Yet Another Z2 Pro Review

tripper_111

New member
Yes, I know this is a bit late. I received my shipment middle of February this year, and yet I still have a half-filled bottle of the old Z2. I planned to use the new version only upon using up the old bottle, but I guess it would take me forever! After reading so many posts about the new Z2, and the newly-released Z8, I guess itâ€â„¢s time to take the plunge on the new products. (And leave the old bottle on the shelfâ€Â¦)



Firstly, I subscribed to the opinion that looks are extremely subjective. As for me, I must admit that I really prefer the depth of carnauba rather than reflections that only synthetic produces.



Very much influential to my initiative in trying the Z2 Pro is the fact that some of Autopian Zaino users, almost swear that the new Z2 is indeed different than the old Z2, more specifically, that the former yields more depth in contrast with pure reflections of the latter.



Because of this, I thought that the Z2 Pro is the answer to my almost never-ending quest in finding the best synthetic wax that yields the most carnauba look! Yes, there are more synthetic waxes that provides extreme depth (almost carnauba â€â€œlike blend), but nevertheless didnâ€â„¢t last atleast 2 mos. in our tropical weather.



Now the process. Lately I have been very much busy with my graduate studies (yes, Iâ€â„¢m on my last year in graduate school), and I decided to have the prep stage done by a reputable local detailing shop owned by a friend of mine. They used Eagle One proline polishes all over the horizontal panesl (doors, fenders, etc.) and some Menzerna power gloss over the roof and the hood (to eliminate annoying water marks). Unfortunately, the process did not eliminate 100% those marks that very much seemed etched on the paint. At any rate, it did improve the appearance to at least 85%. Final product was the K-Twins. (1 coat each).



As soon as I got home (almost sundown), I immediately opened the bottle of the Z2 Pro, do the ZFX mixing (I strictly followed the Autopian way), and put the first coat. The first coat did not impress me very much, maybe because the K-Twins provided a nice base shine. The second and the third, created a very slight improvement, which is almost second to none. The only improvement I noticed was the reflections. I know the K-Twins are extremely shiny (in my experience), but 3 coats of the new Z2 Pro improved the reflections. These improvements were very much apparent as I pulled out the car from the garage and let the sunlight unleashed the true nature of the Z2 Proâ€â„¢s look. (Z6 in between coats) Three coats almost took me three hours (with 30 mins drying time in between).



WET-LOOK. I believed I would do no justice to Zaino if do no mention of the wet-look claim. Yes, same as the old Z2, with slight improvement, wet-look is retained.



SLICKNESS is still a killer.



DURABILITY. Need not emphasize on this.



VALUE FOR MONEY. Well and good. I ordered several bottles to maximize shipping cost.



PROCESS. I still do the ZFX mixing, same as the old Z2. But some members claimed that ZFX may be dispensed with even on the initial coat if you do not plan on doing 3 coats on a single day (i.e. do initial 3 coats in three days)



DEPTH. This is one thing that is very much influential in writing this review. I expected a more carnauba depth on this one, but to me, it still fell short of my preference. I must say that the new Z2 Pro provides more depth than the old Z2 which provides pure reflections. But since I was expecting a near carnauba-depth, with an almost deepening effect on the color of the paint, it did not impress me much.



OVERALL. The new Z2 Pro is still king of the synthetics (flamesuit on). At least just for me, and I havenâ€â„¢t tried WG, Blackfire, EX-P. If any of these 3 products would provide a more carnauba-depth with an almost Zaino-like durability that also retains slickness after every wash, then the above conclusion might be altered. It need not provide 100% carnauba look, but at least an improvement over Z2 Proâ€â„¢s 25% depth. At least at 30% guestimate will do.





AND THE PICTURES. I know the pictures donâ€â„¢t do much justice since it was only taken on my PalmOne Treo 650 smartphone. But nevertheless, all must agree that Zainoâ€â„¢s performance in the looks department withstand the test of 0.3 megapixel smartphone camera. If it can do so as such, what more in person???



The Reflections Shot:

19587cr-v1-med.jpg




Me Taking The Picture:

19587cr-v3-med.jpg




The Wetlook Shot:

19587cr-v4-med.jpg




Reflections in The Sun:

19587cr-v5-med.jpg




My Honda CR-V:

19587cr-v6-med.jpg
 
Looks pretty good from what I can tell with the pic quality.

So far, WG has been the best for me when it comes to sealant slickness with carnauba depth. When I applied P21S over WG, there was more of a wet-look, very slight but almost negligible (might be in my head) increase in depth, but a very noticeable decrease in slickness. Beads a lot better, though.
 
No flame wars here, I just disagree though. I really think Pro and the old z2 are very different. I think Pro mimicks nubas pretty closely, where the old z2 looked nothing like nuba. I had Wolf on my dark blue truck for a couple months and I really liked it, that was until I put the Pro on. I thought Pro was deeper and glossier that Wolf too, but didn't have the distortion of Wolf. Some people prefer distortion, but I'm not one of them. I liked both sealants, and they are 1,2 as far as my favorites go. Take another look at your hood, looks pretty glossy to me. Give it another shot on a dark car if you get a chance. Nice detail.
 
Burlyq:



Your opinion (disagreement) is highly appreciated. As a matter of fact, this review is very much influenced by your previous Z2 Pro review, which I highly relied upon as I test the new Z2.



And yes, it is indeed glossy as manifested by the pics, and I think it lacks sort of what you call "distortion" which I call depth or something that darkens the color of the paint. But anyway, it's just me. We may differ in preference.



UPDATE:



When compared to the old Z2, the new version no longer produces that plasticy sheen very much visible with the old one. The highly reflective characteristic of the new Z2 seems to produce a solid look, rather than palsticy look.



The elimination of the plasticy sheen seemed to suggest an added depth, but not much.



At any rate, the Z2 Pro will still find a daily user out of me. It may not provide the depth just like NXT, but the Z2 has a unique look of its own. (prolly 25% depth and 75% reflections, whereas NXT provides a 50/50 balance of depth and reflections, though it lacks

durability for me.)



The reflection it provide is a real killer though! I guess no product can provide both extremes. One product cannot produce extreme depth, without sacrificing reflections, and vice-versa. The Z2 polish has become very popular because of its extreme reflective qualities.



Anyway, the Z2 Pro will be my goto sealant for now!



Can't wait to try the Z8!!!
 
Nice review tripper_11,



My only fault with your review / protocol is the KSG base. This will influence the final appearance and I believe would make if difficult to see exactly what Z2-PRO impacts on a finsih appearance.



Excellent combo which I have tried in the past and my conclusion was that KSG contributes a great deal to the final appearance that the Z2-PRO can not correct or mask (darkening of hue and gloss).



I believe Sal is working on a prep product as we speak (paint cleanser) that will eliminate using products like AIO for a base and allow the Z polishes to directly bond to painted surface.



Again excellent review and thanks for taking the time to write it and post pixs. :bow

:wavey
 
tripper_11 said:
Burlyq:

And yes, it is indeed glossy as manifested by the pics, and I think it lacks sort of what you call "distortion" which I call depth or something that darkens the color of the paint.

Distortion is a very specific thing, when you look at a reflection in the paint, if it has ripples on the edge of the reflection, it has distortion. It is neither good or bad. We are used to using that word and thinking negatively, but with car wax it is just a trait of some waxes/sealants. If you look at the edge of the reflection of a Zaino'd car you will not see the ripples unless you have your beer goggles on, lol. Pro is rare because it is very glossy w/o distortion, most glossy products like Nubas have distortion. It's because Nuba is a true wax, and wax isn't a clear substance. It is close when processed for Auto use, but it is still not totally clear, but despite that many people chose Nuba shine above all others, and I too really like results Nuba's eventhough the have "distortion". Products with distortion have good qualities and products w/o distortion have good qualities, it's a matter of preference. I just wanted to clarify that.
 
blkZ28Conv said:
Nice review tripper_11,



My only fault with your review / protocol is the KSG base. This will influence the final appearance and I believe would make if difficult to see exactly what Z2-PRO impacts on a finsih appearance.



I believe Sal is working on a prep product as we speak (paint cleanser) that will eliminate using products like AIO for a base and allow the Z polishes to directly bond to painted surface.



Again excellent review and thanks for taking the time to write it and post pixs. :bow

:wavey



I guess you're correct in finding fault at using KSG as base. And maybe the AIO also.



I think it's high time that the Zaino system be complemented with an AIO like chemical cleaner that provides a unique look of its own, with balance depth and reflection or something that is unique only to the Zaino line.



Burlyq:



As always, I highly respect your opinion. Thanks for taking time to atleast go over the LONG review.:bow
 
JUST AN UPDATE:



Much As I was previously slightly disappointed with the Z2 Pro's lack of depth, I just want to make a clarification of my previous post.



After 3 days since the last Z2 Pro application (or maybe after the Z2 Pro has fully cured), that's the only time I noticed the true appearance of the product.



The Z2 Pro is very different from the old Z2. I must correct myself by saying it indeed provides nice depth (nice for a synthetic) just as Burlyq said in his review.



A blend of carnauba-wet, with DEPTH, without sacrificing reflections. Z2 Pro is totally awesome for me!



I apologized for being so impulsive on commenting that Z2 Pro indeed lack some depth, since I immediately jump into conclusion right after buffing off the product. But then again, as with any other synthetics (like NXT) I should have waited a period of time for it to fully cure, and that's the only time the product reveals itself! Still the king of synthetics!
 
tripper_11 ...thanks for coming back with your update, it's big of you to post a revision like that and it's very informative for anyone new to using polymer sealants.



I've also noticed that Zaino's appearance improves after a day or so (and a few other polymer sealants) .. so please NOT judge appearance on the first day, wait at least 24 hrs for the polymers to cure to see the sealant at it's full beauty.
 
Great up-date tripper-11.

Actually, an initial review, even if not always a final impression, is informative. In this case your review reminded us about a true sealant's ability to improve after complete curing and crossing-linking that may in some cases take over 24hrs. :xyxthumbs
 
Back
Top