MF after waxing?

russde

New member
Now this might not be true...but I read somewhere that using a MF cloth after waxing will remove fresh wax. Any truth to this?

I was about to make a purchase of some quality MF's specifically for after an LSP but now I'm wondering if I should.

Comments?
 
It was a while ago, but I read something similar. It was the product description for TOL's Egyptian Cotton Towels, I believe, that said that the cotton towels should be used to remove wax residue because MF would remove the wax because MF is intended to remove dirt and grease.



I asked about it here and I was reassured that it was not true. Also, I've been using MF to remove sealants without any apparent ill effects. In short, I think the microfibers are fine for removing LSP residues.
 
mjpowers728 said:
It was a while ago, but I read something similar. It was the product description for TOL's Egyptian Cotton Towels,



Yeah, that's where i read it. Didn't know if it was considered kosher to mention another site/vendor or not.

Good to know that it's not accurate, thanks all.

Russ
 
Well, as stated, it will remove wax residue. You know, the haze thing when you apply the wax.



It's because only thin layer of wax will bond to the surface.
 
+1 Only a very small layer bonds. The rest is wiped off. That is why only a small amount is need to wax. I am a guilty overuser.





themightytimmah said:
Nah. Wax bonds to the surface, and only time, abrasives, or solvents will remove it.
 
MDRX8 said:
+1 Only a very small layer bonds. The rest is wiped off. That is why only a small amount is need to wax. I am a guilty overuser.



Same here as far as using a little too much.



I think over time using a cotton or MF will eventually wipe off the protectant as time goes by for the LSP. That's why in here, we pretty much apply at least 1 layer per month.
 
I think MF are more aggressive than cotton. The fibers have hooks. That's why they remove stubborn waxes easier than cotton loops.
 
wannafbody said:
I think MF are more aggressive than cotton. The fibers have hooks. That's why they remove stubborn waxes easier than cotton loops.



I think MF's are more effective than cotton, because there are perhaps 100 times as many or more fibers per square inch. But since each fiber is thinner and softer than a cotton fiber, it makes the MF more gentle than a cotton towel at the same time.
 
The argument I remember was that "suede-style" MF wouldn't remove too much of the LSP as was thus better than "regular" MF, which would supposedly "clean all the wax right off".



I *do* like the suede-style MF for some LSPs (especially light sealants), but I did a good bit of side-by-side testing with various LSP buffing media, and I *NEVER* noticed any differences at all. None.



If you want to try something that might make a *TINY* little difference, try buffing of LSP residue by machine with MF bonnets. It can, IME, sometimes make a miniscule bit of difference due to all the additional burnishing. But again, side-by-side comparisons between suede-style and regular MF bonnets showed no differences at all. The suede-style ones just load up quicker if you put the LSP on thick.
 
Back
Top