Sweet Night HDR-esque Shots of my 2011 Ford Fiesta

Lumadar

New member
To be clear, they are not true triple shot HDR shots, but they are raw shot 25 second exposure (night shots), and raw high quality day shots.



I think some came out REALLY cool. I have them hosted in a "set" on Flickr for my Fiesta Movement Live Feed work.



Check them out...leave comments there and here if you are feeling generous



Ten Sweet High Quality Shots of the FIESTA <-- Click THIS link to see the PICTURES!



Thanks!



Mark Kleis

AKA Agent 67
 
No love? Geese. Did anyone look at the high res version of the night shots? I thought they were pretty sweet...
 
They are cool shots...but, more importantly, would you buy this car if you weren't part of Ford's promotion. I am curious about your impressions since you have had it a while.



Have you detailed it yet?
 
Is Ford paying you to post these here???



I like the car (Ford needs this Stateside ASAP), but I can't deal w/ those graphics.
 
gamby said:
Is Ford paying you to post these here??



They get the car for free for a time, insurance cost included and have to go on 'missions' for Ford. One of which is probably taking pictures and putting them online. But like the other responder said, I'd rather hear some real impressions of the car.

Maybe throw some LSP on it and post some closer shots.

They are kinda small distant shots and generally I don't click on the links to see pictures in a photo album elsewhere, I'm click lazy that way.
 
zmanz said:
They get the car for free for a time, insurance cost included and have to go on 'missions' for Ford. One of which is probably taking pictures and putting them online.



Eesh--I can just hear the douchey marketing guy in a conference room at Ford getting all excited about that idea. "HAY!!1! We can use the int3rw3b to do 'alternative marketing'--the kid will love it!!! Someone make me Facebook page"



:rofl
 
mack4000 said:
They are cool shots...but, more importantly, would you buy this car if you weren't part of Ford's promotion. I am curious about your impressions since you have had it a while.



Have you detailed it yet?
Yes, actually, I will buy it when they release it with the "sport/Aero kit" which may be year 1, or year 2. I do not have an immediate need for the car since I have a very nice 2006 hatchback Focus with all kinds of mods, BUT, this car is such a pleasure to drive I do want one.



I have washed it several times, and applied UQW, but that is it.



Why? Because Meguiar's and I are possibly going to film some work I do on the car to demo products and I don't want to fix all the holograms it arrived with just yet...



gamby said:
Is Ford paying you to post these here???



I like the car (Ford needs this Stateside ASAP), but I can't deal w/ those graphics.
No, they are not paying me. I am posting because I love the car, and Ford, and thought I would share it with fellow auto enthusiasts.



The car will be here in June 2010 for sale. The graphics aren't that bad, but I know what you mean. A couple edges are peeling so I just might take them off myself.



zmanz said:
They get the car for free for a time, insurance cost included and have to go on 'missions' for Ford. One of which is probably taking pictures and putting them online. But like the other responder said, I'd rather hear some real impressions of the car.

Maybe throw some LSP on it and post some closer shots.

They are kinda small distant shots and generally I don't click on the links to see pictures in a photo album elsewhere, I'm click lazy that way.

It wasn't a mission to post pictures, but you were right about the rest. I just like sharing the car...and I thought the pictures were pretty dang slick.



As for impressions, I have posted extensive info and created a FAQ on another forum if you are interested. I will also have a blog up soon that I will have more focused on answering questions and sharing my thoughts on the car.



To sum it up though, the car is a blast and a pleasure to drive. Ford hit a home run with this car.



idrift4wd said:
love the car!



very lucky to be choosen!
Thanks! I am lucky, and honored. It means a lot to me to say I am part of the launch of Ford's first world car. It's an experience of a lifetime. :spot



gamby said:
Eesh--I can just hear the douchey marketing guy in a conference room at Ford getting all excited about that idea. "HAY!!1! We can use the int3rw3b to do 'alternative marketing'--the kid will love it!!! Someone make me Facebook page"



:rofl
Do you know Scott Monty? Or any of the other social media experts at Ford? If you did, you probably wouldn't throw words around like that.



They know what they are doing, it is a brilliant plan, well thought out, and being recieved extremely well.



In fact, Ford was just recognized as being the most social media/tech savvy automaker in the US- the Fiesta Movement was a big part of that.



Mock it all you like, it is great, SMART business.
 
Pics are cool, looks like you found a nice place that has different bulbs (incandescent/florescent) to give off different colors. I love taking night photos its gives it the 'HDR' look of being dynamic, but doesn't stack up to a real properly shot HDR photo. Again cool pics!
 
SonicBlue05GT said:
I wouldn't relate the car to the word sexy unless there was a hot girl with it.



I think even that would be a stretch.:LOLOL



"I set out on a mission: capture the beauty, sexiness, and style of the Fiesta. Mission accomplished. "
 
NSXTASY said:
I think even that would be a stretch.:LOLOL



"I set out on a mission: capture the beauty, sexiness, and style of the Fiesta. Mission accomplished. "



To each his own... :woot: it's the best selling car (or 2nd best, depending on month or source) in all of Europe. It's going to be the most gas efficient pure gas car in the class, and the best "driver's car" too.



It got 5 stars from Jeremy Clarkson. He flat said he loves the car and thinks it is a great looking and performing vehicle.



Top Gear has done 3 different episodes on the new model alone. Considering their typical disdain for "American autos" I would say that is pretty impressive.



The snooze fests with sub-par mileage (Honda fit 27-33 MPG? LOL) coming from over seas are the ones to :LOLOL at.... but hey, maybe that is just me :clap:
 
The Honda Fit styling blows that thing out of the water. There are still connotations of low quality and lame styling with the Fiesta name IMO. What sells well in Europe doesn't mean much in the states...
 
I got a new Fiesta as a loaner and what impressed me the most was that it handles great and it's still comfortable. The interior looks better in the pictures than it feels for real. But for a small car it's pretty good.
 
American compact cars are a joke. At least with Honda, the Civic has been around forever. With Toyota, the Corolla has been around forever.



With the American brands, they use a name, until the car becomes the joke of the segment (Escort, Cavallier), then come out with a replacement with a new name. Kind of hard to build buyer loyalty when you know the car you buy will be axed and renamed in several years. Also doesn't help resell any.



The Fiesta may be a nice car, but I'll take the rock solid reliability of a Civic SI (as well as the resell) any day.
 
Tasty said:
The Honda Fit styling blows that thing out of the water. There are still connotations of low quality and lame styling with the Fiesta name IMO. What sells well in Europe doesn't mean much in the states...

LOL. Really? No offense, but I think you may be the only person I've ever seen say that.



In my opinion, the Fit has ugly bug-eye headlights, awful, terrible window shapes that lend itself well to the horrific roofline. The car looks like a bubble about to pop! It's so tall and awkward it looks like it is about to tip over while standing still if the a small gust of wings picks up... but hey, maybe it is just me.



Of course there are negative connotations...the last Fiesta in the US was a total piece of junk. But what's your point? Are you saying the new one must be too since they share the same name, and nothing else? :confused:



As for the idea of what sells in Europe VS US, you might want to clarify in what sense? In the sense that sales trends in Europe may not be reflected in the US? If so, I agree. But I'm not sure what your point is? Are you saying that it doesn't matter that the Fiesta is such a strong seller in Europe at all? A place where the subcompact and compact cars reign supreme, and buyer standards are much, much higher.



If it meets their standards, I would think that would be quite a good thing for us...no?



Mark77 said:
I got a new Fiesta as a loaner and what impressed me the most was that it handles great and it's still comfortable. The interior looks better in the pictures than it feels for real. But for a small car it's pretty good.
I love the driving dynamics over anything. It's refined, yet sporty.



As for the interior, I was actually terribly unimpressed with the pictures, but extremely pleased when I got inside the car. As much as I love my French-stitched leather seats, I thought the cloth interior styling was very cool, too. I almost would have preferred it...almost :p



weekendwarrior said:
American compact cars are a joke. At least with Honda, the Civic has been around forever. With Toyota, the Corolla has been around forever.



With the American brands, they use a name, until the car becomes the joke of the segment (Escort, Cavallier), then come out with a replacement with a new name. Kind of hard to build buyer loyalty when you know the car you buy will be axed and renamed in several years. Also doesn't help resell any.



The Fiesta may be a nice car, but I'll take the rock solid reliability of a Civic SI (as well as the resell) any day.



With all due respect, I couldn't disagree more.



For one, you started with the classic and typical outdated statement that everyone uses to justify purchasing foreign cars. Well, 5, 10, or 15 years ago, I would say you had a point. But not anymore. Ford has been tied with Toyota and Honda for 1st in initial quality for over 2 years, and recently PASSED Honda. If you factor in blatant owner bias (from people who like you insist their Japanese cars are perfect and will last forever, and from owners of American cars who hear constantly how their cars are inferior and are programmed to believe it) I would guarantee Ford is actually AHEAD in true initial quality.





Times are changing, and people can continue to ignore that all they want, but reality will keep adjusting itself regardless of outdated perceptions. I spend considerable time tracking the media's coverage of the auto industry, as well as social media. I have seen a MASSIVE shift in the general response of people towards Ford in the last 6 months alone- in a year, it will be even bigger. Two years, larger still. People are starting to get the great new (safer, better built, more efficient) Ford cars in their hands and as time goes by the public will slowly learn, just like they did with import autos as they slowly passed American autos.



Furthermore, you mention how Corolla and Civic nameplates have been "around" forever- so what? A name is nothing more than a name... they have nothing in common what-so-ever to the cars of yesteryear. But if you want to put stock in that, you could make the same exact argument for the Fiesta. The Fiesta has a LONG and storied history in Europe and around the world. It's a time-proven favorite and it only gets better with each iteration (as proven with recent sales records).



I will agree that IN THE PAST (I live in the present) that American autos have rested on their laurels and let models die (don't forget the Ranger, or Taurus). BUT, again, times are changing. They are not living in a world where they can just sell big trucks and ignore everything else anymore.



Your comparison of the Civic SI and Fiesta is, well, interesting, but hardly applicable. I could buy a Fiesta, twin turbos, a race suspension, wheels, tires, and a custom intake and exhaust for the price of the SI... and still get considerably better mileage, too. Pretty worthless example though...apples and oranges. (Compact sport model vs subcompact economy car?)



As for the resale value, expect that to change as well. It already started with independent groups and sites like KBB stating that they predict future resale to be stronger for models like the F150 OVER the Toyota Tundra. Toyota and Honda are now turning towards fleet, while Ford is turning away. Toyota and Honda just got caught resting on their laurels (Toyota just took a multi-billion dollar bailout from the Japanese govt..both posted first losses in years) while Ford is gaining market share and is generating more buzz in social media and normal media than ANY automaker due to their exciting and upcoming products.



It all ties back into my main point: perception is lagging behind reality. That lag is the cause for the problem with resale value (in addition to market dynamics like chasing fleet), and as it catches up and shifts, so too will the resale value.



That's my opinion anyway :har:
 
I sense a little bit of hostility in your post above^^^. You sure you aren't getting paid by Ford???



Funny that the American automakers like to point to initial quality all the time. To me, I am more concerned with long term quality than initial quality, as I keep a car longer than a couple of years. When it comes to compact and subcompact cars, the American cars historically just don't hold up as well as the Japanese models over the long run. That is part of the reason the American car resell values are so poor. You say you live in the present vs the past....if you are like me and you keep a car for a long time, you have to look at the models from 5-7 years ago, and how the majority of them tend to look at the current time, to try to guage how the current model year cars will look several years down the road. Maybe 10 years from now we can look back and say that it is the opposite, but for now, I have to judge on what I have seen in the past.



I still disagree with you about the names. It is very hard to build consumer loyalty to a particular model when the manufacturer changes the names constantly. If names weren't important, then why did Ford change the name of the Five Hundred (which wasn't selling well) to the Taurus? Obviously they wanted to tap into some of those loyal Taurus buyers from the past. For most Americans, they probably have no idea what the Fiesta name represents overseas, but are very aware of the Civic and Corolla names. Case in point, I have an older friend who saw an article about the Fiesta coming back. He said, "I hope it isn't as bad as that piece of junk Ford sold here back in the late 70's and early 80's". I told him that the Fiesta had come a long ways since then, and was known as a nice vehicle overseas. He was oblivious to that. I have to think he is more representative of the majority of the population.





I am not making the blanket statement that all American vehicles are junk. I am however stating that I think the Americans have given us a lot of poor examples of compact and subcompact vehicles over the years, and have a tough road ahead of them if they want to become the class of the field in those categories. I do agree that the full size American trucks are better. I would take a Silverado or F150 over a Tundra or Titan any day. However, I'd take a Tundra over a Ram. On the other hand, I wouldn't drive a Ranger or Colorado if you gave me one. They are waaaaay behind the Tacoma and Frontier in my opinion. Heck, the Corvette, new Camaro, and some Mustang models are much nicer (especially for the money) than a lot of these Japanese supercars (like the Nissan GTR).



At the end of the day, cars are like wax - buy and use what you want and what makes you happy.
 
^ agreed. even if the American cars are deemed to be 'better' than the Japanese cars, it's already too late to change the perception of the general population due to the absolute crap vehicles they put out for way too long.
 
Back
Top