Pennypacker
New member
I have yet to use either of these products, but after reading more about the two sealants from Finish Kare's site, what's the advantage of using FX-100 instead of 185? Besides the obvious difference of FX-100 being in sprayable form, it seems that 185 is at least as good or, in fact, trumps 100 in most areas, including cleaning ability, glossiness, and protection. This is just based off FK's own rating from their site. Who knows if this is how it pans out in the "real world," which is partly why I'm asking.
Is it mostly a result of FX-100's apparent greater ease of use because it's a spray? I know there's been much discussion already about FX-100 and how many people have been pleased with it. I just don't think I've read nearly as much about 185.
Just curious...
thanks
Is it mostly a result of FX-100's apparent greater ease of use because it's a spray? I know there's been much discussion already about FX-100 and how many people have been pleased with it. I just don't think I've read nearly as much about 185.
Just curious...
thanks