to look with the aperature that I chose, and simply put it in AV mode to let the camera do the rest of the exposure calculations since I had a subject that was less than still. In the end though, I was real happy with the way it turned out. By the way, his eyes were focused on my Boston Terrier (Spike) that was in the other room.



IMG_6569.jpg




And now for some simple eye candy. Most of these shots are just from obscure angles and parts of the car, but the composition is what makes them stand out. Pretty much all of them were taken with a tripod with small aperature (high f number) to get as much of the photo in focus as possible. When doing this though, your focal point is critical. These shots also utilize a custom white balance based on the lighting in the shop.



I liked this one because everything in the interior is pretty much in focus. The "California" logo is captured on the screen, and if you look closely, you'll see the yellow F430 that is in the passenger side mirror. This required a long exposure time, and could only have been done with a tripod.

IMG_6207.jpg




I set this one up so that it went diagonally from corner to corner, and I used a large aperature (low f number) so that I could focus on the prancing horse, while leaving the foreground and background blury. This was hand-held.

IMG_6211.jpg




On this 360 Spider, I grabbed a ladder to get a different perspective, and since I couldn't use a tripod, I set a higher aperature with a fast shutter speed to prevent blur caused by hand shake. Once again it's a diagonal presentation and gives a good feel for the lines of this beautiful car. The back of the vehicle is a little out of focus, but that's OK because I really wanted to focus on the interior and the area just behind it.

IMG_7046.jpg




This is a great example of obscure shots of the car. It's just a tail light, but the composition and presentation is what makes this photo. When you look at this one in full resolution on a large screen, it looks tremendous. The light itself is composed in the top right third of the shot (rule of thirds), and the body seams run diagonally from corner to corner. I also used a small aperature in full manual mode to make sure that everything was in focus.

IMG_6221.jpg




On these last couple of shots, I'll just let you look over them and think about the composition and the focus to see if you can figure out for yourself what I was trying to capture (based on what I've said in the above shots/info). There's no need to reply with your findings...just something to get you thinking a bit.

IMG_7040.jpg




IMG_6245.jpg




And Labster...I'm not trying to hijack your post here. I just wanted to share a little info and some examples about composition and exposure.
 
Todd thats a great shot of your kitten. I like the way you showed the pictures. Once again it goes to show that while certain tools help us. You have to understand all area's if you want results. What I got out of that was, I cana beginner detailer with all the right tools, It doesn't make me a pro. It just means I have the tools. Just like your pictures, You can have the best lens and camera, but if you don't know how to use them its worthless. I can tell that you spend a lot of time mastering every aspect of the business and not just the detailing end. Thanks for a info.
 
I am in favor of a Nikon D90, however, I already have a D40 in 4 years ago. It is terrific experience to use Nikon's DSLRs. Canon's should be OK too.
 
I had both the D40 and D90 and were very happy with both. If you are on a budget, look at the new D3000. The noticeable difference between them all is the iso. The D90 can shoot at a much higher iso, where the D40, D60, D3000, has a tad more grain at higher iso.



I looked at some pics between my D40 and D90, and it's hard to tell them apart. The D3000 replaced the D40, so you know it's a great little camera.
 
I've got a Sony Cybershot WD-80 (or whatever the model is, don't have it right in front of me) that does a decent job. 7 MP and shoots video.
 
Here's the camera I have: Panasonic DMC FZ18



I wanted something that had a good image processing engine that created a digital image exactly the way I saw it. Ths has the Venus 3 which is awesome. I wanted the lots of Optical zoom. This has 18x. I wanted to have complete manual abilities but also some good built in settings. This has that plus the ability to shoot in RAW. I didn't want something to drain my time or have to carry a plethora of lenses and crap around all the time. This is nice and simple.



I really wanted a nice DSLR with all the whistles but realized it was too much. I'm not a photgrapher hobbyist and I just like nice photos. I like nice equip and good products and this fit all my needs. I have used it for 2 years and have taken some really nice shots. Even at night....this has the ability to shoot 1600 ISO with no loss and up to 6400 in a high-sensitive mode.
 
TSC17 said:
And Labster...I'm not trying to hijack your post here. I just wanted to share a little info and some examples about composition and exposure.



No problem man, honestly it was nice to see some explanation about composition :hi5:
 
2 Questions:



1. How much are you willing to spend?

2. Outside of photographing cars, due you plan on using it everyday in your personal life? If so, do you mind using a DSLR or prefer something less obvious.



I personally, would get 1 of the u4/3 camera's. Pana faster focus, Olympus in-body stabilization. 95% as good for the average to enthusist shooter vs. a DSLR but way more pocketable.



If you want a stealth cam, then nothing beats the Canon S90 or Sigma DP1s/DP2.



As for a DSLR.. I'd probably go with a lower end Canon (probably used) and get yourself some really great prime-senses like a 35L.
 
paco said:
2 Questions:



1. How much are you willing to spend?

2. Outside of photographing cars, due you plan on using it everyday in your personal life? If so, do you mind using a DSLR or prefer something less obvious.



I personally, would get 1 of the u4/3 camera's. Pana faster focus, Olympus in-body stabilization. 95% as good for the average to enthusist shooter vs. a DSLR but way more pocketable.



If you want a stealth cam, then nothing beats the Canon S90 or Sigma DP1s/DP2.



As for a DSLR.. I'd probably go with a lower end Canon (probably used) and get yourself some really great prime-senses like a 35L.



I'm trying to stay in the $500 range. I can get the Nikon D3000 for about that from bhphoto
 
Looking at your pics and Todd's pics make me drool a little. I'm gonna order a book or two from amazon about composition. What camera are you using Ry?
 
Labster said:
Looking at your pics and Todd's pics make me drool a little. I'm gonna order a book or two from amazon about composition. What camera are you using Ry?



Thanks!! I still wish i took my camera gear with me to the great white north to take some pics.



In that pic I posted I had used a D40. I sold that and bought a D90, but I just sold that one. I am unsure of what I want next, but I know for sure I am sticking with a Nikon because of the color reproduction and sharp accurate focus which always pleases me. Out of 10,000 plus pics, I have never had a pic out of focus.
 
I'm trying to negotiate a guy on a Canon XSi right now. Has less than 1000 pictures taken on it and I think I can get it for $400 to maybe $425 shipped.
 
WAS said:
My vote is a Canon Rebel, but I actually use a Powershot Digital Elph from Canon for my pics. I'll be looking to change that soon though, the Elph is getting worn and tired.



I have a digital elph that I use for just carrying around when I need it and a digital rebel which I am going to be trading in for a new one as soon as I can for the video capabilities (which are almost identical to the Canon D7). Also have my Iphone in case of emergency but it's a pretty mediocre camera.
 
Back
Top