CG EZ Glaze v. DWG

Alfisti said:
I have good reason to say what I'm saying, but I'm not going into it any further.



My statement stands. You can believe it or ignore it - I don't really care. :p
Click to expand...





Okay. Can you please elaborate on your reasons? I'd like to know why you think that. I respect your opinion, I'd just like to know what it is and why.
 
Alfisti said:
I have good reason to say what I'm saying, but I'm not going into it any further.



My statement stands. You can believe it or ignore it - I don't really care. :p
Click to expand...



Okay, so what's the game, because this sounds like trouble making B.S. :rolleyes:
 
That's one of the reasons I'm starting to avoid CG stuff. Their descriptions are not always consistent...I use CG EZCreme as if it does have cleaners to err on the side of caution just in case.



Same with the crazy claims on their waterless detail system.
 
Alfisti said:
Don't these two statements contradict each other?
Click to expand...

Yes they do. But they are both on the CG's website.



I am guessing but I would think that DWG is a made just like EZ Glaze with a supra light cleaner.
 
David Fermani said:
Playing devil's advocate just a touch....I guess if you categorize solvents as cleaners, someone could think the surface was being cleaned. Even waxes *can* clean to a certain extent then so. So could water too I guess. (that I why I said intensional cleaners) But, DWG is definately not marketed to do that and is not in the "cleaner" category.
Click to expand...



That:nervous:s a stretch
 
bigfoot said:
How difficult can it be to understand 2 simple statements?!?!?!?!?! EZ Creme HAS cleaners and DWG does NOT contain cleaners!
Click to expand...

Oh it is not hard to read to statements. But it is different to beleive two statements. Hey DWG is a excellant product. I have used it over a LSP before. But I beleive it has a very light cleanseing action that probably does not affect the bonded LSP.
 
Alfisti said:
I have good reason to say what I'm saying, but I'm not going into it any further.



My statement stands. You can believe it or ignore it - I don't really care. :p
Click to expand...



Well, in a court of law your case would be thrown out for lack of evidence and the inability to establish "reasonable doubt."
 
MDRX8 said:
Oh it is not hard to read to statements. But it is different to beleive two statements. Hey DWG is a excellant product. I have used it over a LSP before. But I beleive it has a very light cleanseing action that probably does not affect the bonded LSP.
Click to expand...



I agree that DWG is a great product, but if it had cleaners, don't you think it'll still affect the LSP's performance sooner or later even if the cleaners are considered "mild"?
 
bigfoot said:
I agree that DWG is a great product, but if it had cleaners, don't you think it'll still affect the LSP's performance sooner or later even if the cleaners are considered "mild"?
Click to expand...

Yes and No. I think it would depend on the LSP charecterists. Waxes would be affected more than sealants. JMHO
 
Cleaning Fool said:
Well, in a court of law your case would be thrown out for lack of evidence and the inability to establish "reasonable doubt."
Click to expand...

Just as well we're not in a court of law but a forum of personal experiences and opinions. :cool:



I won't spend any more time on this discussion. We simply have to agree to differ.



On the other important point, has anyone taken advantage of the 1Z clearance? :spot
 
Really........what the hell........?



You come on here and make a strong statement that contradicts everybody else but wont explain yourself? Real big of you





I dont think anyone is here to argue with you, just to hear why you believe what you do.
 
Dsoto87 said:
Really........what the hell........?



You come on here and make a strong statement that contradicts everybody else but wont explain yourself? Real big of you





I dont think anyone is here to argue with you, just to hear why you believe what you do.
Click to expand...



No, but it sure does lend to his credibility...lol.
 
Alfisti mentioned his name was Paul. Maybe he's secretly Paul (the guy who takes a million photos of girls waxing cars) from CG? And maybe he's hinting something to us about a product he produces for Danase? Or maybe I'm just crazy.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top