Deep Gloss Auto Salon
New member
gmblack3a said:I would highly recommend M105 over PG. Cuts faster and finishes out much better.
+1..
PG needs to be cleaned up... So does M105.. they are compunds after all.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
gmblack3a said:I would highly recommend M105 over PG. Cuts faster and finishes out much better.
Darkstar752 said:I used it with PFW on an 09 Mercedes yesterday. Cut very nicely and finished down very well, but still had to follow it up with Ultrafina.
BTW, it seems to do better on some clears than others.
MotorCity said:What did you use with PFW??
From my experience, UF will not clean up after compounding and/or wool...
SpoiledMan said:No it won't but it will do a damned good job of hiding what it didn't buff out!
SpoiledMan said:No it won't but it will do a damned good job of hiding what it didn't buff out!
toyotaguy said:yeah, but why waste your time overworking or even hitting the panel twice with SIP to remove the defects??? once with M105 which will go a lot faster, then SIP and the finish will look better and correct faster
the thing with "the least abrasive method first" is a generalized statement IMO.
A scratch/swirl is as deep as it is deep...why take 5 min to correct it little by little when there are methods to correct in 1 min??? You have to get to the bottom of it anyway, so you are removing the same amount of clear (if that is your worry), just faster with a more heavy compound...