Quenga said:
Per Garry's site it says 1 oz of concentrate for 4 gallons of rinseless:
$159.99 (gal of IUDJ) = $1.24 per oz. 1oz = 4 gallons of wash water, or $.31/gallon of wash water. Where'd you get $0.25?
As Garry noted, the pricing has changed slightly since the time of that posting.
IUDJ isn't a strong cleaner, so it's not going to replace APC's or Degreasers, and ONR works perfectly as a light cleaner with a microfiber towel.
So on one hand, you complain that IUDJ isn't a
strong cleaner, but then you say ONR works perfectly as a
light cleaner. Am I missing something here? Why the double standard?
No one ever claimed IUDJ to be a replacement for an APC/Degreaser when heavy cleaning is necessary. It is, however, at least as effective as ONR as a light cleaner. I would actually say it's closer in performance to Opti-Clean than ONR in my experience.
For routine maintenance on a vehicle that is well kept, there should be little frequent need for an APC-strength product on most components.
I haven't seen what IUDJ looks like as a dressing, but I can't imagine it being better than something like Hyper Dressing, which is significantly cheaper. I'm not trying to come off as a hater, but I always see the same handful of people promoting this product, with unrealistic claims.
In terms of "looks," no question Hyper Dressing is able to fit a wide variety of tastes from "ghetto bling" to "satin." For a professional detailer who needs to be able to cater to these different requirements having a separate product is always going to be a good idea.
ONR is king and changed the way I detail cars. It actually made detailing profitable for me when doing express jobs. I only use 3 products when doing anything but high-end details (where they pay for the extra products). ONR for washing/light cleaning of anything, OPC of heavy cleaning of anything, HyperDressing for interior, exterior, tires, engines. I see no point in trying anything else and I'm still on v2!!
If your current system is working for you, that's great... nothing wrong with that at all. Garry's is a slightly different system that takes a somewhat different approach for those who may be looking for alternatives.
Garry Dean said:
What are these unrealistic claims you speak of?
If onr is working for you, there is no reason to change your routine.
I'm curious to hear the same... I know I've never made any "unrealistic claims" about IUDJ, at least that I'm aware of.
I can tell you that those same guys who you may see telling everyone about their experience tell everyone about all of their experiences. That is what they do. They share info.
:werd: While I have been given products for free to test on a handful of occasions, I have never once been paid to sponsor or advocate a product. And in the case of IUDJ in particular, I have bought all of it myself out-of-pocket from day one.
Accumulator said:
Noting that I'm not a big fan of *any* rinseless/waterless/etc. wash.. in other words, I don't have a dog in this fight (but, well, see below)...when
C. Charles Hahn talks, I listen. We don't always agree, but he has complete credibility in my book. And I'm not the most credulous guy on this forum
Thank you for the compliment, George! Likewise, yours are always opinions I value.
I, OTOH, *do* have a reason to consider other such products. Again, I rarely use this kind of product, but when I do I want the best. And my ONR (v2.0) compromises Collinite brand wax, which I just happen to use/like on a vehicle that sometimes needs this approach. While I could just buy the latest version of ONR, I'm interested in hearing about stuff like IUDJ, in part because of the way it might save a step when doing between-conventional-wash wheel/tire cleanups.
Hope I'm not coming across too :argue Last thing I want to do is make this thread more contentious.
You're not coming across as contentious at all; you're simply presenting the facts based on your own observations about a product and how it fits into your personal routine, which is really all that any of us can do.