Bigpoppa3346 said:
How does the lubricity when washing compare between the two?
This was the purpose of the final two videos and it's the basis of the $10 vs. $50 debate, IMO.
Under my scenario (videos), the lubricity was directly comparable.
Bigpoppa3346 said:
Does the thicker foam of the Gilmour make the lubricity between mitt and paint greater when washing?
Not that I can tell. However, you use far more soap with the $10 gun.
I still think the $10 gun would be ideal for somebody wishing to "pre-soak" quarter panels, etc. prior to washing...I'm thinking of very dirty cars during the winter months. This $10 gun certainly is a viable alternative to the $30 unit or Gilmour unit.
For someone that intends to use the foaming strategy at every wash, I think the Gilmour II is the only device I'd recommend. My reason being that you can control the amount of soap used. Again, the small $10 unit goes thru a lot of soap, IMO, and you can't really gage how much soap you have used.
Let's keep in mind that others (Accumulator, for example) have highly-evolved washing techiques that don't resemble my own. I simply apply the soap with the Gilmour and then wash with my mitt. That's it. I'm sure the $10 gun would not work with Accumulator's washing/foaming strategy.
Note: Gilmour II draws the soap from the tank, it doesn't get mixed with the incoming water.
You know exactly how much soap you've consumed when the job is over. Since I'm a semi-control freak, I need to know how much soap I've used.
The $10 unit and the $30 unit both mix incoming water with the soap and the tanks are always full. Problem is, the soap mixture is getting thinner and thinner as you apply.