NEW McKess 37 pollen X

^^Thanks in advance for sharing your experience.

Accumulator, I’ve never seen tons of marring from cleaning pollen (although perhaps I caused some really light swirling). A few years ago when I started RW and WW, I went at the pollen all through April and May, 3-4 times a week, and it was sometimes a very yellow layer. When I polished later that year it’s not like there was a ton more swirls to correct vs now when I let the pollen sit or only bucket wash.

In conclusion, I think what convinced me to only bucket wash or leave it during April/May was the scary microscope pics of pollen. Those pictures put horror in my mind, but as you mentioned, I don’t know that those sticky spikes really do much extra marring compared to normal road or garage dust. They may be soft for all we know.

The above is my experience only. I do not recommend smearing pollen into your paint to test my theory.
 
Our pollen season is over, but it was extremely bad this year. Really had me cussing up a storm. I just don’t know how this will react with the LSP you have. I hope it’s nice and glossy. This is one product I would like to see the msds on. It’s got to have some anti-static properties. If it was tested in Florida it should work for me. I think I’ll wait for a few reviews before purchasing though.
 
I’ve been waiting to wash my truck until the Pollen-X arrived. The pollen was really bad and wouldn`t you know it we had the hottest day in a while. The bottle and web site for Pollen-X don`t say anything about using it in full sun, so I thought I would give it a try.

f730ea998604c0a069ad658e649e3e04.jpg


917c3ba83770127cfddfb0c6e1d38752.jpg

The product gets really streaky in the heat.

ab7c9b35a89b3d9febecf16a24d9befa.jpg


feb214a32f077ded441f8bfc5111951f.jpg

I hit the left side of the car with Adams waterless wash and the right side with Pollen-X. The AWW was much easier to use on hot paint.

cd1ad20ffd7539387407164a4f8d30eb.jpg

I also tried this on a vehicle parked in the shade. The product was a lot easier to deal with.

A few hours pass...

02be2b9358434ce57627331b3a313463.jpg


13552a9ada81ea728e77f92125845b79.jpg


After a couple hours there was pollen accumulated on both the AWW and PX sides.

So... I don`t know what this is for. It`s not as good of a waterless wash as their other products, and for whatever reason I`m not seeing the pollen resistance.
 
bofh said:
After a couple hours there was pollen accumulated on both the AWW and PX sides.

So... I don`t know what this is for. It`s not as good of a waterless wash as their other products, and for whatever reason I`m not seeing the pollen resistance.
Click to expand...

Lol. Shocking.

I`d expect a product like this from Chemical Guys. Not McKee`s.
 
The smear from using Pollen X in the hot sun even survived a strip wash. Had to hit it with APC and three different towels to buff it away.

363aa168a43c5e2617d80494f8d9f778.jpg


I don’t think Pollen X has earned it’s shelf space, sadly. LOVE the rest of the M37 product line though.
 
Hmm read the description of the Pollen-X. It`s like a waterless wash for pollen in mind. And the protection left behind is more to prevent the pollen to stick to the paint in as bond. So what I get out of that is that`s you don`t necessary gets less pollen on the paint when your vehical is parked. But it`s not should bond and being easier to blow off when you drive and the sticky pollen ones is easier to rinse off. The first application it`s recommended to apply 2 layers so you get a more stout application of it.

The problem with these kind of specific products is that it`s useally a to high of expectations from them. And that there can already be products that does the same. Also the brands can claim to much from the products and gets your expectations up to high.

Would be interesting to see how it works after a week when it`s time for the useally wash. If you get a lower build up of pollen vs the LSP you have like a 50/50 test. And if the pollen rinses off easier than the other LSP does.

bofh did you take off all of the Pollen-X or just where it smeared and didn`t take of the fingerprints? And did you drive the car and looking for any difference from the pollen build up. Lastly did you apply the recommended 2 layers for the initial application?
 
I only did one layer. I did drive it around for a couple days (this truck sees dirt roads daily) and didn`t notice a difference. Applying to hot paint probably negated any benefit I would have seen. On my other car (also one layer) I didn`t drive it but experimented with hitting it with compressed air and couldn`t find a difference either. Obviously I could be more scientific about this (good thing I`m not making YouTube videos) but taking the bubba approach to this just wasn`t effective.
 
Unfortunately I am going to have to agree. I do believe it had less static and did not appear to get as dusty/pollen coded as my prior detailers would. However, I have noticed it to leave significant streaking that I have been unable to remove from the car yet. I’ve been super impressed with McKees products and will continue to use them but I think I have to classify this one as a miss. Of note, I applied this to the car in a garage out of direct sunlight however it probably was around 90° in the garage
 
So it`s ... Kenotech Showroom Shine? It seems like the only selling point for this product is anti-static. McKee`s 37 is getting a little carried away with all of these hyperspecific products.
 
Kenotech Showroom Shine is an excellent QD spray and my favorites. It leaves a great shine and it leaves the surface feeling very slick. Anti-static? I`ve seen that too in the product description, but never gave it much credibility or any other similar claim by similar products.

I think no matter what you do, if there is pollen in the air it will land on your car and need to be removed. No way of getting around the fact. Waxes and some sealants might allow the pollen to cling to the surface more than a coating, but that is where I see the biggest difference.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top