You bet, voting with our wallets is certainly a way to make our feelings known, and then sometimes it just serves to make us feel better. Government regulation rarely is effective and is most often a detriment to most processes. Throwing money at a problem is rarely the answer. True again, on conservation. Reduce demand, thus increasing supply should result in lower prices at the pump. We can only hope that prices decline as swiftly as they rose.
The pressure is often on publicly traded executives to get a ROI and post solid returns to stock holders all the while maintaining prices that consumers will tolerate. I primarily have issues with industries (most often in the manufacturing sector) which do not reinvest profits to maintain a solid infrastructure and end up losing ground to companies outside of the U.S.
To my knowledge, Bush has done nothing to hold the line on spending in any area. The Legislature gave him his budget and he has not said no to their spending as usual. I still laugh at the Republicans characterization of the Democrats as “tax and spend”. They seem to have developed a black belt in spending themselves.
Scrub, I thank you for the conversation, Dwayne and admins/moderators, I thank you for allowing this type of exchange to take place. I am a bit disappointed that with the freedom we were given here that we didn’t hear from more users.