FJF said:
As I've already said more than once, the products were not on the paint at the same time. They were listed as examples of LSPs used over the last 3 years. Can you tell me again how I'm the one who fails to grasp a concept, when proof of unyielding cranial density is quoted right above?
You say that they weren’t all used at the same time, but yet in your first statement you said, "
I'm expecting 915 to arrive later this week. It'll be used to top multiple layers of 105, and perhaps get topped by layers of itself and 476. The car lives outside and it hasn't been able to retain any LSP for more than a month. This includes multiple layers of 1000P, 845, 476, JW AJ, etc. FWIW, last application of 845 barely lasted 3 weeks." Now speaking different languages may cause me to misinterpret things from time to time, but to me that statement sounds like you intend on layering several different LSP’s now, which tells me you’ve probably done it before, too. If you’ve used multiple layers of Colly, FK, etc. and that didn’t work, what makes you think this cocktail of waxes will work? As for the “3 year” time frame, no I didn’t read that because it wasn’t directed to me; I try mind my own conversations, unlike you. The next time you feel the need to comment on something that doesn’t pertain to you in order to prove someone wrong, you should probably explain yourself a bit better the first time around to avoid pissing contests.
FJF said:
I didn't realize that you were doing me a favor by completely ignoring the facts. Clearly, you have absolutely no idea as to the scope of the situation and cannot grasp the constants at hand, as has been shown over and over. Yet, you keep coming back with another dubious notion seemingly geared to boost whatever preconceived idea lies behind the condescending rhetoric. Now you're upset, because your (supposed) advice isn't well-regraded. Sorry.
The facts (according to the information you’ve given): You plan on adding layer(s) of Colly 915 and 476 on top of “multiple layers of 105”. Now, I’m just going to assume that you’re referring to Meguiar’s 105 here. That’s a compound, not a wax, not a sealant and most certainly not a foundation for any wax. Multiple layers of it?? Have you polished your car with 105 so many times?? Well there may be a problem… you may have polished away the clear coat if you’ve done it “multiple” times. Fact: You intend on applying a less durable wax, Colly 915, than the ones you’ve used before (476, FK) in hopes to increase durability...?? 915 has a higher carnauba content than the others, which makes it look slightly wetter but because of that, durability is sacrificed. Have you tried Colly 885 yet? It’s the marine, aeronautical wax so it’s sure to give you better durability than the others.
FJF said:
<sigh> This isn't my only car. As I've said before (is there an echo in here), my other cars don't react to LSPs like this one. It's very frustrating. I've tried almost everything imaginable with equally dismal results. I'm going to say this again so there's no misunderstand. Please read this carefully. All of my cars, except for one, respond well to LSPs. However, one car in particular doesn't. Just because you waxed your car and a LSP worked out well, doesn't mean that it will on my Mazda, the car in question. I really don't know why that's so difficult to grasp.
I’ve worked on hundreds of Mazdas and other cars very similar to yours and I’ve never had the issues you’re having. In fact, I have a Mazda 5 (2007, silver) that I’ve been maintaining for more than one year now and it wore Dodo Supernatural all winter without any issues. I can’t imagine that the paint on your car and my customer’s car is any different.
FJF said:
Errr...I most certainly do know more about the paintwork on this car that you. I've worked on it for 3 years; you've never even seen it.
Like I said above, I can’t imagine that yours is so much different than the others I’ve done.
FJF said:
Please recall that I never asked for advice, but I did point out that your claims weren't universally applicable and cited one of my cars as an example. This seemed to have unnerved you and here were are.
Please note that I never asked for your opinion about my advice to someone else. By interjecting and by trying to prove me wrong, you opened yourself to my comments, no?
FJF said:
I like to think that I can afford to spend $11, but I appreciate your concern for my financial health. As we've already determined, you know zero about this situation. Even when told directly about it, you completely ignore the written word. Comically, you complain about being insulted, while uploading comments like the above. With all this in mind, can you briefly explain why anyone with an IQ in the tipple digits shouldn't see your so-called advice as an exercise in absurdity?
Well I’m just tickled pink that you can afford another $11 for a can of wax… go for it. Baahhha. Actually it is
you sir who knows zero about this situation because if you haven’t figured it out after 3 years… now that’s absurd. I don’t think I’m the one with the “unyielding cranial density” problem. I’ll wish you luck on this one because your skills, “legwork” and aptitude are clearly of no service to you in this adventure.