imported_Aurora40
New member
Accumulator said:I'm currently experimenting with THIS SHUTOFF from Griot's. Because it positions the user's hand farther back from the foamgun, and is grasped in a different way compared to the smaller rotary shutoffs, it does *not* offer the sort of control that the smaller shutoffs do. THis means it's not as good for the mitt-balloon technique on the top horizontal surfaces, but it works *great* for vertical surfaces and for most other foamgun techniques. Very handy for use in conjunction with a BHB. The downsides are that it doesn't swivel (use the brass qds for that) and that it doesn't seem to offer as full a flow as other shutoffs when wide open. This isn't a problem for me with my boosted pressure- I still don't get the maximin volume but I do get pretty much- plenty of suds from the foamgun, more than sufficient. But you'd have to try it with *your* pressure to see if it works OK for you. This is one of those things I'd previously dismissed, didn't think I'd like it at all; man was I wrong about that!
I am using the foam gun in my left hand. I find it's hard to turn a knob very well. I also find that having to do something to stop the water is counterintuitive. I like a squeeze shutoff because it's intuitive. Squeeze more for more water/foam, less for less.
So I got these two to try out:


The metal thumb-valve has a very small hole, but it seemed to spray ok. In reality I don't need a lot of volume of water, just a continuous stream through the foam gun onto the area I'm washing.
We'll see how it goes. I'll probably need a second QD like you said so the valve will swivel. The thumb-break one also has very little travel, so it might be hard to have fine control over it. :nixweiss