Leading The Way!

Noting that I couldn`t really care less whom Hillary`s campaign hires or what Wasserman Schulz does, nor why anybody else would care either....if that story had unfolded on the Republican side we`d call it "Loyalty".
 
Accumulator said:
Noting that I couldn`t really care less whom Hillary`s campaign hires or what Wasserman Schulz does, nor why anybody else would care either....if that story had unfolded on the Republican side we`d call it "Loyalty".
Click to expand...

Probably right, but in this case she should have just collected a ck from Hillary instead of moving into her "trusted circle". Better eyeball appeal.
 
Yes indeed, the Dems *could* sure improve their eyeball appeal regarding how they handle such stuff, but from, uhm...inside the circle...I guess it doesn`t matter to `em.
 
Accumulator said:
Yes indeed, the Dems *could* sure improve their eyeball appeal regarding how they handle such stuff, but from, uhm...inside the circle...I guess it doesn`t matter to `em.
Click to expand...

Well at least they shut her up. So maybe that will stop global warming........ No if they transfer her outta Florida. :D
 
my favorite part is how abruptly the interview ends when asks if that piece of trash should apologize for calling the benghazi families liars
 
Looks like Trump was leading the way again

WHOA: We just discovered what Muslim father REALLY thinks about U.S. Constitution - Allen B. West - AllenBWest.com

As Breitbart reports,Notwithstanding his war-hero son’s genuinely patriotic example, Khizr M. Khan has published papers supporting the supremacy of Islamic law over “man-made” Western law — including the very Constitution he championed in his Democratic National Convention speech attacking GOP presidential nod Donald Trump.
In 1983, for example, Khan wrote a glowing review of a book compiled from a seminar held in Kuwait called “Human Rights In Islam” in which he singles out for praise the keynote address of fellow Pakistani Allah K. Brohi, a pro-jihad Islamic jurist who was one of the closest advisers to late Pakistani dictator Gen. Zia ul-Haq, the father of the Taliban movement.
Khan speaks admiringly of Brohi’s interpretation of human rights, even though it included the right to kill and mutilate those who violate Islamic laws and even the right of men to “beat” wives who act “unseemly.”
Click to expand...
 
This is why some people have so much anger towards these criminals

GOT HIM.

Former President Bill Clinton collected $5.6 million in fees from GEMS Education, a Dubai-based company that teaches Sharia Law through its network of more than 100 schools in the Middle East, Asia and Africa, according to a Daily Caller News Foundation investigation.
Click to expand...

This type of Trojan horse cannot be shrugged off like no big deal, its the future of our country at stake.
 
JBM said:
Looks like Trump was leading the way again

WHOA: We just discovered what Muslim father REALLY thinks about U.S. Constitution - Allen B. West - AllenBWest.com
Click to expand...

JBM said:
This is why some people have so much anger towards these criminals

GOT HIM.



This type of Trojan horse cannot be shrugged off like no big deal, its the future of our country at stake.
Click to expand...

It doesn`t seem to make a difference.


I`m amazed that people abhor what Trump says, but don`t care a bit at what the Clintons have done.
 
Ronkh said:
It doesn`t seem to make a difference.


I`m amazed that people abhor what Trump says, but don`t care a bit at what the Clintons have done.
Click to expand...

The clintons without a doubt are responsible for killing Americans and are putting people and policy into place that will erode our Constitution, our safety and our way of life. It isnt by accident because they are morons, they are intentionally doing it. Yet we have to ask Ivanka how she feels about her father`s treat ment of women.

Bill Clinton`s history with women

1) Juanita Broaddrick (AR)- rape
2) Eileen Wellstone (Oxford) - rape
3) Elizabeth Ward Gracen - rape - quid pro quo, post incident intimidation
4) Regina Hopper Blakely - "forced himself on her, biting, bruising her"
5) Kathleen Willey (WH) - sexual assault, intimidations, threats
6) Sandra Allen James (DC) - sexual assault
7) Kathy Bradshaw (AK) - sexual assault
8) Cristy Zercher - unwelcomed sexual advance, intimidations
9) Paula Jones (AR) - unwelcomed sexual advance, exposure, bordering on sexual assault, million dollar settlement
10) Carolyn Moffet -unwelcomed sexual advance, exposure, bordering on sexual assault
11) Monica Lewinsky - quid pro quo, post incident character assault
12) Jennifer Flowers - quid pro quo, post incident character assault
13) Dolly Kyle Browning - post incident character assault
14) Sally Perdue - post incident threats
15) Betty Dalton - rebuffed his advances, married to one of his supporters
16) Denise Reeder - apologetic note scanned
Click to expand...
 
Its easy to see why people dont like Trump, but if you love this country you have to vote against Hilary.
 
Huh?

Apparently Mr. West and Mr. Sperry don`t know what a "Book Review" is, and it appears that Mr. Sperry failed to even read the Review in question (or else he`s simply a very stupid person, or else he`s deliberately misspeaking in order to influence his readership..gee, imagine that).

Sheesh, the stuff these "reporters" serve up on a plate and expect people to swallow! They must think their readers are idiots, at the very least they certainly think their readers will just take their word for stuff instead of figuring anything out for themselves. (Trusting somebody else to put something "in context" for ya is a loser`s game; figure it out for yourself.)

OK, I`ll explain it, maybe somebody besides those two [individuals] didn`t have to do a Book Review in school- It`s a review of the Book and how well it was crafted by the Author. It`s not a judgment of the author`s position on any issue, though it should certainly include judgments on the soundness and validity of arguments used to support such a position and how well those are presented. E.g., despite being a vehement anti-Marxist, if I were to review ol` Karl`s Das Kapital, it`d be a "glowing review" because it`s a very well-written book. (There`s even a *LOT* of wisdom to be gleaned from it, and anybody who says differently simply hasn`t read it.) My anti-Marxist political views wouldn`t factor in to a review of Das Kapital as they`re not relevant to a Review of the Book, simple as that.
 
Ronkh said:
It doesn`t seem to make a difference.


I`m amazed that people abhor what Trump says, but don`t care a bit at what the Clintons have done.
Click to expand...
this. he`s an idiot with a mouth that won`t stop, but the Clinton`s have actively participated in events that have ended lives, ruined lives, and negatively impacted the country as a whole. I`m about a 3rd of the way through the book Clinton Cash.....it is staggering how corrupt these 2 are
 
Do you think George Bush would have written a glowing review of the book?

Accumulator said:
Huh?

Apparently Mr. West and Mr. Sperry don`t know what a "Book Review" is, and it appears that Mr. Sperry failed to even read the Review in question (or else he`s simply a very stupid person, or else he`s deliberately misspeaking in order to influence his readership..gee, imagine that).

Sheesh, the stuff these "reporters" serve up on a plate and expect people to swallow! They must think their readers are idiots, at the very least they certainly think their readers will just take their word for stuff instead of figuring anything out for themselves. (Trusting somebody else to put something "in context" for ya is a loser`s game; figure it out for yourself.)

OK, I`ll explain it, maybe somebody besides those two [individuals] didn`t have to do a Book Review in school- It`s a review of the Book and how well it was crafted by the Author. It`s not a judgment of the author`s position on any issue, though it should certainly include judgments on the soundness and validity of arguments used to support such a position and how well those are presented. E.g., despite being a vehement anti-Marxist, if I were to review ol` Karl`s Das Kapital, it`d be a "glowing review" because it`s a very well-written book. (There`s even a *LOT* of wisdom to be gleaned from it, and anybody who says differently simply hasn`t read it.) My anti-Marxist political views wouldn`t factor in to a review of Das Kapital as they`re not relevant to a Review of the Book, simple as that.
Click to expand...
 
ac3a707fb577205a38bb75415f754ca7.jpg
 
JBM said:
Do you think George Bush would have written a glowing review of the book?
Click to expand...
If you mean Bush43, I still question whether he has the intellect to understand grown-up books. With any luck Laura could explain things to him.

I mean, there are just *so* many great books written in support of positions with which I disagree...my reviews would be glowing. The fact that I benefited from reading every one of `em, the fact that I disagreed with them, neither would ever have been mentioned as it`s not relevant to the Review and shouldn`t be part of it (a teacher would severely penalize such stuff in a student`s Book Review!). But then I know from Reviewing and I wouldn`t try to use a Book Review to influence somebody`s opinion on a topic ;)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top