1Z Glanz Wax 'New Formula'
- Thread starter JaCkaL829
- Start date
Junebug
JAFO
Hey Scott, a lot of my customers like the "too bright" look - maybe it's my location LOL!
JuneBug said:
That's strange...I used it on my s/s black RAV4 recently and found it far less bright than NXT or #21 which I had on before.
It really darkened the paint, made it gossy, but looked 'warm' and less 'bright' than any LSP I had used on it before. That's weird. :nixweiss
imported_Grouse
New member
Looks are very very subjective. That is why i did not add a looks category in my sealant comparison.
Junebug
JAFO
"Looks are very very subjective" Amen bro - should have seen my first wife...what was I smokin?........nevermind.
a.k.a. Patrick
New member
Scottwax said:I've used the original version and it is pretty damn good stuff.
I really liked the original also Scott. I found the newer version a little warmer, but durability has been setback slightly.
As for 2 months durability, I find that abut average for most sealants anyway.
Yes, its the old formula...but I would've thought the non-carnauba GW would be brighter not warmer. :nixweiss
Yes, its true, looks are subjective...up to a point, IMO. What I mean is, that it's subjective when two guys look at a group of babes and decide which is the best-looker. What's not subjective is picking the only blonde in the group. That's an optical fact.
In a *similar* (but more difficult) way *I* don't believe deciding whether a LSP is brighter than another is subjective, as though it's a matter of taste. I believe it's an optical fact. It's just more difficult to pick it up and that requires some experience and training of the eye. In fact, you can buy "gloss metres" (very expensive) that measure the optical brightness/gloss of a wax and outputs a number.
For example, if I say Souveran is brighter and not as warm as IW, that's not subjectivity, that's inexperience.
If I say I like the look of IW over souveran, that's subjectivity, and more power to you. :up
I'm not sure if I'm explaining myself well enough.
Yes, its true, looks are subjective...up to a point, IMO. What I mean is, that it's subjective when two guys look at a group of babes and decide which is the best-looker. What's not subjective is picking the only blonde in the group. That's an optical fact.
In a *similar* (but more difficult) way *I* don't believe deciding whether a LSP is brighter than another is subjective, as though it's a matter of taste. I believe it's an optical fact. It's just more difficult to pick it up and that requires some experience and training of the eye. In fact, you can buy "gloss metres" (very expensive) that measure the optical brightness/gloss of a wax and outputs a number.
For example, if I say Souveran is brighter and not as warm as IW, that's not subjectivity, that's inexperience.
If I say I like the look of IW over souveran, that's subjectivity, and more power to you. :up
I'm not sure if I'm explaining myself well enough.