Interview with Klasse USA

I just used the Klasse twins on a new Lexus RX400h, and I found it wasn't that difficult.



The key is to use a QD and lightly mist the surface of the SG after it has dried and then buff out that way, makes it at least twice as easy to remove.
 
autobahn said:
I just used the Klasse twins on a new Lexus RX400h, and I found it wasn't that difficult.



The key is to use a QD and lightly mist the surface of the SG after it has dried and then buff out that way, makes it at least twice as easy to remove.



Thats why I abandoned it! I dont want to have to "add" to remove!
 
a.k.a. Patrick said:
Thats why I abandoned it! I dont want to have to "add" to remove!



Thats why I swithched to wolfgang sealant!! MUCH easier yo remove and it looks better!!
 
Wolfgang is easy on/Off but I dont think I would compare its longevity/protection with that of Klasse.



How they even call Wolfgang a Sealant is beyond my comprehension, dont get me wrong I have it, it has a purpose. But its not going to be around after a few washes, Klasse will take you through the winter.



UPP is the same way, in fact I think even easier on and off, but still its no Klasse.



Even my new favorite Workstatt is no match for the longevity of Klasse.



odd since Klasse is what, 30 years old?
 
FalconGuy said:
Even my new favorite Workstatt is no match for the longevity of Klasse.



:nixweiss I have customers cars that were beading, had slickness and looked great several months after Prime and a single application of AJ. Seems very similar to me to SG but with better appearance.
 
I love Klasse but find it curious that some members report problems, some no problems (me), some report dissatisfaction with longevity, some are very satisfied (me-the longest lasting product I have ever used), some don't care for the results, some are very satisfied (me again); if nothing else the twins are very interesting products.



Have we ever done a survey on problems encountered, shine and longevity?
 
a.k.a. Patrick said:
Its just an annoyance I dont care for. Some annoyances are worth it, but I can get the same results with other products, so why bother?



Same here. I find Acrylic Jett easier to use and I like the look a lot more. The product that gives me the results I want with the least amount of effort is the one I am going to use.



However, I never found SG particularly hard to use when applied very thinly. AJ is even easier though.
 
Sorry if this has already been covered, but is it true that the forumulations for either AIO or SG or both were altered a few years back to comply with VOC regs, making them less durable? Or is that some myth that was concocted by competitors?



Also, how does the AJ Trigger's durability compare with SG?
 
autobahn said:
I guess I don't find spritzing a little bit of QD to remove an LSP is really that big of a deal...



If you are really durability-anal, you should keep in mind that the moisture can *somewhat* compromise an aminofunctional synthetic. And a QD is 97% water.



So: thin application - less wasted product, easy removal, no moisture.
 
Q. Should you wait between applying multiple coats of HGSG?

A. The first coat of HGSG can be applied immediately over a base coat of All-In-One. After that, it's best to wait 8 to 12 hours between coats of HGSG. We have customers with show cars (not daily drivers) that will wipe on a coat of HGSG one day, buff it off the next day and immediately apply another coat. They'll do this every day for a month, literally putting on 30 coats of HGSG over a 30 day period. This sounds crazy but I've seen some of these cars and they're absolutely breathtaking!



And it's Classuh
 
Back
Top