Pan The organizer fee leak lawyers involved LMAO

BudgetPlan1 said:
The timing is great, some wanker gonna latch onto this and release a vid mentioning this as "IRREFUTABLE PROOF THAT PAN MAKES $$$$ FROM YOUTUBE!!! YOU VIEWERS BOUGHT PAN THIS CAR!!!!"

He did seem more orgasmic the first time he `met` Beadmaker in the Rag Company video though

Good for him regardless, color me (Aventurine) green with envy
Click to expand...


Well, if they aren`t posting it, I`m sure many are thinking it.

I didn`t yet watch the whole video, but why the tears?

Another question - if that`s your only ride and you are not a real speed aficionado, where would he drive that rocketship?
 
bob m said:
Well, if they aren`t posting it, I`m sure many are thinking it.

I didn`t yet watch the whole video, but why the tears?

Another question - if that`s your only ride and you are not a real speed aficionado, where would he drive that rocketship?
Click to expand...

Only watched a bit to see what car it was, figured maybe a GT4 but he certainly went all in with the Turbo...as soon as he started blubbering, i was out.

I`d guess 90% of `super cars` never get near their capabilities, just `cruisin & stylin` to the country club.
 
Well, here in the US, on most roads the legal fun is in the first 2 gears. I think stock my car topped out 3rd gear around 75 mph. On the autobahn, it`s a different story.

Even at a racetrack, unless a pro driver, the guys never get to push the car at full throttle for very long. I`ve been in situations where guys with 3x the hp can`t pass without me having to lift off the gas. A lot of those guys have too much car and not enough experience.
 
Pats300zx said:
Things must be good in the review business. It looks like he might have to increase his fees.

Click to expand...

My first (and last) Pam the Organizer video. Could only make it to the reveal (8:05).
I can`t get past this Jabroni`s haircut. He needs to return to Super Cuts and demand his $8 back. The hair on my genitals have more style then this.

Having said that he has great taste in cars. That is one beautiful ride!!
 
bad penny said:
My first (and last) Pam the Organizer video. Could only make it to the reveal (8:05).
I can`t get past this Jabroni`s haircut. He needs to return to Super Cuts and demand his $8 back. The hair on my genitals have more style then this.
Click to expand...

That`s really nice of you to let us all know that, but please don`t feel the need to share any such pictures. :yikes:
 
wannafbody said:
. I`ve been in situations where guys with 3x the hp can`t pass without me having to lift off the gas. A lot of those guys have too much car and not enough experience.
Click to expand...

oh man. I wish I had 3x more power! (Currently at about 110) - In my prior car, with about 185 at the crank, I gave it all I could, and "cruised" the straight at about 120 mph. Speed governor kicked in. Sucked to not have the added speed needed. Made that part of the track rather boring. Kind of. Something about pushing a 1991 Honda CRX to that speed that can make a guy nervous.
 
JustJesus said:
oh man. I wish I had 3x more power! (Currently at about 110) - In my prior car, with about 185 at the crank, I gave it all I could, and "cruised" the straight at about 120 mph. Speed governor kicked in. Sucked to not have the added speed needed. Made that part of the track rather boring. Kind of. Something about pushing a 1991 Honda CRX to that speed that can make a guy nervous.
Click to expand...

I have a Miata track car. I was talking to a guy with a 15 Mustang 5.0 that got passed in advanced group by a guy in a Miata. The guy was in shock until he found out the driver was Tommy Byrne.
 
Came across this on the GlassParency YouTube page

8a1f3cfdbbfb25464a2c9220adef2e50.jpg
 
Rather than posting about ad revenue hungry bloggers, simply post review of the product, then add a poll with 10 options from 1-10 (10 being the best) and let people vote on how effective they think the product is. Nothing better than democracy for product results.
 
My opinion of detailing product and equipment manufacturers who give such things to fellow Autopians for FREE to post their personal experiences and and hopefully, unbiased opinions about them are far more "interesting and trusted", in my humble opinion. I have no problem for those of you who volunteer to do so and are willing to take the time to post pics and type out your story in this forum for all Autopians to read, in exchange that you keep the product or piece of equipment for doing , OR have purchased such things at a reduced price in exchange for your reviews. I find it a win-win-win situation for all parties involved:
1) For the manufacturer it`s cheap advertising and publicity by a real-world detailing user
2) For the reviewer because that person gets to try out a detailing product or piece of equipment and keep it OR buy it at a reduced price.
3) For the fellow Autopian and myself, we (I) get to read about it and make an informed decision on the product or equipment as well as read additional comments and questions from other Autopians within the discussion.

I also think that there are some of you who are beta-testers who are trying out new products and/or equipment for these detailing manufacturers, but because of sworn secrecy to legally fulfill confidentiality agreements, cannot say ANYTHING about them nor its development. Those who do so are an important part of this development process for both manufacturer and the end detailing consumer , we Autopians, to whom this product or piece of equipment will hopefully be marketed. Again, we (I) am indebted to those of you who do, and yes, Captain Obvious does ask questions that cannot be answered about them when small snippets are "leaked" or "inadvertently" made while posting some of your detailing exploits (like Sizzle Chest, to name one. Sorry to single you out Sizzle and the constant celebrity-gossip-column-like reporter questions from THE Captain Obvious you put up with. Hey, inquiring (and annoyingly nosy) minds want to know... just sayin`!! Wait for it, wait for it....)
 
bad penny said:
I couldn`t take but 45 seconds of this. What a phony. Anyone who listens to this guy deserves to get their pocket picked
Click to expand...

Scott can be a bit much, and he does push his product line sometimes. But he also still makes and has a lot of older videos where he shows dirt cheap alternatives to products to save you money. That said I really don`t watch his videos any more, but to be fair I don`t watch detailing videos on YT anymore really unless it`s Brian from Apex.

atbalfour said:
He definitely is a stand up guy, super helpful and always well intentioned. He can`t be tarred with the same brush as Pan so if that`s what`s happened that`s extremely poor. I can`t recall the specific reference to Brian by Scott re. impartiality.

What I can recall is that he`s been called out in that video / comments re. his review of his own hydra sheet product. He`s since deleted that video, come out to say that the application method is a little different and that footage was mixed up. It could be true, but in most cases there`s no smoke without fire and redoing videos is in my view a little suspect!

Brian`s testing while not always perfectly consistent, is at least enough that I find I can draw comparisons from, even though his is the only gloss meter seems fixated with the 101 figure... He`s also reviewed a LOT of products so his channel is an encyclopedia in many ways

Sent from my LYA-L09 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

In Brian`s defense his YT channel is secondary to his actual detailing shop. He said in his response video that the day he was filming the video it was pretty busy so he was having to go back and forth between shooting the video and talking to customers. And that lead to some mix ups on his part, he re did the video when the shop was closed so he could focus on shooting the video. I don`t know if Apex`s channel is monetized, but even if it is his primary source of income is him detailing cars in his shop. So I tend to believe he`s shooting straight if he likes a product. He`s definitely posted poor reviews of products he didn`t like much.


And while I don`t like Pan`s videos, good for him. I try to always be a stand up guy, but if I could make $100k for making 6 or 7 videos speaking highly for a product that I don`t like. I might rethink being a stand up guy lol. In a perfect world I could get 16k a video AND be making them for products I really do use.
 
Oh boy I have been reading some of the comments in Pans videos and ScottHD videos oh they are too good! There are some die hards in each camp. Next t video they release scroll through some of the comments people leave on these videos you’ll laugh your tail off.
 
quebert said:
Scott can be a bit much, and he does push his product line sometimes. But he also still makes and has a lot of older videos where he shows dirt cheap alternatives to products to save you money. That said I really don`t watch his videos any more, but to be fair I don`t watch detailing videos on YT anymore really unless it`s Brian from Apex.



In Brian`s defense his YT channel is secondary to his actual detailing shop. He said in his response video that the day he was filming the video it was pretty busy so he was having to go back and forth between shooting the video and talking to customers. And that lead to some mix ups on his part, he re did the video when the shop was closed so he could focus on shooting the video. I don`t know if Apex`s channel is monetized, but even if it is his primary source of income is him detailing cars in his shop. So I tend to believe he`s shooting straight if he likes a product. He`s definitely posted poor reviews of products he didn`t like much.


And while I don`t like Pan`s videos, good for him. I try to always be a stand up guy, but if I could make $100k for making 6 or 7 videos speaking highly for a product that I don`t like. I might rethink being a stand up guy lol. In a perfect world I could get 16k a video AND be making them for products I really do use.
Click to expand...

My understanding is that Pan doesn`t review products he doesn`t like. You may or may not believe him, but that`s what he has said.
 
bob m said:
My understanding is that Pan doesn`t review products he doesn`t like. You may or may not believe him, but that`s what he has said.
Click to expand...

That`s a possibility, in the geeky tech world there use to be a guy 3dgameman who reviewed computer hardware and he only reviewed products he liked. He kind of had a Pan vibe to him, maybe even Pan used to be a fan and modeled himself after dude. I`d imagine 3dgameman got comped for his reviews. It makes me question both though because that`s human nature I suppose.

And the companies paying him could influence him subconsciously to like the product. Hell if Armor All contacted me tomorrow saying they`d give me $16k to make a 10 minute video about their classic, I might suddenly start to actually like it lol. If nothing else, just getting a product free will tend to make people less critical of it`s flaws. Which is why reviews on Amazon where they got it for free are marked stating it.

I know people like to call Pan a tool, but he`s making $$$$$, and even with this scandal I think he`ll still be okay. I think he`s a tool for trying to claim he created Elixr, but the money company`s pay him to showcase their products, he`s doing something right.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top