Trashed: SurBuf, Wool, and time

Greg Nichols

New member
Okay gang! I've have become behind in my posting of work, been busy. Here is a boat I'm presently working on right now. The client wanted it in sellable shape, nothing like a mirror finish, a one hit polishing jobber. I had a little time on my hands with this so I did some testing.



I tested SurBuf pads, PC correction on a gel coat, and my patience. I also messed around with some different polishes. I still find 105 to be my friend for boats.



Here is the boat before: it wasn't chalky but headed in that direction, so I felt there is some hope of correction. When they get this bad, clients need to know that there is a good chance it will start fading faster than if they had just kept up on it. Boat gel coats are porous, and UV breaks them down fast. YEARLY maintenance is a MUST!




Jareds001.jpg




Jareds002.jpg




Jareds003.jpg






I did some test spots to see if the SurBuf or wool would be used. I decided to go with the SurBuf even though it was not as fast as the wool/rotary combo. I was using my KBM with both.



Jareds006.jpg




Jareds010.jpg




Jareds013.jpg




Pretty good clarity:

Jareds009.jpg




Jareds014.jpg




Same spot, but I wet sanded with 1500 and then re-polished, you can see the clarity even in this photo, but wow a huge diff in person.

Jareds018.jpg




Jareds020.jpg




Its coming along, and I'm getting a feel of this SurBuf and gel coat.

Jareds021.jpg




Jareds022.jpg






Okay, I decided to use a yellow 2.0 megs pad and 105 in an area to see how much correction I could get with that combo. I have used 105 the whole time too.

Jareds027.jpg




Now take a look at the SurBuf and 105. Both areas were not touched before hand, so this is diff. I have run across many threads saying they corrected the boat using only a PC and foam. the color dramatically improved, but the clarity is the difference. I also believe the gel coat is still oxidized and will fade in short order. Imagine what multi steps with sanding would do?!

Jareds026.jpg




The other side of the boat I switched back to my wool and rotary, why? Its faster, how much...took me about 1.5 hours less to do this other side to the same standard as the PC/SurBuf, this is minus the experimental processes. I think the PC/SurBuf on a boat is good, but not for heavy oxidation removals. The pads also take a huge beating, and need to be washed a lot. I can use one wool pad to three SurBufs.



Jareds029.jpg




Jareds031.jpg




Jareds032.jpg




Jareds033.jpg




While the clairty is greatly improved, its still has some marring (pad) left behind, but this is suppose to be a one hit polishing.

Jareds035.jpg




Just in case you forgot what the boat looked like:

Jareds008.jpg




Here is a summary:



I love SufBuf pads and they do a great job, but for serious corrective work on a boat......nothing beats wool and a rotary.



You can improve a boats appearance with a PC/foam but clarity is a stretch with oxidation.



I tired Meg 49 again, and it seemed to work great, but after a wash all the oils ran out showing areas I didn't work as well as others. With 105 I didn't have this problem. Yes I need to "feed" the gel coat, but why gum up a pad and get false results in the cutting stage? I will go over the whole boat with a PC/foam and feed oils back later, it will be faster then trying to do it all at once.



Boat are tough on your body, you need to charge accordingly, the time commitment is large. You use up wool pads, go through a lot of product, have tons of color transfer to pads.....charge properly don't sell your self short.



Cheers,

GREG
 
Nice work and write up, as always Greg.



I've had the same experience with megs 49 and other oily products. Looks good till the oils wash off.



I think it is a Maxum boat factory problem (see below). Or difference from factory to factory. Some gel-coats seem to be able to with stand the elements a lot better than others.



I can't remember my process for this boat, as it is a few years ago. But I do remember your same thoughts, that it will oxidize back fairly fast.





IMG_6660.JPG




IMG_6682.JPG




Greg will reply to PM soon, after some thought.







.
 
I've done a Maxum that same color, and it was just to far gone. I did wool + Extreme Cut, and it looked great, then I washed it with a light dilution of soap to remove any compound dust and wool hair, and BOOM, right back to faded.
 
advs1 said:
wow that difference is amazing!!



i havent done a boat that bad and i hope i never have to!! that looks like a lot of work.



it is a big diff, just wish I could of gotten more out of it with my process.



AndyVo said:
Nice turn around.



Starting using surbuf pads last week. I too love them. They are fantastic.



keep working with them as there is bit of a learning curve.



salty said:
Nice work and write up, as always Greg.



I've had the same experience with megs 49 and other oily products. Looks good till the oils wash off.



I think it is a Maxum boat factory problem (see below). Or difference from factory to factory. Some gel-coats seem to be able to with stand the elements a lot better than others.



I can't remember my process for this boat, as it is a few years ago. But I do remember your same thoughts, that it will oxidize back fairly fast.



Greg will reply to PM soon, after some thought.







.



Mark, you have been a huge help to me! Thanks again!




Brandon1 said:
I've done a Maxum that same color, and it was just to far gone. I did wool + Extreme Cut, and it looked great, then I washed it with a light dilution of soap to remove any compound dust and wool hair, and BOOM, right back to faded.



Brandon, Yes some boats gels are more "fragile" than others. The cheaper the boat the cheaper the gel is my observation.



RaskyR1 said:
Great work Greg! :2thumbs:



Thanks bud!



Tru_Shine said:
WOW!!! Awesome JOB!!!!!!



Thanks for the kudos!



gmblack3a said:
Great work Greg! Thanks for taking the time to share you experience on different processes.



Thanks for the sufBuf pad work you have done. Your contributions to this forum are noted by many.
 
Wow - This little test turned out to be a home run! Great work on this hughe mass of fadedness. You easliy bumped up the value 20%. I'm a fan of the rotary for gelcoat too, but liked you you went with Surbuf/PC. Nice!
 
Greg Nichols said:


Thanks for the sufBuf pad work you have done. Your contributions to this forum are noted by many.



Thank you sir! I'm honored to help where I can.



IMO if it was not for Kevin Brown, I feel as though I'd be detailing in the "stone age." :xyxthumbs



Can't forget to mention my good friend Todd Helme who actually talked me thru the KBM on the phone. :bow
 
A bit off topic, but I'm sure Mr. Nichols won't mind if I hijack his thread a bit. ;)



Thanks to Greg's relay of Brian's technique on how to use a SurBuf pad, I used one for the first time yesterday on a trashed Elantra. I was able to achieve 95% defect correction in one application. Truly a sweet pad.
 
^^^



Yeah SuperBee you can partially highjack my thread, the pad is a great pad. Does have a learning curve to it, and it isn't a pad you can use over and over.....I have found it has a useful life of like one boat. If the foam backing was a bit more dense that would help too.



Cheers,

GREG
 
I'm going to check out Surbuf products. There are great results for using a PC.



I've detailed many boats with the PC before using dense foam compounding pads. I use Malco Tru-Grit compound to remove heavy oxidation. That method works, yet it takes too long.



Nothing beats rotary and wool for marine gel coats. I will still look into Surbuf because I still like using my PC for topsides to Surbuf pads may just do the trick.
 
Back
Top