tom p. said::hairpull![]()
Well you can't say Armor is bad now just because it used to be years ago. It is not the same product anymore and really shouldn't get slammed like it does.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
tom p. said::hairpull![]()
FujiFast said:i haven't bought nonetheless touched anything armor all since 1992
ZaneO said:I believe AA has changed a great deal since then.
truzoom said:I suppose the only problem now is making sure you are buying the reformulated armor all. Any thoughts on their variations like low gloss or extra shine? I think I can buy a 32oz bottle of low gloss armor all for about 3 bucks at walgreens.
accordmaniac said:This is a little bit off topic but since you guys say that white milky colored protectants are water based and usually not harmful but clear protectants are usually harmful. I use Meg's NXT protectant and it's clear. Does that mean its not safe for vinyl?
Scottwax said:I switched back to Armor All a few years back. It works great, has decent durability for a water based dressing, no longer has that greasy, oily look and it available anywhere. I have tried everything under the sun and always end up going back to AA. Why pay more for a boutique product when there is a great OTC product that is $10 a half-gallon at Pep Boys?
My understanding is that other PDMS,water based dressings that cost more ( take 303 for example) contain more and/or "better" resins. What that specifically and scientifcally means
Alfisti said:I always thought it was an acrylic based dressing. When they say 303 "doesn't contain silicone oils", are they talking about dimethyl silicone? :nixweiss