Which statement is more accurate - a PC produces better results than hand application, or a PC produces results more quickly & easily than hand application?
The most successful & best-known of the hand-application crowd is probably Scottwax, who has a thriving business & tons of photos to prove his prowess of hand-detailing vehicles. I may be wrong, but I thought I read that all of Scott's work is done without the benefit of a PC. Yet, his work is as impressive as any on this site. :up
W/ all the great testimonials of the PCs, I've always wondered whether stunning results - not just shine, but scratch & swirl removal, etc, can be achieved by hand. I know it's not possible to quantify w/ any accuracy, but how much more effective is a PC is at surface prep as compared to hand application - 50% more effective, 25%?
The most successful & best-known of the hand-application crowd is probably Scottwax, who has a thriving business & tons of photos to prove his prowess of hand-detailing vehicles. I may be wrong, but I thought I read that all of Scott's work is done without the benefit of a PC. Yet, his work is as impressive as any on this site. :up
W/ all the great testimonials of the PCs, I've always wondered whether stunning results - not just shine, but scratch & swirl removal, etc, can be achieved by hand. I know it's not possible to quantify w/ any accuracy, but how much more effective is a PC is at surface prep as compared to hand application - 50% more effective, 25%?