imported_Bence
New member
Do you remember when we talked about "pass"? As it turned out, it meant different things for different people, but after we cleared that up, we could reach a good consensus. The same happens with "distortion". It is one of the shadiest terms here. When talking about carnauba vs. sealant finishes, some people conclude that a carnauba distorts the overall look, yet the DOI, clarity, reflections, flakiness are top notch.
For me, this word is rather a negative, subtractive one. But I'm yet to see negative aspects of a carnauba finish. It always enhances bare paint. True, its coating is more light absorbent than certain sealants but there are VERY reflective ones as well which are on par with those synthetics. Sealants and carnaubas amplify different attributes of the paint, providing characteristic optical signatures. When you observe bare, unprotected paint (but highly polished), basically all LSPs skew the final appearance, "distorting it" in a certain way. So, what does "distortion" means to you?
For me, this word is rather a negative, subtractive one. But I'm yet to see negative aspects of a carnauba finish. It always enhances bare paint. True, its coating is more light absorbent than certain sealants but there are VERY reflective ones as well which are on par with those synthetics. Sealants and carnaubas amplify different attributes of the paint, providing characteristic optical signatures. When you observe bare, unprotected paint (but highly polished), basically all LSPs skew the final appearance, "distorting it" in a certain way. So, what does "distortion" means to you?