IS SSR2.5 usually...

[TUD]

thinner in constancy vs. SSR 1 & SSR2?

 

[Neo62381]

other way around... :-D

 

[imported_truzoom]

I found it more gloopy than SSR1. Never used SSR2 so can't comment.



SSR2.5 has a noticable gritty texture to it, while SSR1 reminds me of public bathroom soap.

 

[a.k.a. Patrick]

I find the actual consistency about the same, texture is a little more gritty though.....1 & 2 are a little creamier though....

 

[EBPcivicsi]

Wow, my SSR1 is like water, the 2 is like a "regular" polish (like hand lotion), and 2.5 is so thick that I have "slam" the end of the bottle against my hand when the it becomes half full.

 

[TUD]

The reason I asked, I got my SSRs yesterday. 1 & 2 are much thicker (even after vigorous shaking) then the 2.5 which is definately thinner.

 

[EBPcivicsi]

The reason I asked, I got my SSRs yesterday. 1 & 2 are much thicker (even after vigorous shaking) then the 2.5 which is definately thinner.

That sounds totally wrong to me, but my polishes are about 1 year old--perhaps there have been changes to the formulas???



I would contact Steve via detailcity(don't say anything ant-vendor over there) and see what he says. Either way Steve will know and will take care of it.

 

[TUD]

That sounds totally wrong to me, but my polishes are about 1 year old--perhaps there have been changes to the formulas???



I would contact Steve via detailcity(don't say anything ant-vendor over there) and see what he says. Either way Steve will know and will take care of it.

Gottca :2thumbs:

 

[TUD]

Steve's reply, "No SSR2.5 should be thicker than 1 & 2 by a lot." :bolt

 

[EBPcivicsi]

Steve's reply, "No SSR2.5 should be thicker than 1 & 2 by a lot." :bolt

That is inline with my experience as well.