IPA wipedown question

PiPUK said:
I am sorry to bang on about this but nothing you have posted helps. I googles the repost you referred to and there was no mention of IPA in the post itself, only in some follow up comments and none of those responses gave fact about the danger of IPA. Your paint swelling article has nothing and you have so far declined to respond with specific sources for the claims you post.



I am happy to read something factual but all that seems to be happening is one post refers to another which then refers back to the first and there is nothing solid as to the source of the info.



Another interesting and informative counter argument to a hypothesis; you are becoming a valuable asset to this forum
 
TOGWT said:
Another interesting and informative counter argument to a hypothesis; you are becoming a valuable asset to this forum



In reality he asked a question and you didn't answer it .. in your referenced post Isopropyl alcohol is a fast evaporating solvent and at higher ambient temperatures will filly evaporate (flash) within ~30minutes at higher temperatures. At greater dilution percentages it will evaporate more slowly, bear this in mind in warmer environments. I'd like to see where this 30 minute flash time came from. Any time I have ever used IPA be it diluted or straight on any hard surface it flashes near immediately and even diluted to 50/50 its the same when wiped on thin. For it to cause swelling , if it does on anything more than fresh paint, it would have to dwell for a lot longer than the few seconds. The higher the dilution with water the longer the flash time and that's because of the added evaporation of the water not the flashing of the IPA.



Someone who is an asset is one who asks a question that generates an informative and accurate answer.



JMTC
 
what is the correct mixture ?

14.gif
 
hgdcdjian said:
what is the correct mixture ?

14.gif

For what purpose? If/when (and that's not often) I use it to remove polishing oils or "dead" rubber, I just use it undiluted. No, it doesn't flash off too fast for me that way.
 
TOGWT said:
Another interesting and informative counter argument to a hypothesis; you are becoming a valuable asset to this forum



You are not presenting these things as hypothesis - you are presenting them as fact. There is no need to take it to a personal level.
 
PiPUK said:
You are not presenting these things as hypothesis - you are presenting them as fact. There is no need to take it to a personal level.







A fact is irrefutable, a hypothasis is open to discussion; perhaps a definition will help -



Hypotheses
[: a proposition, or set of propositions, set forth as an explanation for the occurrence of some specified group of phenomena, either asserted merely as a provisional conjecture to guide investigation or accepted as highly probable in the light of established facts]



Fact [: any observation that has been repeatedly confirmed and accepted as true; any scientific observation that has not been refuted]



If I hurt your feelings I apologise, but then sarcasm by its very nature is personal
 
TOGWT said:






A fact is irrefutable, a hypothasis is open to discussion; perhaps a definition will help -



Hypotheses
[: a proposition, or set of propositions, set forth as an explanation for the occurrence of some specified group of phenomena, either asserted merely as a provisional conjecture to guide investigation or accepted as highly probable in the light of established facts]



Fact [: any observation that has been repeatedly confirmed and accepted as true; any scientific observation that has not been refuted]



If I hurt your feelings I apologise, but then sarcasm by its very nature is personal



You present information in an encyclopaedic manner. You create a sage like image for yourself. Then when questioned on the information (sorry, hypothesis) you have presented, you generally fail to discuss the matter and, when you do, you provide cyclic arguments which often fail to answer the question. Now, you have turned to sarcasm and word play to further detract.
 
PRICE??? I have also had some not so great results once with it, where OC was smearing, could not wipe off. Switched to IPA and all was good.





kajunman said:
Why not just use CarPro Eraser and be done with it?



kajunman
 
Back
Top