black bart
New member
Re: suds-less wash?
Maybe I'm being misunderstood.
I'm not claiming that no suds is better but I'm saying that I don't think that a lot of suds is a indication that it is better either.
People associate soap with suds but what does the suds do for you other than hide what you are trying to clean and in most cases make it harder to rinse.
S&W proves you don't need suds to clean.
Yes that is correct I use a small amount of soap but I think the 4-1 adds to the performance of a soap.The post where you mentioned that you added the 4 in 1 as a conditioner with your soap, I remember, but......
Are you or anyone else using it or ONR as the only product mixed in the wash water for a conventional wash?
Also, I don't see what the advantage would be by having a sud-less wash.
I can understand some saying that the suds don't add anything to the performance, but are they taking anything away from how the soap works?
![]()
Maybe I'm being misunderstood.
I'm not claiming that no suds is better but I'm saying that I don't think that a lot of suds is a indication that it is better either.
People associate soap with suds but what does the suds do for you other than hide what you are trying to clean and in most cases make it harder to rinse.
S&W proves you don't need suds to clean.