GregCavi
Pinnacle Detailing Owner
They must because I was gauged from the opposite direction 65/55. Just a warning though.
Greg
Greg
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't know if there is an answer to that question. I can see why your stepbrother would say Honda, the reason being that there are so many on the roads these days and it seems to be the choice of cars for a lot of the teens. If I had to take a guess I would say Oldsmobile Cutless if I'm around town on the county roads and probably more SUV's on the interstate. I guess it really would depend on the type of area the radar is being operated in. I don't see many BMW's around the low income areas. I don't think it's like it was in the old days where the police stop all red sport cars lol.Which vehicle make do you stop more often.
GearHead_1 said:Cops too often get a bad rap. With the exception of 1, I deserved any ticket I ever received. I once had the rare opportunity of a cop letting me off when radared at 105 m.p.h. He told me I was an idiot and I told him he was right. He ended up writing me a warning. Truth is stranger than fiction. I was all alone on a two lane highway early one Sunday morning. There wasn't a soul on the road but he was off to the side of it.I was dressed and on my way to church. He said it looked like I was in a hurry to get there.
BenjiBoy650 said:My question to you is, how slow would I have to be going to get stopped for impeding traffic flow? Of course I realize that this depends on many factors - weather and road condition, traffic density, how wide the road is, etc. Reason I ask is because I've been getting down to 50-55MPH cruise on a 6 lane super highway (65MPH limit, 70-80+ flow) and while I don't notice me putting anybody else in danger, I could see how I could get stopped for that. For the most part everybody gets around me without causing anybody else any grief.
hwypatrolman said:As far as being let off for 105 mph. It would be hard to explain in court if someone came to court and had issued a subpoena for that officers records for that particular day and he had issued a ticket to someone going - say 90 mph. My question to the officer would be, why did you write ME for 90 mph in a 70, but you let someone else go that was traveling 105 mph? Did you write me the ticket because you didn't like my car? You got something against me personally? etc... What would the officers response be while testifying in court? How could you explain writing someone else a ticket that was doing something less serious than the last guy you wrote a warning to? A lot of officer discretion has been thrown out the window these days, unfortunatley.