Confused about Meg's SFP vs. #9 2.0

I

imported_Aaron in Denver

New member
Both of these are listed as a "3" on Meg's aggressiveness scale, but my assumption is that they are not the same.

Does anyone know the difference and what would be a better use for one or the other?

I'm trying to get off some very fine scratches on my black Boxster. They look like they are just from washing, etc.



Thanks for any help!
 
It is my understanding that SPF is slightly more aggressive than #9 and to me, it seems to have more oils and leaves a slightly wetter look. Either one is an outstanding product.
 
It is funny you mention that because I had looked at that a while back, they have both products listed at #3 and nothing at #2 rating:nixweiss

Well I did not find anything:nixweiss
 
I don't believe there is a discernable difference in the scratch-removing ability of the two. If anybody should know, it would be Meguiar's, and the equal rating is accurate, as far as I've seen. FWIW, I believe #82 was developed after #9, so perhaps Megs added something to the mix that wasn't included with #9. Maybe Mike P will chime in here, if we're lucky.

Jeff Laughhunn
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top