1st off, thanks for taking the time to try the product and post your support on this and all the other threads. It means alot to this forum that you are being as honest as possible in your search for the perfect product.:thumb: And trust me I know how hard that desire is to fill. However, products serve different purposes for different people, for different vehicles and for different expectations. And even though this one might not be exactly what you're looking for for this application, it certainly (as you stated) has great characteristics in its own right. I'll try to answer your orignal statements the best I can....
RZJZA80 said:
I've gone through almost an entire bottle of it, so I think my observations have some merit. First off, it does provide an amazing shine to any paint, and is very easy to use, a little goes a long way, and every other good thing said about it.
Agreed. I'm just about done with my 1st bottle too! I've used it for light to moderate correction, gloss enhancement and as a quick maintenance 1 stepper.
RZJZA80 said:
Now for the uncertain part. I wanted Speed to replace Klasse for me, as they are both called AIO's. However, I've increasingly found that Speed doesn't have the cleaning ability that Klasse does, which was proved once again over this past weekend. A couple oxidized cars, Speed glossed them right up, but didn't get most of the oxidation off. I tried Klasse and it did the trick perfectly, so I'm wondering, is Speed really a true AIO? I know it's a good sealant/polish/very very light cut, but is it a cleaner also? I think it would have to be to be called an "AIO".
Oh boy, it's been years since I've used KAIO so excuse me if I'm rusty. I remember it was all the rage many, many years ago. I just (personally) don't have a need for a
dedicated paint cleaner on today's finishes. I have several approaches to tackling this workflow, and am not all that sure how SPEED would fit the bill in this arena? How ofter are we as detailers running into cars with heavy oxidation? And when doing so, are we reaching for a AIO, or a polishing
compound?
And speaking of the term All In One(AIO), that can mean many things to many people. And I would like to interpret part of HD's vision/description of "SPEED as it being a finishing polish with having the 'ability' to perform moderate correction all while leaving a slick and protected finish behind".
RZJZA80 said:
Now for the bad. Four cars I've been keeping track of have reported back on durability. Two are daily drivers, and two are garage queens. The first daily, with Speed on it for two weeks now, reported back that it doesn't feel slick anymore, but it still has it's shine. Also, the beading when washed isn't as tight as two weeks ago. The second daily reported the same thing, except no beading to report of as it hasn't been washed. The two garage queens reported that the slickness feel is diminished, but not entirely gone, shine is still good, and no beading to report on since no washing has been done. Again, I was really hoping it would compete and replace with Klasse AIO here, and Klasse has lasted a very long time for me.
Oh boy, that wasn't as bad as I thought!

1st off, keep in mind, that the slick feeling really isn't anything that gives truly any benefits other then to pacify the tactile nature of the end user. What you are basically feeling is the oil content residue left behind on the surface. That slick/oily finish is very short lived in all products and some great products don't even have that attribute in their chemistry. I know clients love the feel, but again, I would place my attention to other factors.
You claim the beading on one of the scenarios have me reaching out for more clarification....you stated (in your own words) that "the beading when washed isn't as tight as two weeks ago". And that it's a daily driver and SPEED has been on for 2 weeks. That would mean (now check my math) that this person washed their car almost immediatley after you detailed it? Is there any way that disturbed the cross-linking of the product? And what wash soap are they using? The reason I ask is because soap can play a major role in the beading effect and its longevity. You could have 2 identical cars with the identical protectant applied, but wash with 2 soaps and have 2 separate beading characteristics. (and not to go off on a tangent, but HD is working on their release of a dedicated shampoo designed exclusively for mainting the integrity of their protectant's chemistry - stay tuned).
RZJZA80 said:
My main thing so far is the cleaning ability. In another thread of mine here, someone mentioned that Speed didn't perform well because the car had DG Aquawax on it, applied a month previous to the Speed application. That got me thinking that, if true, Speed is not a true AIO as cleaning is part of an AIO, and if it can't even clean off month old Aquawax, it can't clean much of anything else either. Also, as far as cut goes, the only real cut I'm seeing is when I use Speed with a cutting pad. When I use it with a finishing pad, there is no real cut that I can see.
Again, this goes back to the interpretation of an AIO. And there are many variables that can go into how well a product and/or pad combination can perform on certain paints, with certain products/things remaining on the surface that could play a role in their performance. I've seen SPEED perform incredible results with their Green polishing pad on solid black single stage paint that had some light oxidation/hazing and moderate swirls. Keep in mind that the entire car was also polished in 85 degree full Florida sun. I'm not certain how many other products (and even AIOs) would do in that category?