EX-P vs. UPP (looks-wise)

maecrispy

maecrispy

Obsessed... who me?
Now that the new EX-P is supposed to be wetter and deeper looking (while keeping it's ultra clear look, I'm assuming), has anyone had a chance to compare it with UPP?



I originally stopped using the old EX-P on my daily driver because it always looked a bit thin (albeit very clear) to me. Kept using it on cutsomers cars though because of it's excellent durability.



Any comments would be appreciated...
 
I've never used the old EX-P but I have tried the new EX-P+ and UPP.

I would say that UPP is deeper and wetter, and more durable too. EX-P looks very neutral, almost like it does nothing, which isn't a bad thing. It also lacks depth imo. I don't know about the old EX-P but the new EX-P+ isn't great on depth to me. Wetness is decent and durability is good.
 
The new EX-P is a bit wetter and slicker but it lacks the glow that UPP produces. IMO, UPP's competitor will be the new EX which has a carnauba appearance like UPP and now with the new durability antidote, it should last with it as well.
 
Excellent. You hit it right on the head Sean... durability is the main reason I haven't made EX a staple in my stash of sealants. I know Scott has had decent durability with EX but his area seems to be wax/sealant friendly. MI is not for sure.



I take it the nex EX is out already so any order I place will get me the new EX?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top