imported_Intermezzo
New member
<blockquote class='ipsBlockquote' >
<em class='bbc'>Originally posted by seturner [/i]
<strong class='bbc'>Puterbum is right, guys. The chemists and auto experts at Autoint do not know as much as us on this board. They should know that dawn rules. Brad has obviously been brainwashed and did not see the positive comparitive results he said he saw.
By the way, Dawn did squat for removing my old "wax" or whatever was on my car when I got it. [/b]</blockquote>
Seturner, speaking of chemists and auto experts, virtually ALL the OEM (chrysler, ford, gm, etc.) use clay and have approved it as the safest method for removing rail dust. (quoted from DK's post) Remember, only clay will pull embedded contaminants out of the paint. An product such as ABC will mainly just get the surface contaminants, just like JNRBRDMAN reported. It doesn't "completely prep the surface".
Another ABC Post
<em class='bbc'>Originally posted by seturner [/i]
<strong class='bbc'>Puterbum is right, guys. The chemists and auto experts at Autoint do not know as much as us on this board. They should know that dawn rules. Brad has obviously been brainwashed and did not see the positive comparitive results he said he saw.
By the way, Dawn did squat for removing my old "wax" or whatever was on my car when I got it. [/b]</blockquote>
Seturner, speaking of chemists and auto experts, virtually ALL the OEM (chrysler, ford, gm, etc.) use clay and have approved it as the safest method for removing rail dust. (quoted from DK's post) Remember, only clay will pull embedded contaminants out of the paint. An product such as ABC will mainly just get the surface contaminants, just like JNRBRDMAN reported. It doesn't "completely prep the surface".
Another ABC Post