Vanilla Moose vs. AIO

Jcrawford

Jcrawford

New member
Currently i am using ans AIO, SG, S100 routine on my black nissan frontier. i feel as though something is missing, i know AIO and SG is very durable but it doesn't pop like i think it should. would there be any disadvantages to switching AIO to Vanilla Moose in my routine??
 
You might want to consider trying Vanilla Moose and S100 without the Klasse twins and see if you like the look. It won't be as durable though.
 
JCrawford- Switching to the VM would be the first part of a switch away from the K twins. The VM could be topped with either a sealant like P UPP or with a wax like your S100.



The "glaze (VM) with topper" look IS different from the "pure synthetic"/K twins look. You might like it better...it becomes a personal preference issue. But note that it won't protect quite like the Klasse.



I currently have VM + P21S on my metallic gray XJS- on THAT car, *I* like THAT look better than I'd like Klasse (which I use on other vehicles). It might be just the "pop" you're looking for.
 
Ive used vm with sg with great results, ive used ihg with klasse before and never had any problems whatsoever.
 
If your going with vanilla moose you might want to try topping with carnuba moose. I liked this combo much better than the klasse twins on my black.
 
Before you start jumping around looking for a product that will give you that "POP". Ask yourself this question: Did the "POP" exist prior to adding a protectant? If so, then the AIO,SG and S100 may not be your cup of tea. If not, a better prep is necessary to produce the "POP" that the protectant will protect, not produce on its own.

You might need something with more polishing power ( i.e. DACP, Menzerna IP & FP, etc) prior to AIO or even trying VM to enhance the "POP".

Hope this opens another avenue of thought about achieving that

"POP". :wavey
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top