Accumulator
Well-known member
That "long setup/cure" time for FK1000P probably has something to do with how challenging it can be to layer. People had been told it was OK to layer it right away, or at least after a day or so, but IME doing it that soon often results in those pseudo-holograms.
Bence- What's this #1 New Car Glaze? How might it compare with my old fave from Meguiar's (M05)?
rdroe- So glad I didn't come across badly...I *did* sorta call your baby (or rather, Richard's) ugly with my swipe at that no-buff layering technique
Heh heh, I kinda think the primary end-result of that method is that Griot's sells more wax :chuckle:
The way you tried it with the spray is what I call "pseudo-spitshining" (gee, much use of "psuedo" on this thread, even for me) as it's a bit different from "true" spit-shining, which is a huge PIA compared to what we're doing here.
The pseudo-spitshine is primarily for putting on one coat of wax with improved results; real spitshining is for putting on multiple layers in one session, it's a means of negating the solvent-effect that makes rapid layering of waxes problematic. There's probably some way to combine the two approaches by tweaking something (like the product used for the "spit"), but I've always thought that machine application of LSPs is counterproductive when it comes to layering due to the more aggressive action of the machine (vs. doing it by hand as gently as possible).
I usually do the pseudo-spitshine with SpeedShine, using Meguiar's M16 for the wax, but I've tried it with other QDs and waxes too. If something goes haywire this approach can *really* bite you, leaving a wax residue that's terribly hard to buff off, so be a little careful when doing this kind of thing.
When it goes *right* it not only looks a little better, but also leaves the tiniest, most spherical beads I've ever achieved. I *think* there's a slight trade-off in that the durability seems to suffer just a bit, but it's not a huge diff.
You mentioned the "carnauba Best of Show"- is that the liquid BOS or the one in the dial-up stick? I harldy ever do this sort of stuff with liquids.
Bence- What's this #1 New Car Glaze? How might it compare with my old fave from Meguiar's (M05)?
rdroe- So glad I didn't come across badly...I *did* sorta call your baby (or rather, Richard's) ugly with my swipe at that no-buff layering technique

The way you tried it with the spray is what I call "pseudo-spitshining" (gee, much use of "psuedo" on this thread, even for me) as it's a bit different from "true" spit-shining, which is a huge PIA compared to what we're doing here.
The pseudo-spitshine is primarily for putting on one coat of wax with improved results; real spitshining is for putting on multiple layers in one session, it's a means of negating the solvent-effect that makes rapid layering of waxes problematic. There's probably some way to combine the two approaches by tweaking something (like the product used for the "spit"), but I've always thought that machine application of LSPs is counterproductive when it comes to layering due to the more aggressive action of the machine (vs. doing it by hand as gently as possible).
I usually do the pseudo-spitshine with SpeedShine, using Meguiar's M16 for the wax, but I've tried it with other QDs and waxes too. If something goes haywire this approach can *really* bite you, leaving a wax residue that's terribly hard to buff off, so be a little careful when doing this kind of thing.
When it goes *right* it not only looks a little better, but also leaves the tiniest, most spherical beads I've ever achieved. I *think* there's a slight trade-off in that the durability seems to suffer just a bit, but it's not a huge diff.
You mentioned the "carnauba Best of Show"- is that the liquid BOS or the one in the dial-up stick? I harldy ever do this sort of stuff with liquids.